Guest guest Posted May 8, 2007 Report Share Posted May 8, 2007 From: LK Woodruff Via: CO-CURE Dr. Wm Reeves needs to be removed immediately from his position! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5/5/2007 Director Gerberding: The following (below) was posted today on CO-CURE, and is extremely upsetting. It is also yet another example of why Dr. Wm Reeves needs to be removed immediately from his position, and no longer be involved with efforts regarding 'CFS' (Fukada, et al)! I do believe the man has completely lost touch with reality. I know he has spent the past 30 years both obfuscating illness information, and as the post below shows yet again, consorting with the 'Wessely School' of proponents, a group of primarily UK psychologists and psychiatrists whose sole purpose for years now has been to inundate the world with reams and reams of data about their MADE-UP psychosocial illness MODEL, which they refer to as 'CFS/ME'. It is well-known that they are paid handsomely to do so by companies like UNUM, etc. Please further understand this: --> The WHO does not recognize or code any illness called 'CFS/ME' . `````` Furthermore, People who meet the Fukada, et al, criteria for 'CFS' may well benefit from CBT and GET, as they are 'fatigued' for some reason. Many illnesses present with fatigue. And once that reason--or illness--resolves, so too will the fatigue...which means the majority will likely 'recover'. `````` --> But this is NOT the case for people with ME! These patients were hit by a 'sudden onset viral event', followed by a 'cascade of events throughout their bodies' which left them with all of the many very specific symptoms of ME (which is classified very differently by the WHO under G93.3, Neurogenic). These patients will only become worse when trying to exert, due to the very different physiology of their illness, and the extensive damage to their bodies. ```````` It is beyond absurd that so many continue--with all that is known today from the scientific research done worldwide and to-date--to act as if these 3 things are the same, when they very clearly are NOT. ```````` May is ME Awareness Month And I continue to ask: * Why does the the USA have no planned ME Awareness activities? * Why does it not recognise ME? (G93.3, ICD10) Well, one reason may be because the USA still has not adopted the 15+ year old ICD10 Codes! I know my medical diagnosis continually reverts back to CFS, for that reason! * Why does it do NO ME research? * Why does it ignore those of us so horribly ill with such a debilitating neurogenic illness? * Why does the gov'n persist in focusing what little effort and money they do, on 'CFS' instead??? `````` No one ever died from 'CFS', but the far more debilitating ME does kill. An entirely new approach and focus is way past due. Please lead the way, Director Gerberding. The patients with true ME--which is NOT a subset of CFS!!--are far too ill and struggling mightily to just make it through each day. They cannot possibly take on an active leadership role. Tho many of us wish we could.... Please work closely & collaboratively with prominent, valid, committed researchers around the world to finally understand the etiology of ME, and help improve the lives of those who suffer so horribly from it. End this tragedy.... Know that just because Reeves, et al, have chosen to NOT DO biomedical research does NOT mean none exists!!! I have written to you previously. I have tried to send relevant and timely scientific illness information. I have provided names of the top researchers from around the world. I have offered to help in whatever ways I am able to. I am horrifically ill. And I am sick to death of reading about Reeves' continued and misguided nonsense!!!! Get someone serious into that position. Someone who does more than phone prevalence studies on 'fatigue' and 'behavioural assessments'. Someone who doesn't hang out with the 'Wessely School', or go play military on the weekends. Hire a scientist with excellent credentials and the drive to conquer a devastating illness. And then see how quickly things start happening. Most sincerely, LaVonne K Woodruff lkw777@... 651/295-0935 2884 138th St W Rosemount MN 55068-3465 ##################### Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 00:33:23 +0100 Subject: NOT: CFS at the 28th Society of Behavioural Medicine Annual Meeting & Scientific March 21-24, 2007 (Please check pdf 155 pages if interested. These are just relevant snippets): http://www.sbm.org/meeting/2007/finalprogram.pdf WHITE, CHALDER & REEVES From Efficacy to Effectiveness - Assessment and Treatment of CFS -->28th Society of Behavioural Medicine Annual Meeting & Scientific Sessions March 21-24, 2007 FINAL PROGRAM 28th Annual Meeting & Scietific Sessions Science to Impact -->The Breadth of Behavioural Medicine Final Programme -->'Better Health through Behaviour Change' March 21st-24th 2007 Marriot Wardman Park Washington DC Symposium #3 9:00 am - 10:30 am Admission by name badge. land Suite C, Lobby Level From Efficacy to Effectiveness - Assessment and Treatment of CFS --> Chair: C. Reeves, MD, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA --> Trudie Chalder, PhD, MSc, Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; --> White, MD, Psychiatry, Barts and the London, Queen School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom; --> Heim, PhD, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA Discussant: Heim, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Trudie Chalder, PhD, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry King's College London, London, United Kingdom; White, MD, Barts and the London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom Table 9 --> CFIDS Association/Centers for Disease Control The CFS Provider Education Project is a CDC-supported multifaceted medical education program focused on diagnosis and care management of persons affected with chronic fatigue syndrome. Symposium #19 10:00 am - 11:30 am Admission by name badge. land Suite A, Lobby Level --> Biobehavioral Linkages in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome --> Chair: C. Reeves, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA --> Presenters: C. Reeves, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; --> F. , MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; --> Suzanne Vernon, PhD, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA Discussant: C. Reeves, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; F. , MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Suzanne Vernon, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 3424 --> MEMORY FOR FATIGUE IN CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME: RELATIONSHIPS TO SYMPTOM VARIABILITY, CATASTROPHIZING AND NEGATIVE AFFECT J. Sohl, MA1 and Fred Friedberg, PhD2 1Social/Health Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY --> and 2Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY. In the absence of a definitive biomedical test for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), symptom self-reports have assumed much greater importance in behavioral assessments and physician office visits. In -->an effort to quantify the differences between what patients ~remember about their fatigue~ as compared to the fatigue levels they actually experience, experience sampling methods have been used. This ecological study hypothesized that recall of fatigue in CFS will be related to (a) the variability of momentary (real-time) fatigue ratings and ( the psychological variables of catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression. In addition, it was expected that © -->catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression would be associated with the intensity of momentary fatigue. Subjects were fifty-three adults with CFS who carried electronic diaries for three weeks to assess their momentary ratings of fatigue. Retrospective fatigue intensity was measured with weekly recall ratings of momentary reports. Standardized questionnaires for catastrophizing, depression, and anxiety were also administered. Results partially confirmed our first hypothesis: Higher variability of momentary fatigue was related to recall of higher fatigue levels relative to average momentary fatigue ratings (week 1: r = ..46, p < .002; week 2: r = .33, p < .05). However, the week 3 correlation was non-significant (r = .04, p = ns). Our second hypothesis was also partially confirmed: Higher levels of catastrophizing (r = -.37; p <.05) and depression (r = - ..36; p <.05) were associated with more accurate recall of momentary fatigue. Finally, catastrophizing (r = .47, p < .001) and anxiety (r = .46; p <.001) were significantly related to the intensity of momentary fatigue. These findings suggest that fatigue measured in real time is related to modifiable psychological factors that can be identified in behavioral and medical assessments. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: J. Sohl, MA, Social/Health Psychology, Stony Brook University, Port Jefferson, NY, 11777; .Sohl@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.