Re: curing homosexual sheep

[Guest guest]

> SCIENTISTS are conducting experiments to change the sexuality of gay

> sheep ...

Oh, those experiments are popular throughout the mideast.

[Guest guest]

Jane wrote:

> The Sunday Times

> December 31, 2006

> Science told: hands off gay sheep

> Isabel Oakeshott and Gourlay

> Experiments that claim to cure homosexual rams spark anger

Ugh! I thought we were past the idea of curing homosexuality.

(Not that American society has come that far in accepting it,

but we're heading in that direction.) They should drop this.

Clay

[Guest guest]

It was 3 Jan 2007, when Jane Meyerding commented:

> The Sunday Times

> December 31, 2006

>

> Science told: hands off gay sheep

> Isabel Oakeshott and Gourlay

> Experiments that claim to cure homosexual rams spark anger

>

<snip>

> the academic community. Potentially, the techniques could one day be

> adapted for human use, with doctors perhaps being able to offer parents

> pre-natal tests to determine the likely sexuality of offspring or a

> hormonal treatment to change the orientation of a child. Roselli has said

> he would be uncomfortable about parents choosing sexuality, but argues that

> it is up to policy makers to legislate on questions of ethics.

Yeah, it's always worked out so well to legislate morality. <sigh>

[Guest guest]

> t was 3 Jan 2007, when Jane Meyerding commented:

>

> > The Sunday Times

> > December 31, 2006

> >

> > Science told: hands off gay sheep

> > Isabel Oakeshott and Gourlay

> > Experiments that claim to cure homosexual rams spark anger

> >

> <snip>

>

> > the academic community. Potentially, the techniques could one day be

> > adapted for human use, with doctors perhaps being able to offer

> parents

> > pre-natal tests to determine the likely sexuality of offspring or a

> > hormonal treatment to change the orientation of a child. Roselli

> has said

> > he would be uncomfortable about parents choosing sexuality, but

> argues that

> > it is up to policy makers to legislate on questions of ethics.

>

>

> Yeah, it's always worked out so well to legislate morality. <sigh>

Ain't that the truth!

And then what/who's next? I'm an athiest, but like a person who says

not to mess with " God's work " , I don't believe in messin' with genetics

to work to our " advantage " , not for vegetables (modified foods), not

for animals and most definitely not for humans.

Why? Because I don't trust humans in the least, it will ALWAYS be

taken a step farther to infinity, especially those NT's in charge.

a