Re: NT=AS does not compute.

[Guest guest]

> But, back herds/packs/family groups. Humankind (homo sapiens) were

> never " packs " or " herds " . If we seem to behave like either, it's only

> because we share some basic commonalities with the rest of the animal

> kingdom (coincidence comes into play as well), and as I mentioned,

> there are very fine lines between herds, packs and family groups, but

> especially between packs and family groups....

That makes a lot of sense. Would explain why neither herd nor pack

really fits comfortably.

Genyin

--

" I know the answer! The answer lies within the heart of all mankind!

The answer is twelve? I think I'm in the wrong building. "

M. Schultz

[Guest guest]

Who ever said there has to be concrete evidence that something exists?

don't you guys have faith? Just because you cannot see something with your

eyes, doesn't mean its not there

On Feb 8, 2008 10:09 AM, Kelsang Genyin

wrote:

> On 07/02/2008, P. C. MacNeil <msp@...<msp%40ns.sympatico.ca>>

> wrote:

>

> > But, back herds/packs/family groups. Humankind (homo sapiens) were

> > never " packs " or " herds " . If we seem to behave like either, it's only

> > because we share some basic commonalities with the rest of the animal

> > kingdom (coincidence comes into play as well), and as I mentioned,

> > there are very fine lines between herds, packs and family groups, but

> > especially between packs and family groups....

>

> That makes a lot of sense. Would explain why neither herd nor pack

> really fits comfortably.

>

> Genyin

>

> --

> " I know the answer! The answer lies within the heart of all mankind!

> The answer is twelve? I think I'm in the wrong building. "

> M. Schultz

>

>

--

http://www.tcoburn.net

[Guest guest]

> Who ever said there has to be concrete evidence that something

> exists? don't you guys have faith? Just because you cannot see

> something with your eyes, doesn't mean its not there

Different people have different standards for what they are and are

not willing to accept, of course. I am of the school of thought that

says that you should not believe that something exists unless there

is proof that it does. It's quite true that I don't know for sure

that there is no invisible unicorn in my closet, but since no one has

any proof or any other kind of reason to believe that there is one, I

don't embrace the notion.

[Guest guest]

> Who ever said there has to be concrete evidence that something exists?

> don't you guys have faith? Just because you cannot see something with your

> eyes, doesn't mean its not there

I don't understand what you are referring to? What does faith have to

do with herds and packs and family groups?

Of course I have faith - I'm a nun. But I'm careful *what* I have faith in.

Genyin

--

" I know the answer! The answer lies within the heart of all mankind!

The answer is twelve? I think I'm in the wrong building. "

M. Schultz

[Guest guest]

>

> > Who ever said there has to be concrete evidence that something

> exists?

> > don't you guys have faith? Just because you cannot see something

> with your

> > eyes, doesn't mean its not there

>

> I don't understand what you are referring to? What does faith have to

> do with herds and packs and family groups?

>

> Of course I have faith - I'm a nun. But I'm careful *what* I have

> faith in.

>

> Genyin

I second that question as it's left me quite confused!

a