Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: new here-- stevens johnson/mycoplasma/pneumonia

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

----Original Message Follows----

From: " thesangreal " <vze3f7wf@...>

>I continue to believe that there

is an underlying problem that isn't being addressed. My son came back

with very high metal levels in hair although he didn't qualify for

>high mercury counts according to " Andy's counting rules " Don't know

if this is familiar to you. Anyway, may I ask how long you did it

>for and how many times? We just ran a fecal metals test on my son and

are waiting for results. Doctor wants us to try something less

>aggressive than DMSA first but I am not sure if it will work.

>Kim in MD

Kim,

The whole mercury thing has changed. Before they used to say they had

elevated levels that proved mercury poisoning. Since that really wasn't the

case......the new thing is that they have very low levels because they're

not excreting metals. Considering the results from chelating kids with

" verified " lead poisoning, it's probably much safer to settle down the

immune system, which improves metabolism...... so the body can excrete

things naturally. Also I'd highly advise not doing any treatment unless

under the care of someone with formal medical training.

Cheryl

Note that Haley (who everyone is quoting lately) is one of the authors. My

son had numerous elevated levels that the results said combined were bad.

Mercury was low. My son has gotten better with treatment for and

without chelation or potentially dangerous megadosing of supplements.

Int J Toxicol. 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):277-85.

Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children.

Holmes AS, Blaxill MF, Haley BE.

SafeMinds, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Reported rates of autism have increased sharply in the United States and the

United Kingdom. One possible factor underlying these increases is increased

exposure to mercury through thimerosal-containing vaccines, but vaccine

exposures need to be evaluated in the context of cumulative exposures during

gestation and early infancy. Differential rates of postnatal mercury

elimination may explain why similar gestational and infant exposures produce

variable neurological effects. First baby haircut samples were obtained from

94 children diagnosed with autism using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM IV) criteria and 45 age- and

gender-matched controls. Information on diet, dental amalgam fillings,

vaccine history, Rho D immunoglobulin administration, and autism symptom

severity was collected through a maternal survey questionnaire and clinical

observation. Hair mercury levels in the autistic group were 0.47 ppm versus

3.63 ppm in controls, a significant difference. The mothers in the autistic

group had significantly higher levels of mercury exposure through Rho D

immunoglobulin injections and amalgam fillings than control mothers. Within

the autistic group, hair mercury levels varied significantly across mildly,

moderately, and severely autistic children, with mean group levels of 0.79,

0.46, and 0.21 ppm, respectively. Hair mercury levels among controls were

significantly correlated with the number of the mothers' amalgam fillings

and their fish consumption as well as exposure to mercury through childhood

vaccines, correlations that were absent in the autistic group. Hair

excretion patterns among autistic infants were significantly reduced

relative to control.

These data cast doubt on the efficacy of traditional hair analysis as a

measure of total mercury exposure in a subset of the population. In light of

the biological plausibility of mercury's role in neurodevelopmental

disorders, the present study provides further insight into one possible

mechanism by which early mercury exposures could increase the risk of

autism.

PMID: 12933322 [PubMed - in process]

_________________________________________________________________

Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage.

http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, all

Every fully vaccinated child has had 237 micrograms of mercury by 18 months.

You can't inject that much mercury in a child and expect it not to have any

negative effect on them. According to CDC, in order for that amount to be a

safe consumption for you child, your child would have to way over 400 pounds.

If your child is suffering neurological damage, chelating is certainly

necessary. DON'T WAIT. If your child is not suffering any consequences due to

mercury poisoning (some kids don't pay consequences until much later in life),

then you should leave them alone. Otherwise, you do take the risk of that

mercury getting moved around to other parts of the body...and that can be

dangerous. An autistic child should most certainly get all the mercury AND

ALUMINUM taken out. According to CDC, a child should only have .85 ml of

aluminum. In one visit with all recommended vaccines a child gets 1.13ml

It only takes 35 mcg of mercury to kill a rabbit...the little bit in your

thermometer is enough to pollute a 20 acre lake. Autism has taken an over 500%

increase in the past ten years. California used to be 1 in 10,000. Now it's 1

in 150 children. Autism is diagnosed to 9 children a day seven days a week

nationwide.

According to CDC all the mercury has been taken out....according to many

scientist (pro vaccine...but for safe vaccines), know otherwise. All you have

to do is read the package inserts. www.vaccinesafety.edu has a thimerosal table

that lists the amount of mercury in each vaccine.

My son is constantly complaining of chest pains. I know it's mercury poisoning

because, for whatever reason, that's where the mercury likes to go. Many

cardiac diseases are due to mercury poisoning. A friend was recently diagnosed

with mercury poisoning of her heart. This explains why more children are having

heart attacks. Not because of bad diet as much as it is mercury poisoning. My

son had 237 mcg of mercury. Mercury does not like leaving the body which is why

it won't be found to be high in the fecal metals count. Hair analysis is one of

the best tests. If your son is having problems due to mercury....I encourage

you find someone willing to help you get that mercury out ASAP before his

problems progress.

