Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 Lynn- >4) Today I made some brown rice for breakfast--no gluten contamination >at all--and my stomach is behaving very similarly to the oatmeal! > >So! Is it possible this is just a morning thing? A carb thing? eh? Hmm, could the SCD be rearing its ugly head? <g> - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 > Hmm, could the SCD be rearing its ugly head? <g> <Costello> I have no idea! That's why I'm askin! </Costello> What would make you think that? Lynn S. ------ Lynn Siprelle * web developer, writer, mama, fiber junky http://www.siprelle.com * http://www.thenewhomemaker.com http://www.deanspeaksforme.com * http://www.knitting911.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 Lynn- >What would make you think that? Your trouble with brown rice. I really recommend that you read _Breaking the Vicious Cycle_ by Elaine Gottschall. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 > Your trouble with brown rice. I really recommend that you read > _Breaking > the Vicious Cycle_ by Elaine Gottschall. Just bought it, thanks! Lynn S. ------ Lynn Siprelle * web developer, writer, mama, fiber junky http://www.siprelle.com * http://www.thenewhomemaker.com http://www.deanspeaksforme.com * http://www.knitting911.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >So I was thinking maybe it was gluten intolerance raising its scaly, >ubiquitous head, but now I'm not so sure. > >1) I ate some improperly prepared oatmeal about a week ago and almost >immediately (within minutes of eating) had a v loose stool and was in a >woozy fog for about an hour. Oatmeal usually has gluten in it ... as has been proved in testing. Even the McMann's. The machines that sort the grain really cannot tell wheat from oats: they look identical. 3) I've had a few slices in this time of 100% rye sourdough bread with >absolutely zero symptoms. Sourdoughing really does kill the gluten pretty effectively (TOTALLY in one study using a special bacteria and actual wheat). Plus rye isn't as nasty as wheat. >4) Today I made some brown rice for breakfast--no gluten contamination >at all--and my stomach is behaving very similarly to the oatmeal! Brown rice is a known problem for a lot of people, including us. I have no idea why. Ditto for whole grain sorghum, for my dh but not for me. Probably something else in the husk that makes it hard to deal with. >So! Is it possible this is just a morning thing? A carb thing? eh? Dunno. Try it in the evening? A lot of people have problems with a lot of the grains for one reason or another. I'm beginning to agree more an more with the Paleo folks: grains are just really " iffy " foods. When I do eat them though, it tends to be in the " starch only " format ... which I know is the least nutritious format but is also the most digestible. The Brazilian Indians discovered this with tapioca, and I suspect it is true of corn etc. as well. (corn is also ok if it's soaked in lime, as per masa --- tortillas). But I do that fairly rarely -- birthday cakes etc. Breakfast I think should be something more designed for the human gut ... fruit, fish ... -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 Hi Heidi Jean: In fact, tapioca is flour made from manioc, which is a tuber, as you know. I agree that starches are a lot more digestible when you eat them as tubers rather than grains. However, I've heard paleo people complain about the potato, as if it were too heavy for them to digest it. Well I never! Can you believe that? I can eat meats or eggs at breakfast, when I eat at breakfast, but fish seems so unusual. But I know that the traditional Japanese breakfast includes fish and also soup. In my case, breakfast must include a warm beverage. Have some coffee? Cheers, JC .... > I'm beginning > to agree more an more with the Paleo folks: grains are just > really " iffy " foods. When I do eat them though, it tends to be > in the " starch only " format ... which I know is the least nutritious > format but is also the most digestible. The Brazilian Indians discovered > this with tapioca, and I suspect it is true of corn etc. as well. (corn > is also ok if it's soaked in lime, as per masa --- tortillas). > > But I do that fairly rarely -- birthday cakes etc. Breakfast > I think should be something more designed for the human > gut ... fruit, fish ... > > -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >-----Original Message----- >From: >[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Lynn Siprelle > > >So I was thinking maybe it was gluten intolerance raising its scaly, >ubiquitous head, but now I'm not so sure. > >1) I ate some improperly prepared oatmeal about a week ago and almost >immediately (within minutes of eating) had a v loose stool and was in a >woozy fog for about an hour. Lynn, AFAIK, the woozy fog is characteristic of a food allergy. I'm allergic to cow's milk, and had some sheep milk kefir yesterday (fermented for a week) and got that woozy fog. I don't seem to get that woozy fog if I take my DPP IV enzyme with it though, which breaks down the opioid peptides in casein. