Guest guest Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Just my 2 cents' worth. Good point, but I think the solution is somewhere in the middle. I am usually suspect of studies that advocate pharmaceutical intervention, when many have been helped by behavioral intervention, they just refuse to avail themselves of it. I take these studies with a grain of salt because I truly think the pharmaceutical companies are really trying to push more drugs on people, and as profit-driven entities, I don't entirely trust their motives, nor do I believe pills necessarily solve all the problems. They can, in fact, make it worse. When there are billions of dollars involved, people are wont to skew the studies to support pharmaceutical intervention. And people have done amazing things despite damage or alterations to those areas of the brain. I just can't entirely excuse it like an illness like cancer or muscular dystrophy -- I still see a " choice " component there. Along the same lines, it irks me when I see alcoholism referred to as a " disease " -- I'd rather it be classified as slightly different. Again, because of the " choice " component. Again, just my 2 cents' worth. -Kyla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.