Guest guest Posted September 10, 2006 Report Share Posted September 10, 2006 I spent more time reading the animal rights site. I find it very useful for me because it gives step by step directions for how to do things, and I could use some help with sequential thinking. Today when I went to take my " power nap, " which is what I have to do after spending time with people, I immediately had thoughts going through my head about other things to do. Here are the two that popped into my head. 1. There is a church musician's blog site. I can get in touch with the person who runs the site and ask him if I can do a blog on being an autistic church musician. I think that I would mostly blog about what it is like for me as an autistic and face blind person to be in a position as a music leader. I have ideas for several entries, and since every time I go to work there, something new comes up that is autism-related, I think I can keep it going for quite a while! I think I'd also post some links to sites on autism as I don't want my entire blog taken up by explaining what has already been done well on other sites. I would want to include a site that gives a basic definition, such as the Wikipedia site, and perhaps the national Autism Society (U.S.) I forget the exact name of that group, but it's not CAN or Autism Speaks. And then maybe a link to the AQ test. And more than one link to sites like autistics.org and/or many others. Suggestions requested. I will be working on this during the week, when I get a break from my kid and trying to get better at choir rehearsals! I think I have to send a proposal and a few sample entries to the blog site owner and obtain approval. The advantages of this is it reaches people who probably weren't thinking about autism anyway. In addition, if I keep the focus on things that I do to get through a day at church, or my practice sessions, people can see that, yes, I do things differently, I get frustrated about certain things, (and other things I probably take more calmly than an NT would!), and that there is a spectrum of neurodiversity and it's not necessarily all bad. They might even get some cool tips on how to do things at their own church. 2. Back to the TGIF idea, what would it look to like " raise consciousness " with TGIF personnel without doing a protest? Would a large group go in to eat a meal, actually eat and pay for the meal and leave the tip, but somehow make time for the manager (a busy person) to come to the table and tell the mgr. that " TGIF donates (?) or sponsors Autism Speaks, yet we are autistics who DO speak, and please take the time to look at our pamphlet (some of the good pamphlet suggestions in the previous posts here could be used). We are not opposed to TGIF but we ARE opposed to some of the policies of Autism Speaks, especially as they don't seem to permit actual autistics to question some of their policies... " I am NOT wording this very succintly, but the general idea is to educate the management of just that one store (and then others), who then might talk to or see other managers at meetings, and someone might say " Hey, what about these other autistic people who can talk and don't think they are being given a say in their own destiny? What about the eugenics part of the policy? " or something like that. Not as flashy as a protest, and slower than writing to your congressperson. ONE CAVEAT about CONGRESS, or any other person in a position of power/authority. I might have said this before. Research your representative/senator to see what they have sponsored or spoken about in the past. I found that my representative in Virginia would be COMPLETELY irked by using Holocaust terminology as he has entered several resolutions condemning the use of Holocaust terminology being used for anything but the WWII Holocaust. I just found that out by accident when I was looking at his web site. Here again: that animal rights site with all the constructive info. http://www.awbi.org/pamp10.htm (animal rights) Rhonda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2006 Report Share Posted September 10, 2006 a couple of notes: 1. Did it occur to anybody that TGI Friday's is about the most NT-oriented restaurant (for lack of a better description) you'll find outside of a Planet Hollywood sign? Okay, maybe Hooters, but I was never in one. We went to a TGI on secretary's day because someone requested it. Anyhow, the point is that unless a bunch of us plan to fly out to a Planet TGI's for the purpose of the protest, we will probably never set foot in the place. We just wouldn't bother. 2. As a practical matter, if someone wants to say or do something, one could politely tell the manager of the local franchise that the campaign is offensive to autisitics because of the group's agenda and the implications of the name of the organization. 