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >Hi Heidi Jean: > >In fact, tapioca is flour made from manioc, which is a tuber, as you >know. I agree that starches are a lot more digestible when you eat >them as tubers rather than grains. However, I've heard paleo people >complain about the potato, as if it were too heavy for them to digest >it. Well I never! Can you believe that? Right. Potatoes used to be quite toxic ... they are a member of the nightshade family. They were bred to be less toxic, but some toxins still reside in their skins if they go green. Manioc was quite toxic, I've read, and the natives had to do a lot of processing to extract just the starch. I do eat both tapioca and potatoes though. I disagree with a lot of the Paleo people about tubers, and about sweet fruit. Some of them claim that both were rare in the distant past, but my take is that both were and are very common in the wild, even before they became " highly bred " . Though the potato and manioc were toxic, some other tubers are not, offer a lot of easy calories for little work, and are commonly eaten by wild animals. I think we can assume early humans ate them too. >I can eat meats or eggs at breakfast, when I eat at breakfast, but >fish seems so unusual. But I know that the traditional Japanese >breakfast includes fish and also soup. Fish gets your brain going. I can't say that I DO eat fish for breakfast ... too much work for me at that hour ... but I have in the past and it works great. Now that I have my balsamic ceviche maybe I'll start it up again. >In my case, breakfast must include a warm beverage. Have some coffee? But of course! -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 On 8/24/05, José- s Barbosa <jcmbarbosa52@...> wrote: > Hi Heidi Jean: > > In fact, tapioca is flour made from manioc, which is a tuber, as you > know. I agree that starches are a lot more digestible when you eat > them as tubers rather than grains. However, I've heard paleo people > complain about the potato, as if it were too heavy for them to digest > it. Well I never! Can you believe that? I can tolerate the 100% rye European sourdough that Whole Foods sells quite fine (at least based on perceptible symptoms), whereas I find potatoes are likely to give me gas and rumbling and whatnot. So I don't think that, at least for me, grains are necessarily worse than other starches. Granted, without proper preparation they might be, and Ezekiel bread, which is all sprouted, but has wheat and soy in it, is at least as problematic as potatoes for me it seems. The European sourdough rye and bottle-conditioned beer have been more or less my only gluten for a year or two (with a few periods where I went on to other things, so not continuously). The beer gives me a bloat, though selected non-bottle-conditioned beers give me diarrhea, but the sourdough rye doesn't seem too bad. Nevertheless, I'm off all starches right now for a while, to help maintain the gut healing that the fasting hopefully jump-started. I would like to reintroduce the European sourdough rye at some point, as I love it, and is great for burgers. I really will miss eating burgers topped with bacon between two pieces of buttered sourdough rye toast. But I'm thinking that before I do that, I should come up with the money to get tested for gluten intolerance, and then test antibody levels after reintroducing the sourdough rye if I *am* gluten intolerant. Or, maybe by that time someone will come up with some sourdough rye that is tested for gluten and guaranteed gluten free or something. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 On 8/24/05, Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > Lynn, AFAIK, the woozy fog is characteristic of a food allergy. I'm > allergic > to cow's milk, and had some sheep milk kefir yesterday (fermented for a > week) and got that woozy fog. I don't seem to get that woozy fog if I take > my DPP IV enzyme with it though, which breaks down the opioid peptides in > casein. How long have you been off fasting? This is the seond week for me, and I'm not even planning on reintroducing raw egg yolks for a couple more weeks. I figured I would wait months before introducing non-cow raw fermented milk. My thought is that milk should be banished entirely until the healing process is nearing completion, which probably takes a long time. Introducing other types of milk with a damaged gut could result in an allergy that we might not necessarily have inherently. Right now I'm basically on an egg-free dairy-free nut-free version of the SCD. And some