Guest guest Posted August 12, 2001 Report Share Posted August 12, 2001 Started on Propafenone (Rhythmol / Arhythmol) on Friday 1:00 p.m. after 2 weeks in AF. After 3 pills (by Sat 10:00 am) I converted but after a further few hours I was throwing ectopics, which got worse with time. I got / am getting the 1-2-3-THUMP I got with Flecainide (1-2-3 = more or less normal NSR beats). After 5 x 150 mg pills (2 Friday, 3 Saturday) (start dose = 3 x 150/day) this last night has been really bad - the THUMPs are really heavy and I woke up at 2 am and have not got back to sleep. I've also got other bad side effects - really dry mouth & nasty taste, and have to stay near a toilet (already!). I think this drug is disagreeing with me! Anyhow : to the question: The thumps feel different to the mild thumps I get when in AF (or when on disopyramide). I shall be calling the Doc shortly, but I am wondering if these are PVC's. Ronnie's message (4012) says she can tell between PAC's and PVC's - someone asked how, but answer there came none, at the time. Can anyone answer now? - - - The drug info says Propafenone (and Flecainide) can increase / create PVCs. I never got these big thumps on Disopyramide. My ventricular response has always been slow (i.e. non-fast) (being vagal, I now learn from Johan Waktarie / Prof Camm's book) so I wonder if Flecainide and Propafenone are that good for me, as they only prolong the refractory period a small amount but slow AV conduction significantly, whereas Disopyramide prolongs atrial refractoriness more but doesn't slow conduction. My theory is the THUMPS are late A-V conductions from the atria when they reach the ventricles. It appears the Propafenone might work but at a low dose - this is also what happened to me on Flecainide - v low dose sometimes worked, but higher doses were pro-arrhythmic. Oh grrrr! I think I shall be calling the Doc and asking to come off this. I felt better in AF !! Best of health to me and to all, Vicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2001 Report Share Posted August 12, 2001 Vicky, I wish I could answer your question as to the difference between PAC's and PVC's. I'm hoping someone who has had this experience will jump in with some helpful information. Sorry to hear you are struggling so with the new drug. The THUMPS must be extremely disconcerting. You are very much in my thoughts, and hope to hear soon that you have seen your dr and perhaps come off the Proafenone. Keep us posted! Best to you, as always, Sandy The thumps feel different to the mild thumps I get when in AF (or when on disopyramide). I shall be calling the Doc shortly, but I am wondering if these are PVC's. Ronnie's message (4012) says she can tell between PAC's and PVC's - someone asked how, but answer there came none, at the time. Can anyone answer now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2001 Report Share Posted August 12, 2001 I am a new afib sufferer but I have had PACs and PVCs my whole life (age 49 now). I can tell the difference because there is a longer pause and a stronger " next beat " after a PVC. I don't normally notice a strong " next beat " when it is a PAC. I have been watching my own ECG when both have occurred so I knew which I was feeling. I hope that helps you. I had only had 3 episodes of 1-2 day afib in 8 months until this last one that lasted 12 days. I was placed on Norpace on day 10 and by day 12 was in NSR. Except for a kind of dry mouth and a little worse than normal vision I feel fine and am relieved to be back in NSR....... Jack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2001 Report Share Posted August 12, 2001 In a message dated 8/11/2001 11:26:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, vmpaf@... writes: << After 3 pills (by Sat 10:00 am) I converted but after a further few hours I was throwing ectopics, which got worse with time. I got / am getting the 1-2-3-THUMP I got with Flecainide (1-2-3 = more or less normal NSR beats). >> Vicki, I am so sorry to hear that you are having so much trouble. Since I am only six days away from my last ten day afib session, I can really sympathize. I just took a break here because, although it may be hard to believe, as I typed the word " sympathize, " I felt the familiar tachycardia which precedes afib for me. Now I am in afib! I guess in the future I had better type sympathy notes only when I am already in afib since I seem to overdo the sympathy. Oh well, I hope this session won't be as long as the last. I don't know much about PVC's and PAC's, but I have had both recorded on EKG's before afib was ever picked up by an EKG. As I recall the PVC's felt like an extra beat (too soon), and the PAC's felt like a delayed beat (too late). However, I'm not sure about this since it was about eighteen years ago. I do know that when I am in afib, I often experience the pattern you described of three or more normal beats followed by a seemingly ectopic beat. This is the pattern my afib often follow just before I convert to sinus. On one occasion when I was experiencing normal beats followed by an ectopic beat, both my doctor and I thought was in sinus. An EKG, however, showed that I was still in afib. I wonder if you might be experiencing afib similarly and thinking as I did that you are in sinus? At any rate, it sounds as if you would be wise to stop that medication if it makes you feel worse than when you are in your normal afib. Good luck, and let us know how you're doing! in afib in Seattle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2001 Report Share Posted August 12, 2001 Vicky, I asked my doc if I could tell pacs from pvcs by the strength of the thump, and she said no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2001 Report Share Posted August 15, 2001 Thanks to all for your concern and advice. I've now been in either AF or 123-thump for 18 days. This run is just about to take over as the longest ever attack (20 days before, ISTR). The Propafenone has definitely reacted badly with me. I stopped it after 1.7 days = 5 x 150 mg pills total and it took a further 2 days to " convert " back to AF from 123-thump. I then took just *one* 150 mg pill (the " minimum " dose is 3 x 150 / day) on Tuesday morning and it put me straight back to all the same symptoms! I think this low dose and long time to clear may be because I could be in the " slow metaboliser " group mentioned in the Rxmed monograph on Propafenone - just my theory. I have an ECG and Doc's appt scheduled on