Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 I felt I had to jump in on this discussion. I agree with Connie about the fact that it would be easier to take if the decision was one that you made on your own. After reading 's post, it sounds like we worked at the same kind of place, maybe the same company. I work/worked for a company that has offices all over the world. Last summer my manager asked me if I wanted to take sick time. He told me that with the time that I had put in that I was eligible for up to 52 weeks off with FULL salary. I said I didn't want to stop working and fought it for almost a year. After missing some key sales meetings and cancelling business trips, they started to ask me again. I went to talk to someone in Human Resources (HR) and he was real honest with me. He told me that although the company would never let me go because of my illness, I could always be part of a " resource action " due to performance issues. He also brought something up that I hadn't thought of before. Most programs at big companies, such as promotions, pay raises and even training, are put in place for " retention " purposes. If you were a manager who had to deside between one employee who had many years left with the company and one who may not be around much longer, who do you think will get the raise/promotion? Afterall, they have a business to run. So like , at first I was mad and wondered why they would do this to me after 20 years of service! In retrospect though I think it is for the best. With the morning sickness that I have posted about and other problems I have been doing pretty bad. Last week when I was real sick my wife asked if I would like to be on a business trip and feel like I did. No way!! So like , I feel better thinking that they just were looking out for me and my best interest. There aren't many employers who let you take " early retirement " with a nice salary and medical benefits for life except maybe the government. -- Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 Hi Bob, You know it's true that many companies " say " that they do not discriminate because of an illness, but just as your HR Representative told you, they can always find ways around the law like his example of " resource action " . However, as a HR person, I'm very surprised that he would let his little secret out. That is like admitting that they go ahead and discriminate but call it something else and his statement in itself screams of discrimination. You're old HR person needs to learn " to zip his lips! " Because if he told the wrong person that information, his company would most likely be up for a discrimination law suit, even though, he thought that he was doing you a favor by letting you in on business practices. It is most definitely all about the bottom line and not about their HUMAN RESOURCES (people) in the business community. It was nice to hear from you and it sounds like you're happy and have adjusted well to your situation though. I think that we would be very surprised at how many times this same situation has probably happened within the business community! Connie, USA Disclosure? Employment issues I felt I had to jump in on this discussion. I agree with Connie about the fact that it would be easier to take if the decision was one that you made on your own. After reading 's post, it sounds like we worked at the same kind of place, maybe the same company. I work/worked for a company that has offices all over the world. Last summer my manager asked me if I wanted to take sick time. He told me that with the time that I had put in that I was eligible for up to 52 weeks off with FULL salary. I said I didn't want to stop working and fought it for almost a year. After missing some key sales meetings and cancelling business trips, they started to ask me again. I went to talk to someone in Human Resources (HR) and he was real honest with me. He told me that although the company would never let me go because of my illness, I could always be part of a " resource action " due to performance issues. He also brought something up that I hadn't thought of before. Most programs at big companies, such as promotions, pay raises and even training, are put in place for " retention " purposes. If you were a manager who had to deside between one employee who had many years left with the company and one who may not be around much longer, who do you think will get the raise/promotion? Afterall, they have a business to run. So like , at first I was mad and wondered why they would do this to me after 20 years of service! In retrospect though I think it is for the best. With the morning sickness that I have posted about and other problems I have been doing pretty bad. Last week when I was real sick my wife asked if I would like to be on a business trip and feel like I did. No way!! So like , I feel better thinking that they just were looking out for me and my best interest. There aren't many employers who let you take " early retirement " with a nice salary and medical benefits for life except maybe the government. -- Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 I think our main problem as IgAners is that we are not easy to fix - you can't just put in a wheelchair ramp or low desk to allow us to be productive. In Australia, employers have a duty of care to ensure we are not injured or killed in the performance of our duties, so they have to make allowances for disability such as arranging assistance for heavy lifting. This could extend to not sending staff away on business, and would be subject to HR/Management coordination. Reply-To: iga-nephropathy To: <iga-nephropathy > Subject: RE: Disclosure? Employment issues Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:30:02 -0400 Hi Bob, You know it's true that many companies " say " that they do not discriminate because of an illness, but just as your HR Representative told you, they can always find ways around the law like his example of " resource action " . However, as a HR person, I'm very surprised that he would let his little secret out. That is like admitting that they go ahead and discriminate but call it something else and his statement in itself screams of discrimination. You're old HR person needs to learn " to zip his lips! " Because if he told the wrong person that information, his company would most likely be up for a discrimination law suit, even though, he thought that he was doing you a favor by letting you in on business practices. It is most definitely all about the bottom line and not about their HUMAN RESOURCES (people) in the business community. It was nice to hear from you and it sounds like you're happy and have adjusted well to your situation though. I think that we would be very surprised at how many times this same situation has probably happened within the business community! Connie, USA Disclosure? Employment issues I felt I had to jump in on this discussion. I agree with Connie about the fact that it would be easier to take if the decision was one that you made on your own. After reading 's post, it sounds like we worked at the same kind of place, maybe the same company. I work/worked for a company that has offices all over the world. Last summer my manager asked me if I wanted to take sick time. He told me that with the time that I had put in that I was eligible for up to 52 weeks off with FULL salary. I said I didn't want to stop working and fought it for almost a year. After missing some key sales meetings and cancelling business trips, they started to ask me again. I went to talk to someone in Human Resources (HR) and he was real honest with me. He told me that although the company would never let me go because of my illness, I could always be part of a " resource action " due to performance issues. He also brought something up that I hadn't thought of before. Most programs at big companies, such as promotions, pay raises and even training, are put in place for " retention " purposes. If you were a manager who had to deside between one employee who had many years left with the company and one who may not be around much longer, who do you think will get the raise/promotion? Afterall, they have a business to run. So like , at first I was mad and wondered why they would do this to me after 20 years of service! In retrospect though I think it is for the best. With the morning sickness that I have posted about and other problems I have been doing pretty bad. Last week when I was real sick my wife asked if I would like to be on a business trip and feel like I did. No way!! So like , I feel better thinking that they just were looking out for me and my best interest. There aren't many employers who let you take " early retirement " with a nice salary and medical benefits for life except maybe the government. -- Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.