say the SCD is too restrictive! LOL! I did gorge on nuts when I realized I couldn't tolerate them, because I didn't want the nuts I already had bought hanging around the house forever. But I've been nut-free for about a week. You, from your story, apparently don't digest nuts either. For my pleasure food, I have developed two forms of chocolate desserts: The first is a type of hot fudge, which is made from an equal amount of pure chocolate and ghee (ounce to tablespoon) with a heaping teaspoon of raw honey per unit of the former combo. I melt it all together, then let it cool until " warm, " and eat with a spoon. I'm considering trying this on fruit, such as strawberries, or pineapple, which I happen to have in the house now. It is great alone, and probably good with those. The second, which I invented today, was 3 ounces pure chocolate, I'm guessing about 3 T ghee, 3 heaping teaspoons raw honey, a capful of vanilla extract, and then dried, shredded, unsweetened coconut, by the handful until the mixture was saturated with coconut. This was mixed thoroughly, and then flattened on a saucer and refrigerated. Then I peeled up pieces with a knife or spoon to eat with my hands. Yum! Other than that, I only eat meat, fats (ghee, VCO, EVOO), fruits, and vegetables. I also use a 2-year fermented wheat-free tamari, and some supplements (Primal Defense, acetyl-l-carnitine r-lipoic acid). I also have decaf coffee, black, with a teaspoon of honey and a few dashes of cinnamon. Oh, and red wine. Every meal I take 6 capsules HCl/betaine, half after 2 or 3 bites and half half-way, ending with two pancreatin capsules. It's going well so far, and with the coffee and chocolate, those offer comfort foods that keep me from what WOULD become deprivation insanity were I to do such an austere diet without any sort of comfort food. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 On 8/24/05, Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > Lynn, AFAIK, the woozy fog is characteristic of a food allergy. I'm > allergic > to cow's milk, and had some sheep milk kefir yesterday (fermented for a > week) and got that woozy fog. I don't seem to get that woozy fog if I take > my DPP IV enzyme with it though, which breaks down the opioid peptides in > casein. Oh: do sheep produce A2 casein? How do you interpret this experience within the framework of A1/A2? Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >-----Original Message----- >From: >[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Heidi >>I can eat meats or eggs at breakfast, when I eat at breakfast, but >>fish seems so unusual. But I know that the traditional Japanese >>breakfast includes fish and also soup. > >Fish gets your brain going. I can't say that I DO eat fish >for breakfast ... too much work for me at that hour ... but >I have in the past and it works great. Now that I have >my balsamic ceviche maybe I'll start it up again. I often eat ceviche for breakfast, usually using Sockeye salmon or Maine shrimp. Partly because it's so easy to prepare since the fish or shrimp is already soaked in lemon juice (from the night before). I just chop a few veggies and toss 'em in. Le voila! Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >-----Original Message----- >From: >[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Masterjohn > > >On 8/24/05, Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > >> Lynn, AFAIK, the woozy fog is characteristic of a food allergy. I'm >> allergic >> to cow's milk, and had some sheep milk kefir yesterday (fermented for a >> week) and got that woozy fog. I don't seem to get that woozy fog >if I take >> my DPP IV enzyme with it though, which breaks down the opioid peptides in >> casein. > >How long have you been off fasting? Since Saturday. I did 6 days of water only, and added clear veggie broth on day 7. Now looking at what I wrote, I think I was wrong about there even being opioid peptides in sheep's milk. However, it's true that I only felt that woozy feeling a couple of times and certainly not when I take the enzymes. For the first three days everything I ate/drank gave me gut pain, even the clear veggie broth! I couldn't even think about eating solid foods, hence bone broth, sheep kefir and yogurt. I'm battling candida, so I'm *loading* up with probiotics, which is one reason I decided to do the kefir and yogurt (which contains 7 probiotic strains). I also have 5 gallons of EM that I'll be bottling in a few days, AND commercial probiotics on top of that AND I ordered probiotic enema implants. And I just made a 2 qt. jar of kimchi. Do you suppose I have my bases covered? <g> This is the seond week for me, >and I'm not even planning on reintroducing raw egg yolks for a couple >more weeks. I figured I would wait months before introducing non-cow >raw fermented milk. I think I have a problem