Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 Hi Dave: I must respectfully disagree with your statement that UV ozone producing methods don't produce NOx, unless of course you have some hard data showing otherwise. If the UV energy is strong enough to produce ozone, and there is nitrogen present, then NOx will also be produced. It may not be as much as with a corona discharge, but that's only because the corona discharge method is more powerful. Even if we were to grant that ozone is produced without NOx, and this sterilizes the immediate area around the frequency device, this in no way explains the MOR effect under a microscope slide, a plugged test tube, or sealed ampules threaded through a large chunk of horse meat, or deep inside a person or experimental animal. Also, Rife didn't used quartz tubes exclusively; he also used Pyrex. I don't recall any information showing that quartz tubes were more effective than Pyrex tubes. And incidentally, 640 nm is not UV, but is in the visible band. Ozone would also not explain the reported demonstration of the MOR effect through a concrete floor. Helium was most likely used because it has more resistance and will run at a higher voltage, producing a stronger electric field and more energetic plasma. I think the points listed above are sufficient to indicate that the Rife MOR effect has nothing to do with any ozone that might be produced by a plasma tube or any other ozone producing equipment that Rife had as part of his early experiments. I also don't recall any modern researcher demonstrating the MOR effect with an ozone producing system. We'll do far better if we stick with Rife's description of " hunt and try " to find a frequency that will destroy the particular microorganism that we're working on. Regards, A. Trebing wrote: > , List, > > During electrical corona discharge ozone and harmful nitrites are formed and increase with humidity. Ozone producing UV quartz tubes do not produce these oxides as the ozone is produced in a different manner than electrical corona discharge. Unless the amount of ozone is very high in a small room with little circulation. UV tubes have benefits that may have illicited the Rife effect or had been instrumental in it's use. > The ozone produced by the helium quartz tubes we use in the IR/BPT-500 system is sufficient enough to sterilize the immediate area around the frequency device. > Why did Rife use UV transparent tubes and why helium?. Possible reasons are important to note. > We are not sure about mechanisms involved in the increased effects from the use of the quartz ozone producing tubes. Although we have not researched the detailed effects from the UV it is evident that the helium has a single strong spectral emission in the (?) 640 NM. band. The energy from the spectral emission is compromised of an electromagnetic component and will carry modulated frequencies with the UV light into the skin a few mm. This Surly will have effects topically and on blood cells via the surface capillaries. > There is so many mechanisms to frequency device effects but Rife's work focused around resonant effects and this is where Vibrnthealths work and research is centered. > Our systems are designed with hand manufactured components from Jim Bare's 500KHZ bandwidth OM-1 modulator to Motorolas 300 watt linear amplifier and Atlier Robins 1 megahertz F-100 fully programmable frequency generator. > As stated by Ringas many times the fundamental frequencies are necessary to the effects. In Jim Bare's paper " Understanding Our Frequencies Through Harmonic Associations " we read how important fundamental frequencies are in creating enough power for effects. > At this time most Rife Lab frequencies can be used by the IR/BPT-500 system or the first harmonic that may still have sufficient power for effects. > > Thank you and please contribute any ideas that may help in understanding and improving research and development of Rife's wonderful work. > > Dave and Kathy Trebing > Rife Technologies http://www.home.earthlink.net/~vibrnthealth >> vibrnthealth@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 RE: 's comment: NO production using UV. I agree that the production of NO is present when modulating ambient air with UV to fracture the oxygen molecule into ozone. UV lamps are broad spectrum and emit energy throughout most of the UV spectrum. Low pressure quartz UV lamps will emit UV-C, borosilicate glass like Pyrex will not. The peak for low pressure mecury is at 253.7 nanometers aka 2357 Angstroms. Ozone has a peak around 189 nonometers. Ambient air should not be used for ozone production that is applied medically to the body. Ozone produced by UV is insufficient in quantity to be of much benefit and the NO that comes along with it is not desirable for treating medical afflictions. Only compressed oxygen should be used. Don't mess with oxygen concentrators as the output gas is difficult to regulate and accurate metered gas flows are required for proper ozone production. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 A. Trebing wrote: <snip> > Cold plasma UV ozone production doesn't produce nitrous oxide and is the cleanest way to produce ozone. If researched this is one of the major benefits of cold plasma ozone generators. I'm no chemist but I would think that the UV wavelength reacts with the oxygen but not nitrogen etc. > Cold plasma and UV are two different methods of ozone generation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_generator I also did a search on UV ozone NOx, and there were many pages dealing with NOx produced in the upper atmosphere from the UV coming from the sun. Also, UV ozone generation is the weakest of the three methods. It is usually used when a steady and low concentration of ozone is needed. <snip> > Ozone has nothing to do with the MOR effect. The MOR (Rife) effect is a common resonant reaction used in high tech manufacturing, medicine, research, etc. very often in chemical reactions to cooking hamburger in a micro. Rife opened up the door for frequency devices that will effect all kinds of variable factors beneficial to healing. Fair enough, but this thread was dealing with the assertion that ozone was responsible for the Rife effect. That is what the person who started this thread claimed. <snip> > Helium is one of the few gases with an intense characteristic spectral line at 420 (?)NM UV, surface penetrating to tissue. Light is used often as a carrier in communications. <snip> 420 nm is in the visible range. UV starts at about 380 nm and goes down from there. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Ken Whilst I agree with you about the power of the mind and that any therapy can use this effect I think it extremely unlikely that Rife did no more than that. If you look at the evidence then I think that Rife did indeed find resonant frequencies for things and kill them that way. I also find no difficulty in why it difficult to replicate in that many of the machine still use his derived frequencies. The organisms he researched will have changed to some extent and therefore so will their mortal occultation rate. Then you have the question of the accuracy of his measurements to consider. Someone needs to go back to seeing the organisms again via a powerful optical microscope and empirically finding mortal occultation rates, then and only then will we see his work replicated. Trouble is who wants to do that, not the cancer industry for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 One simple statement. Think of those of us who have successfully used Rife frequencies on our animals. Animals do not anticipate any particular reaction. Therefore, if there is a positive outcome it cannot possibly attributed to some sort of " placebo " effect. Jan Bolen ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool. http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 i must say too that belief is not the say all end all of reality. i have a personal friend who got ovarian cancer (one of the most deadly kinds) and survived just fine; i asked her how her attitude was at the time and she said " she thought she was gonna die! " likewise, i knew another person with terminal brain cancer who proclaimed positively that she was absolutely gonna beat it. she soon kicked the bucket. it's not just health related either. i once said i'd probably never meet girls at the health club and then very next day a girl gave me her phone #. a friend of mine met his wife when he was at VA Beach 4th of July and observed a beautiful woman with another couple friends. he got tired of watching her and said to himself " time to go get shot down " and approached her and instead of getting shot down she layed out a blanket and invited him to sit with them and talk. months later they were married. you just never know. i do think the effects of placebo can be very powerful but i have peronsally observed that the effects are short lived and last only several weeks at best and that is one good way of seeing if something is truly long term workable or short term placebo. jason > > Hi , > > > > I have another theory on the Rife Effect :-) > > > > I have just watch a 2.5 hour video presentation by Bruce Lipton, Ph.D and M.A. > > http://psych-k.com/video.php > > > > It was clearly displayed that our entire body's 50 trillion to 80 trillion cells, and the DNA and genetics in them are ONLY effected by our subconscious beliefs. Nothing else matters and all else is secondary and doesn't have much impact on the biology or physiology of our body as our subconscious beliefs do. > > > > This is the latest science in cellular health and is now basic scientific fact. > > > > This may be why Dr Bare, Dr Loyd, and all the Rife Doctors and vendors are so successful in healing people. > > > > Their sheer confidence in this technology, is transferred to some of the people who build and purchase these machines, and when they turn them on and run a few sessions and their subconscious feels the frequency energy coming from these Rife type machines, that this energy communication is enough to instruct peoples subconscious into changing to believing it is going to be healed by these devices. > > > > It has been now proven beyond doubt, that when this type of change is made in people, and the subconscious can be instantly reprogrammed into knowing the body is going to be healed, that the body can basically heal extremely quickly, from just about any type of disease or disorder. > > > > I feel sure the Rife Effect is tied up in this process somewhere. > > > > If people don't subconsciously believe that Rife machines are going to heal them, then they wont get healed, and this modality is false to them, but for those people that do believe on a subconscious level that they will be healed by these machines, then infact they will be healed. > > > > This may explain why the Rife Effect seems so elusive to so many, it only happens when the subconscious belief changes. > > > > Sincerely, > > Ken Uzzell > > http://heal-me.com.au > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Jan Bolen wrote: > One simple statement. Think of those of us who have successfully used Rife frequencies on our animals. Animals do not anticipate any particular reaction. Therefore, if there is a positive outcome it cannot possibly attributed to some sort of " placebo " effect. > You make a very good point, but as I've been pointing out for so many years, the frequencies we are currently using are not " Rife " . None of the frequencies we use today have been established according to Rife's methodology. A limited exception is some of the frequencies established for Lyme disease by Doug MacLean with his coil device. So, while your point is valid, it doesn't really have anything to do with the " Rife effect " , which is the subject of this thread. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2007 Report Share Posted June 13, 2007 Hi , Thanks for this. It becomes easier to understand since discribed the Rife Effect. So those researchers that have been able to video tape " pond bugs " exploding when exposed to frequency is in fact the Rife Effect outside the body. Where it appears to be hard, is doing this with bacteria and virus, which I understand are much smaller than " pond bugs " ? In the body, it is much more difficult to know what is going on. An example here is a person has a herpes outbreak on the arm. When exposed to certain frequencies from the CAFL, there is a great tingling sensation, directly at the outbreak site, and shortly after, the herpes fades and goes away. If this is done aggressively, then the herpes can stay away for many years. This does appear we are directly affecting the herpes virus in the body, and its remission for such extended periods seems to qualify this. If it was a physiological effect, then I wouldn't have thought the sensation wouldn't be directly at the herpes site. The same can be said for cancer tumors, often there is a senstation right at the cancer tumor site while being exposed to certain frequencies. Ken Uzzell http://heal-me.com.au Re: Rife Effects > We used to see this sort of thing when I was investigating classical > radionic instruments 30 years ago. > > Two points may be worth noting. You mentioned our faith in all things > technological. This was a perceived advantage of radionics, and why > it was favorably linked to emerging radio technologies back in the > 1920's. In fact, the devices produced by Drown, Copan and De La Warr, > etc. made little sense electronically. They were closer to > sympathetic magic. One manufacturer even soldered in PCB's from > unrelated equipment to enhance the effect. De La Warr > successfully made photographic images of internal organs using little > more than a saliva sample, light bulb and bank of tuning resistors. > Apparently, no one else could replicate it. > > Secondly, and in spite of the above, we found devices that were > electrically energized in _any_ way worked better. This was > attributed to both the practitioner and the subject being within the > same energy field. In other words, it set up a mutual resonance for > transfer of information, even over great distance. The distinction > between technology and its operator is still real but indefinite. > Similar devices are sold today, often with an updated quantum belief > system attached. > > There may, in truth, be a small element of the above in any healing > modality. Unfortunately, on the Wikipedia " radionics " page I found a > link to " Royal Rife " . Have a look here if you think they are > related. > > http://www.radionic.co.uk/ > > Nielsen > > >>The following week we meet, and we sit together >>through the Rife session, and bingo, same frequencies, lots of hits and he >>moves forward again with his health. >> >>There is something happening here, and I bet most people experienced with >>Rife type machines have personally experienced this type of response >>sometimes. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2007 Report Share Posted June 13, 2007 Hello Group; Just thought I would add my two cents on faith and believing. I live in Tulsa, OK, home of Oral University(ORU) and Rhema Bible School. At ORU's Hour of Healing program with we see 20 to 30 medically documented healings from cancer per month. (Oral's son) will not put a cancer healing testimony on the air unless it has been medically documented. That's what I like about him, He says if God has really healed you through his prayers, it will show up on an MRI. He and his father Oral believe in a combination of prayer and medical science. As far as how much your faith in God matters for your healing, I have known people personally who had basically very little faith and were healed by God through the laying on of hands at Rhema from Hep C, Aids and Cancer. On the other hand I've seen people who had alot of faith in God, die in faith, looking for God to heal them, including niece la(colon cancer). I do personally think it is important to have faith in God, and have a positive attitude and talk positive, but I also think God is sovreign and heals who he wills for his own reasons. If your interested in experiencing the healing power of God in your geography visit www.healingrooms.com for a healing room in your area, they are completely free of charge. From my experience try a couple different ones because they very in power levels. P.S. - Don't knock it till you've tried it. > > i must say too that belief is not the say all end all of reality. i > have a personal friend who got ovarian cancer (one of the most deadly > kinds) and survived just fine; i asked her how her attitude was at > the time and she said " she thought she was gonna die! " likewise, i > knew another person with terminal brain cancer who proclaimed > positively that she was absolutely gonna beat it. she soon kicked > the bucket. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.