Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Chris- >As far as I have been aware of such advice, the advice has been that >pregnant women should fight the urge to eat more, and have " debunked " >the " myth " that pregnant women eat for two, when in fact the mother >and baby " share " nutrients (which is obviously painfully absurd). Same here. In some circles, in fact, the advice that pregnant women should not gain much and shouldn't " eat for two " goes way back. It was well-established when my mom was pregnant with me, and in fact that's what she was told, but thankfully she ignored it. I think I'm about ten years older than you are, so this nonsense is anything but new. >When I was in elementary >school, whole milk was not even on option. It was skim, or 1%, I >think. I'm not sure if 2% was available, but I know the " regular " >milk definitely was NOT whole milk. I don't remember milk at elementary school (I always brought lunch from home then, not that it was any good) but in high school I'm pretty sure that whole milk wasn't an option, but lowfat (or nonfat?) chocolate milk was. >Well what about the father? The same, AFAIK. Ferberization is a relatively recent (and harmful) practice. I'm not sure exactly how far back the root practice of putting the kid in a separate area goes, but certainly in cave times, the family slept together. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Deanna- >I just read chapter 10 of NAPD. This excerpt is found right before the >one I cited on the grandma native stimulating lactation without >pregnancy, as she was doing the native thing. Basically, the situation >referred to above was indicative of many reservations Price visited. He >found lots of deaths of adults too at these concentration camps. These >poor natives were forced to live and eat government foods. I don't >think the foods were meant to optimize their health, and in fact they >may have deprived the natives of their vitality on purpose. Of course the foods weren't meant to optimize health! So what? Do you think the food most people eat nowadays is meant to optimize their health? >So I don't think it is a fair representation of the population at large, >maybe only the prison population at large. The food they were given was crap. The food prison inmates nowadays are given is crap. The food most people eat today is crap. There's not a whole lot of difference among them. If you're going to dredge up prisons of yore in which rations were a little bread and water or some corn gruel, then, sure, that food was worse than what most people eat today, but it's not an especially relevant comparison. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Irene- >I think it is presumptuous for anyone to second guess a mothers >decision to supplement with formula. Doesn't that depend on the formula? - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 , >Of course the foods weren't meant to optimize health! So what? Do you >think the food most people eat nowadays is meant to optimize their health? > > No. The food most people that I know in my little neck of the woods eat processed convenience foods. I don't frequently see pregnant women and haven't been closely acquainted to one in 3 years. >The food they were given was crap. The food prison inmates nowadays are >given is crap. The food most people eat today is crap. There's not a >whole lot of difference among them. If you're going to dredge up prisons >of yore in which rations were a little bread and water or some corn gruel, >then, sure, that food was worse than what most people eat today, but it's >not an especially relevant comparison. > Yes, I think the comparison is relevant. The quote you made (or pasted from the friend) from page 182 of NAPD referred to babies dying from the milk of their mothers. I just don't see that happening even in SAD folks. When babies die of malnutrition in this country, it makes big headlines. I am sure you remember the family that fed their baby a vegan diet of nut butters and such instead of breast milk or formula in Queens a few years ago. Trust me, I lost a baby and it gets investigated thoroughly for cause. We are not seeing women nursing babies and the babies subsequently dropping dead in this country in any representative numbers, even with a crappy diet. Furthermore, I find the idea that these Aborigines were not* CHOOSING* to feed their babies rubbish and had to watch them die a real stinker for some idea that nursing is bad in general. They were force fed camp food by people that were subjugating them. Even Price says: " One can scarcely visualize, without observing it, the distress of a group of people situated as these people are, compelled to live in a very restricted area, forced to live on food provided by the government, while they are conscious that if they could return to their normal habits of life they would regain their health and again enjoy life. " NAPD, by Price page 179 I think it's safe to say that either 1) the Aborigine concentration camp diet was vastly more nutrient poor than ours, 2) they couldn't handle the *FORCED* switch to foods of commerce as readily as others (or had less time to adapt for whatever reason), and/or 3) there is another factor like toxicity of supplies/environment that was not known or considered by Price. Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Deanna- >Yes, I think the comparison is relevant. The quote you made (or pasted >from the friend) from page 182 of NAPD referred to babies dying from the >milk of their mothers. I just don't see that happening even in SAD >folks. True, but there are two factors involved: nutrient fortification and modern medical intervention. Fortification is bad and useless in many ways, but it does tend to prevent the sort of overt deficiency disease that used to afflict legions of the very poor. In a way it's just masking major problems rather than doing anything really useful, but still, it has an effect. >Furthermore, I find >the idea that these Aborigines were not* CHOOSING* to feed their babies >rubbish and had to watch them die a real stinker for some idea that >nursing is bad in general. Will everyone please stop with this BS straw man that I or anyone else is suggesting that " nursing is bad in general " ? >I think it's safe to say that either 1) the Aborigine concentration camp >diet was vastly more nutrient poor than ours Maybe, but I live in the barrio, and based on what I see, I'm not convinced. Lots of white bread, twinkie-type snack/desserts, hydrogenated oils, vegetable oils, etc. etc. etc. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 , >>Furthermore, I find >>the idea that these Aborigines were not* CHOOSING* to feed their babies >>rubbish and had to watch them die a real stinker for some idea that >>nursing is bad in general. >> >> >Will everyone please stop with this BS straw man that I or anyone else is >suggesting that " nursing is bad in general " ? > > Sorry . I was thinking that using that particular quote from NAPD was off the mark. I didn't mean you, but I shouldn't have generalized. >>I think it's safe to say that either 1) the Aborigine concentration camp >>diet was vastly more nutrient poor than ours >> >> >Maybe, but I live in the barrio, and based on what I see, I'm not >convinced. Lots of white bread, twinkie-type snack/desserts, hydrogenated >oils, vegetable oils, etc. etc. etc. > Well, I grew up in California and entered the health scene through fitness in my teens. So I suppose environment plays a big role in what we perceive average people doing. Out here on the prairie, I have a really hard time visualizing factory farms when all I see are cows lying in the shade midday. It is so hot, but at least recent rains have kept pastures green. Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Deanna- >Well, I grew up in California and entered the health scene through >fitness in my teens. So I suppose environment plays a big role in what >we perceive average people doing. I guess. I have no idea how things are in Texas, but I know that lots of California is very slanted towards vegetarianism and the like. The same is pretty true of NYC, at least in " health food " circles. The middle class eats tons of junk, but it's nothing compared to what poor people eat. There's a supermarket directly across the street from my apartment building. It's convenient for the odd household item, and whenever I go there I'm viscerally horrified by what I see people buying. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2005 Report Share Posted August 27, 2005 , > >I guess. I have no idea how things are in Texas, but I know that lots of >California is very slanted towards vegetarianism and the like. The same is >pretty true of NYC, at least in " health food " circles. > Well, I remember in the 1970s (I'm 40 now) that the surf shops by the beach had avocado and sprout sandwiches on whole wheat with cheese, smoothies and the like. Then in the 80s, it was the beginning of chicken and fish and general lowfat diet propaganda. In the 90s I left and went to many other communities. So honestly, during that time frame, vegetarianism was a fringe idea and I knew no one that was totally meat free, even if " we " ate yogurt and bananas, some tofu and such. Here in TX it's totally different than CA is now, I am sure. This is cattle country. My doctor says about vegetarian diets: " Why do you think God put animals on the planet? " I like Texans, but it's a different country in many ways, lol. In fairness, there is a Ft. Worth vegetarian society and one vegan restaurant. But that's nothing compared to your locale, eh? >The middle class >eats tons of junk, but it's nothing compared to what poor people >eat. There's a supermarket directly across the street from my apartment >building. It's convenient for the odd household item, and whenever I go >there I'm viscerally horrified by what I see people buying. > Yeah, I can understand that. I've lived in towns where you hear gun shots once a week and the nearby food offerings at little independent grocers aren't what I would consider real food. For my rural existence now, I got my chickens from neighbors across the street. I get 3-5 eggs a day from my 5 hens. There's a goat farm at the end of the road, horses breeding is at the other end. We have a small 2 acres compared to most places nearby. Basically, I pass by dozens of livestock operations before I ever hit a market. Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.