Sincerely,

Kimberley

ChristianityandVaccinations_AZvac-lib/

DiseasesandVaccinationsDatabase/

RE: Re: new here-- stevens johnson/mycoplasma/pneumonia

Kim,

The whole mercury thing has changed. Before they used to say they had

elevated levels that proved mercury poisoning. Since that really wasn't the

case......the new thing is that they have very low levels because they're

not excreting metals. Considering the results from chelating kids with

" verified " lead poisoning, it's probably much safer to settle down the

immune system, which improves metabolism...... so the body can excrete

things naturally. Also I'd highly advise not doing any treatment unless

under the care of someone with formal medical training.

Cheryl

Note that Haley (who everyone is quoting lately) is one of the authors. My

son had numerous elevated levels that the results said combined were bad.

Mercury was low. My son has gotten better with treatment for and

without chelation or potentially dangerous megadosing of supplements.

----Original Message Follows----

From: " thesangreal " <vze3f7wf@...>

>I continue to believe that there

is an underlying problem that isn't being addressed. My son came back

with very high metal levels in hair although he didn't qualify for

>high mercury counts according to " Andy's counting rules " Don't know

if this is familiar to you. Anyway, may I ask how long you did it

>for and how many times? We just ran a fecal metals test on my son and

are waiting for results. Doctor wants us to try something less

>aggressive than DMSA first but I am not sure if it will work.

>Kim in MD

_________________________________________________________________

Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

opinion of the Research Institute.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To visit your group on the web, go to: /

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

Certainly, if your son has mercury in his chest cavity causing chest pain an

x-ray would be warrented to confirm this. What does you Dr. think of this? I

recently read an article in a medical journal about a man who attempted suicide

with mercury. This mans x-rays (which were published) showed the mercury all

over his chest and lungs.

===thread truncated===

Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

opinion of the Research Institute.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To visit your group on the web, go to: /

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a radiology tech and I can say I've never heard of or seen what was

interpreted as mercury in the lungs or heart....seen absestos, knives,

bullets, and all kinds of other wierd stuff in the chest cavity, but never

mercury.

It would take a whole lot of it to show up, I'd imagine.

Becky

Re: Re: new here-- stevens johnson/mycoplasma/pneumonia

> ,

> Certainly, if your son has mercury in his chest cavity causing chest pain

an x-ray would be warrented to confirm this. What does you Dr. think of

this? I recently read an article in a medical journal about a man who

attempted suicide with mercury. This mans x-rays (which were published)

showed the mercury all over his chest and lungs.

>

>

> ===thread truncated===

>

>

>

> Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

> the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

> opinion of the Research Institute.

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

> To visit your group on the web, go to: /

>

>

>

>

> Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

> the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

> opinion of the Research Institute.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elemental mercury would certainly show up, like most other metals. This

would be large amounts, as you point out, compared to the very small

amounts of other forms that may be toxic (methylmercury, etc) and not

visible on an X-ray,

I believe the case being discussed is in

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Oct;75(8):581-6. Epub 2002 Jul 06.

This case involves the intravenous injection of 8 g elemental mercury.

S. G. Kahler

>>> beckeric@... 02/20/04 12:05PM >>>

I'm a radiology tech and I can say I've never heard of or seen what was

interpreted as mercury in the lungs or heart....seen absestos, knives,

bullets, and all kinds of other wierd stuff in the chest cavity, but

never mercury. It would take a whole lot of it to show up, I'd imagine.

Becky

Re: Re: new here-- stevens

johnson/mycoplasma/pneumonia

> ,

> Certainly, if your son has mercury in his chest cavity causing chest

pain an x-ray would be warrented to confirm this. What does you Dr. think

of this? I recently read an article in a medical journal about a man who

attempted suicide with mercury. This mans x-rays (which were

published) showed the mercury all over his chest and lungs.

===thread truncated===

___________________________________________________

Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

opinion of the Research Institute.

----------------------------------------------------

To visit your group on the web, go to: /

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, if I remember correctly the article was published in the journal-

Courtland Forum either Jan. or Feb 2004 issue.

Re: Re: new here-- stevens johnson/mycoplasma/pneumonia

Elemental mercury would certainly show up, like most other metals. This

would be large amounts, as you point out, compared to the very small

amounts of other forms that may be toxic (methylmercury, etc) and not

visible on an X-ray,

I believe the case being discussed is in

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Oct;75(8):581-6. Epub 2002 Jul 06.

This case involves the intravenous injection of 8 g elemental mercury.

S. G. Kahler

===thread truncated===

__________________________________________________

Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

opinion of the Research Institute.

----------------------------------------------------

To visit your group on the web, go to: /

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...