Friday (which was the 1-week follow-up originally for checking for any widening of the QRS complex) so I shall take just one more pill on Thursday afternoon to make sure I'm in 123-thump mode on Friday (!) and see if this is indeed PVC's as I think it is. I have been familiarising myself with the traces on Mark Hammerschmidt's excellent ECG FAQ page (see the links page), and I think what I have is the PVC/quadrigeminy trace. We shall see. Anyway, I feel there's *no way* this huge thump is atrial - it *has* to be ventricular! If I am proven right, I shall then be less impressed with those Docs who say their patients can't tell which is which. Anyhow, " where next? " is then the question. As Flecainide sort of half-worked before, when my digestion was still up the creek badly, and now is easing somewhat having kept off wheat, I might re-try it. I'll keep you all posted. Best of health to all, Vicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2001 Report Share Posted August 15, 2001 HI Vicky Where can I find the url for this page? > Hammerschmidt's excellent ECG FAQ page (see the links page), and I think > what I have is the PVC/quadrigeminy trace. We shall see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2001 Report Share Posted August 15, 2001 > Where can I find the url for this page? > > Hammerschmidt's excellent ECG FAQ page (see the links page), and I think > > what I have is the PVC/quadrigeminy trace. We shall see. > it's in the 'basic information' of the bookmark sect (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport/links) the link is http://www.mikecowley.co.uk/markhammerschmidt/ArrhythmiaReview.htm -- D 32, Leeds, UK - 26 hours into AF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2001 Report Share Posted August 15, 2001 In a message dated 8/15/01 11:20:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time, vmpaf@... writes: << Anyhow, " where next? " is then the question. As Flecainide sort of half-worked before, when my digestion was still up the creek badly, and now is easing somewhat having kept off wheat, I might re-try it. I'll keep you all posted. >> Vicki, Do keep us posted on your condition. I've wondered how you were doing. The Flecainide might be worth another try if you don't have any heart problem other than afib. My cardiologist said, as I mentioned before, that drug would be his choice for me as a next treatment if my current drugs fail to control the afib. He said also said that Flecainide is statistically more effective in women than some other drugs like Sotalol. You and (26 hours) both have my sympathy as I enter my 80th hour of afib. As usual I am feeling no symptoms, but my pulse tells me that the elusive sinus has escaped me yet again. Good luck, and let us know what you decide. in afib in Seattle :-( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2001 Report Share Posted August 16, 2001 Thanks, . I am indeed thinking of going back to Flecainide, the thinking being that it half-worked before, and now I know it is pro-arrhythmic at higher doses, I shan't try that again. In fact my first days on Flec I got this same 1-2-3-thump (unsurprising in retrospect as Flec and Propaf are the same class). I brought up the thump with my Cardio at the time and he seemed unconcerned (or maybe didn't know what it was?), but I am far more concerned now I think it is PVCs. In fact I'm quite cross, in that I spent years, literally, messing about with Flecainide but only now (after this Propaf experience) do I begin to understand. My " heart " originally *told* me the instant I had taken the *first* Flecainide pill that it was pro-arrhythmic. I will always remember a trip to A & E/ER that first evening where they just told me to up the dose !!! What are these guys FOR if not to know this stuff and pass it on ?!?!?*£$%* & !!! Anyway, I steel myself for one more Propaf pill this afternoon to get me back to 123-thump for tomorrow's ECG, then that's IT !! I actually *feel* a whole lot better today, even though back in " proper " AF, but with that damned thing just about out of my system. Best of health to all, Vicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2001 Report Share Posted August 16, 2001 > Thanks, . > > I am indeed thinking of going back to Flecainide, the thinking being > that it half-worked before, and now I know it is pro-arrhythmic at > higher doses, I shan't try that again. In fact my first days on Flec I > got this same 1-2-3-thump (unsurprising in retrospect as Flec and Propaf > are the same class). I brought up the thump with my Cardio at the time > and he seemed unconcerned (or maybe didn't know what it was?), but I am > far more concerned now I think it is PVCs. > > In fact I'm quite cross, in that I spent years, literally, messing about > with Flecainide but only now (after this Propaf experience) do I begin > to understand. My " heart " originally *told* me the instant I had taken > the *first* Flecainide pill that it was pro-arrhythmic. I will always > remember a trip to A & E/ER that first evening where they just told me to > up the dose !!! > > What are these guys FOR if not to know this stuff and pass it on > ?!?!?*£$%* & !!! > > Anyway, I steel myself for one more Propaf pill this afternoon to get me > back to 123-thump for tomorrow's ECG, then that's IT !! I actually > *feel* a whole lot better today, even though back in " proper " AF, but > with that damned thing just about out of my system. > > Best of health to all, > Vicky Vicky: Your bad experience with Propafenone just underlines how quirky this AF thing is. For me it has thus far been a godsend. I say this as I celebrate the 80th AF-free day, the last AF-free stretch being 42 days, followed by a short 4-hour session of AF, and the one before that about three weeks. About 12 hours total of AF since I started Propafenone on March 10th. This after episodes of 12 - 60 hours every two or three days, would seem to be improvement. Yet I'm not surprised; one person's blessing - another's poison! I can understand how frustrating it must be. I keep praying for this respite, (for that's how I see it) to go on for a year or more. Because when this med runs its course I'll be back to Square One. I feel a little less energetic because of the Metoprolol I'm also on, both it and the Rhythmol (prop) in small doses - 25 mg./da. of Metop. and 2 x 150 prop.. Hang in there - there's something around the corner for you too. Lawrence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.