Guest guest Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 Miscarriages greater after boy babies Main Category: Pregnancy News <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/sections/pregnancy/> Article Date: 02 Jul 2003 - 0:00am (PDT) view all opinions on this <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/youropinions.php?associatednewsid=3872> write an opinion on this <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/voiceyouropinion.php?associatednewsid=3872> sign up to our weekly newsletter <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/newsletters.php> Sign up for news alerts <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/newsalerts.php> Women whose first child is a boy are more likely to suffer multiple miscarriages as they try for their next child, say doctors. However, a simple injection could overcome the problem - an immune reaction to proteins unique to male foetuses and their placentas. Thousands of women in the UK have repeated, unexplained miscarriages, and many scientists believe that an overreaction by the immune system could be to blame for many of them. A scientist from Copenhagen in Denmark studied more than 200 women who had suffered at least three miscarriages following the birth of their first child. Significantly more of these first children were male than female - immediately highlighting a possible link between gender and miscarriage risk. In fact, women who had given birth to a boy were more than a third less likely to have managed another successful pregnancy than those who had given birth to a girl. Dr Ole Christiansen, who led the study, said: 'Giving birth to a son is known already to be a prognostically negative factor in many obstetrical complications. 'There are patients who will never get a second child in both groups, but the risk is larger among women whose first child was a boy. 'These women may have raised an immunological reaction against tissue types that are expressed on the surface of the placenta in pregnancies with boys. Immune attack 'The placenta is created from the foetus and if is a boy it will carry these male-specific tissue types. 'The mother's immune system may be reacting by forming antibodies, but also the mother's white blood cells may be reacting against the placenta.' Treatment hope However, there is already a possible solution to this - studies have shown that infusing women who have had recurrent miscarriages with a drug called immunoglobulin raises the live birth rate. However, the studies show that it does not improve her prospects if she has never had a child - suggesting that the birth of the first child is a key factor in an unwanted immune response. Dr Christiansen said: 'I believe that we already have a quite efficient treatment, as our trials have shown.' .................................................................................\ ............................................................. Stress induces miscarriages of males Submitted by Kambiz Kamrani <http://anthropology.net/user/kambiz_kamrani> on February 2, 2006 - 6:57pm. A new study lead by Ralph Catalano <http://sph.berkeley.edu/faculty/catalano.htm> and Tim Bruckner of the UC Berkeley School of Public Health <http://sph.berkeley.edu/> has been published in last week's issue of PNAS, " Secondary sex ratios and male lifespan: Damaged or culled cohorts <http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/5/1639> " that has interesting implications on human evolution, reproduction, sex & gender, populations as well as taboo topics like infanticide. Here is the abstract: " Population stressors reportedly reduce the human secondary sex ratio (i.e., the odds of a newborn's being male) by, among other mechanisms, inducing the spontaneous abortion of males who would have been born live had mothers not been stressed. Controversy remains as to whether these abortions result from reduced maternal tolerance of males at the low end of a relatively constant distribution of survivability (i.e., the " culled cohort " explanation) or from shifts in the whole distribution of survivability such that more males fall below a relatively constant criterion of maternal tolerance for low survivability (i.e., the " damaged cohort " explanation). These alternatives make opposing predictions regarding the relationship between the secondary sex ratio and lifespan of male birth cohorts. We test the hypothesis that the secondary sex ratio among Swedish cohorts born in the years 1751 through 1912 predicts male cohort life expectancy at birth (i.e., realized lifespan). Our results support the culled cohort argument. We argue that these findings have implications for the basic literature concerned with temporal variation in the secondary sex ratio, for more applied work concerned with the fetal origins of adult health, and for pubic health surveillance. " Previous studies have linked the decline in male births to political unrest, natural disasters, environmental changes, and economic recessions. Bruckner and Catalano's data support the idea that stressed mothers' bodies may develop a mechanism to reject especially weak male offspring whom they might have otherwise carried to term. In general, male fetuses are slightly weaker than females and a bit less likely to survive to birth and changes in a woman's body chemistry when she is subject to stress can affect males in the womb more than females. A coinciding theory argues that outside stresses cause a mother's body to develop a lower tolerance for especially weak males and Catalano and Bruckner believe they have evidence for this second theory based on studies of the life spans of babies born during times of societal upheaval. The results support the behaviorial ecological notion that the bodies of mothers under pressure reject weaker babies in favor of ones that can survive in a harsh environment. Furthermore, in times of stress, it would be more beneficial for females to survive because of the limited eggs they have throughout their life times. Though, Catalano and Bruckner's research does not contribute to the broader goal of understanding why babies are born male or female, their research contributes to understanding the effects of stress on the survival of offspring. Trackback URL for this post: http://anthropology.net/trackback/292 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.