[Fwd: e-Speaks: IMFAR Conference; Science Updates; Spring Walks]

[Guest guest]

I do not agree. We did not see high mercury levels with a hair test or

standard blood test. It wasn't UNTIL we did IV chelation that mercury

and lead came out in high numbers. I'm not stupid, I've been around the

block a few times and I can tell you that chelation has had more

beneficial results for my child than all the other therapies combined

that I have ever tried. My child can read faces for basic emotions or

least he can now...I like Autism Speaks but I think they cannot ignore

that mercury does damage and can do damage for a long time even after

the shot is given. This could explain why some children have a severe

decline after shots are given and why some children decline steadily

instead of all at once. I just cannot believe that any doctor would

consider his research complete without studying chelation results

especially in children who do not make Glutithione and are unable to

dispose of toxins genetically. Can they be this narrow minded to save

vaccines? Trina

[Guest guest]

My son is 2 years and 10 months old. I understand that Thimerosol has been

removed from most vaccines already, but I haven't been able to find out when it

was removed. Can anyone tell me if it is likely that he has been exposed to

mercury in his vaccines?

I also understand that mercury is still in some of the flu shots. He did get a

flu shot in October (after I discussed with the doctor and we both decided he

didn't need one, the nurse or medical assistant-not sure what he was, gave him

the shot anyway. I was mad!),

Thanks for any help

Marilyn

[Fwd: e-Speaks: IMFAR Conference; Science

Updates; Spring Walks]

I do not agree. We did not see high mercury levels with a hair test or

standard blood test. It wasn't UNTIL we did IV chelation that mercury

and lead came out in high numbers. I'm not stupid, I've been around the

block a few times and I can tell you that chelation has had more

beneficial results for my child than all the other therapies combined

that I have ever tried. My child can read faces for basic emotions or

least he can now...I like Autism Speaks but I think they cannot ignore

that mercury does damage and can do damage for a long time even after

the shot is given. This could explain why some children have a severe

decline after shots are given and why some children decline steadily

instead of all at once. I just cannot believe that any doctor would

consider his research complete without studying chelation results

especially in children who do not make Glutithione and are unable to

dispose of toxins genetically. Can they be this narrow minded to save

vaccines? Trina

Recent Activity

a.. 6New Members

b.. 1New Files

Visit Your Group

[Guest guest]

Marilyn,

The only way to be 100% sure that your child is not receiving a shot with

Thimerosol in it, is to look at the bottle. If you see a little skull &

crossbones on it, it has Thimerosol in it. Amazingly, they put that on so

that if the bottle gets dropped & broken, they can clean it properly, as

mercury is a biohazard. But then they will turn around an inject it into

your kid. It's amazing.

Anne

-- Re: [Fwd: e-Speaks: IMFAR Conference;

Science Updates; Spring Walks]

My son is 2 years and 10 months old. I understand that Thimerosol has been

removed from most vaccines already, but I haven't been able to find out when

it was removed. Can anyone tell me if it is likely that he has been exposed

to mercury in his vaccines?

I also understand that mercury is still in some of the flu shots. He did get

a flu shot in October (after I discussed with the doctor and we both decided

he didn't need one, the nurse or medical assistant-not sure what he was,

gave him the shot anyway. I was mad!),

Thanks for any help

Marilyn

[Fwd: e-Speaks: IMFAR Conference; Science

Updates; Spring Walks]

I do not agree. We did not see high mercury levels with a hair test or

standard blood test. It wasn't UNTIL we did IV chelation that mercury

and lead came out in high numbers. I'm not stupid, I've been around the

block a few times and I can tell you that chelation has had more

beneficial results for my child than all the other therapies combined

that I have ever tried. My child can read faces for basic emotions or

least he can now...I like Autism Speaks but I think they cannot ignore

that mercury does damage and can do damage for a long time even after

the shot is given. This could explain why some children have a severe

decline after shots are given and why some children decline steadily

instead of all at once. I just cannot believe that any doctor would

consider his research complete without studying chelation results

especially in children who do not make Glutithione and are unable to

dispose of toxins genetically. Can they be this narrow minded to save

vaccines? Trina

Recent Activity

a.. 6New Members

b.. 1New Files

Visit Your Group

[Guest guest]

Hi Anne,

At the time he got his shots, I had no idea he could have autism, so of course,

I didn't look at anything. He won't be getting any more shots!

Marilyn

Re: [Fwd: e-Speaks: IMFAR Conference; Science

Updates; Spring Walks]

Marilyn,

The only way to be 100% sure that your child is not receiving a shot with

Thimerosol in it, is to look at the bottle. If you see a little skull &

crossbones on it, it has Thimerosol in it. Amazingly, they put that on so

that if the bottle gets dropped & broken, they can clean it properly, as

mercury is a biohazard. But then they will turn around an inject it into

your kid. It's amazing.

Anne

Recent Activity

a.. 9New Members

b.. 1New Files

Visit Your Group