3. The " promotion-of-abortion without benefit to 'choice' " issue, which I guess I should address in a separate post. - s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2006 Report Share Posted September 10, 2006 I get Stan's point. Yes, indeed: >if someone wants to say or do > something, one could politely tell the manager of the local > franchise that the campaign is offensive to autisitics because > of the group's agenda and the implications of the name of the > organization. If more than one TGIF restaurant works hand-in-glove with " Autism Speaks, " we could also politely tell the manager of the chain. Tomorrow (Monday) when businesses open, I'll call the toll-free number of the TGIF headquarters (800-FRIDAYS = 800/374-3297) to check this out: I'll just say (politely) that " I've heard TGIF works with and/or raises funds for a group called 'Autism Speaks,' and I would like to know more about this " — and then tell you what the TGIF people say, after which we can plan what to say to TGIF. Possibilities include " raising consciousness " (as Stan suggests) by phone (as well as in person and/or writing letters). Re: >Would a large group go in to eat a meal, actually eat and pay for >the meal and leave the tip, and make it a *good* tip (because of what Stan pointed out re what waitresses think of people who leave stingy, or no, tips) .. >but somehow make time for the manager (a busy person) >to come to the table If the group eats, tips well, and *then* asks for the manager (and refuses to leave the table till s/he arrives), this could look unusual enough that even the busiest manager would feel a need to check it out. Then do as Stan suggests: and do the same by phone, of course, if we later (or instead) call TGIF and/or its local franchises: >and tell the mgr. .... or the phone-person ... >that " TGIF donates (?) or >sponsors Autism Speaks, yet we are autistics who DO speak, and please take the time to look at our pamphlet ... Make this: " We understand that TGIF donates/sponsors a group called 'Autism Speaks' which claims to speak for autistic people because it claims that we autistic people cannot speak for ourselves or think for ourselves. We are autistic, we DO speak and think for ourselves, so we hope you will re-consider your association with 'Autism Speaks' which claims that we can't. Please take the time to look at our pamphlet ... " [and then the rest exactly as Stan has it] This takes longer to say, but I think it makes things clearer to NTs. For phone-contact (individuals calling 800-FRIDAYS), we'd have to modify this somewhat: " I understand that TGIF donates/sponsors a group called 'Autism Speaks' which claims to speak for autistic people because it claims that we autistic people cannot speak for ourselves or think for ourselves. I am autistic, we DO speak and think for ourselves, so I hope you will re-consider your association with 'Autism Speaks' which claims that we can't. For one thing, 'Autism Speaks' has a history of not allowing actual autistic people to question any of their policies. .... " NOTE: if we do phone-calling, we should each use somewhat different phrases and examples, instead of identically following the same script (or it would look as if we didn't really think for ourselves after all). E.g., one caller could say the above things, another caller could focus on the eugenics/pressure-to-abort stuff, still another caller could mention 'Autism Speaks' " degrading TV-portrayals of autistic people as sickly " basket case " types, yet another person could talk about 'Autism Speaks' " encouragement of torture programs, someone else could talk about the fact that the organization apparently considers it " excusable " (has said so on daytime television) when moms and dads murder their autistic kids, etc. What do you think? Kate Gladstone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 Remeber theur bartender olympics is supporting autism speaks here in NY > > Well, I called up TGIF this morning (800-FRIDAYS = 800/374-3297) and > said (not giving my name) — > > " I heard that TGIF supports an organization called 'Autism Speaks' > through events and fund-raising conducted at different TGIF > franchises. I'd like to know more about this, because I believe in > supporting businesses that support worthwhile non-profit > organizations. " > (I did not lie here, folks — I just didn't actually *tell* them > whether or not I consider " Autism Speaks " a *worthwhile* non-profit > organization! I figured that, if it sounded as if I'd send them some > business if they answered " yes, " this might make sure that they > answered my question.) > > The phone-lady said that, as far as she knew, the TGIF chain does not > support this organization: she said that she probably would remember > if they did. She continued: " If any TGIF locations are doing support > or fund-raising for this group you mentioned, that would be an > activity of the local branch that does the activity, and they could > tell you about it - so you would want to call them. Still, " she > continued, " just in case I don't remember and we really do have some > support going on for this organization, is it okay if I transfer you > to the Publicity Department? " I said " Sure, " so she transferred me — I > got a recorded message, with time to answer, so I left my name and > phone-number and the same question that I had asked the > phone-receptionist. > If the publicity office calls me back, I'll let you know. > > > Kate Gladstone > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.