with eggs so they are off the menu for now. I'm not sure if I'm going to stick with the kefir/yogurt or not. The more I read about the A1/A2 issue though, the more I'm inclined to think the Enterolab test is for A1 casein. Not that it doesn't mean one can't also develop an allergy to A2, but that's a big question mark in my mind. I had some goat chevre today as well, but had absolutely no perceptible reaction. During my fast I thought about cheese alot for some reason, even though I've never been a big cheese person. > >My thought is that milk should be banished entirely until the healing >process is nearing completion, which probably takes a long time. >Introducing other types of milk with a damaged gut could result in an >allergy that we might not necessarily have inherently. I thought of that. I guess it's a little late for that though, because I was consuming these things for a while when my gut was already damaged. But I do always take my DPP IV with them. I believe candida is at the root of my gut problems. And so my focus is mainly on getting rid of it, which is I'm loading up on probiotics of all stripes. And why I can't eat all that honey that you are using as a comfort food. There IS some maple syrup in the yogurt I get, but not much. I stopped drinking decaf coffee months ago, although I love it too. I just didn't like it with canned coconut milk in it. I'm going to make my own coconut cream tomorrow from a coconut, and if it's good, I might try it in decaf for a treat. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >-----Original Message----- >From: >[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Masterjohn > > >On 8/24/05, Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > >> Lynn, AFAIK, the woozy fog is characteristic of a food allergy. I'm >> allergic >> to cow's milk, and had some sheep milk kefir yesterday (fermented for a >> week) and got that woozy fog. I don't seem to get that woozy fog >if I take >> my DPP IV enzyme with it though, which breaks down the opioid peptides in >> casein. > >Oh: do sheep produce A2 casein? How do you interpret this experience >within the framework of A1/A2? They effectively produce only A2 according to the author of the article I posted earlier. I believe it is not *identical* to cow's milk A2, but does not have histidine at postion 67 like A1, so he said something to the effect that it's essentially the same as cow's A2. I've read this in many other places, although I think there's a lot of guessing, speculation, and paraphrasing other sites going on. I don't really have enough info to interpret it to any significant degree. But I keep reading that folks who can't tolerate A1 often *can* tolerate A2, including autistic kids by some accounts. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 > Chris: >I can tolerate the 100% rye European sourdough that Whole Foods sells >quite fine (at least based on perceptible symptoms), whereas I find >potatoes are likely to give me gas and rumbling and whatnot. So I >don't think that, at least for me, grains are necessarily worse than >other starches. Granted, without proper preparation they might be, >and Ezekiel bread, which is all sprouted, but has wheat and soy in it, >is at least as problematic as potatoes for me it seems. > >The European sourdough rye and bottle-conditioned beer have been more >or less my only gluten for a year or two (with a few periods where I >went on to other things, so not continuously). The beer gives me a >bloat, though selected non-bottle-conditioned beers give me diarrhea, >but the sourdough rye doesn't seem too bad. Nevertheless, I'm off all >starches right now for a while, to help maintain the gut healing that >the fasting hopefully jump-started. I DO wish there was a better way to tell which foods are problematic, and why! Back when I was doing food testing, potatoes gave me a fast heartbeat, which might indicate a nightshade problem (and given that nightshades are among my favorite foods, that isn't a good sign). But is it the starch, or the alkaloids, or the proteins? How would I know? True sourdough is thought to be a lot less problematic, which jibes with both tradition and anecdotes. But in long-term studies, the " very low gluten " nonsymptomatic folks don't seem to do as well healthwise as the " zero tolerance NO gluten " folks, so I'm guessing more studies need to be done (plus all the studies are on celiacs, not people who are maybe just a little gluten intolerant). I'd guess there is a large range of reactivities, but since " symptoms " are so subtle or nonexistent it's hard to know what to do. >I would like to reintroduce the European sourdough rye at some point, >as I love it, and is great for burgers. I really will miss eating >burgers topped with bacon between two pieces of buttered sourdough rye >toast. But I'm thinking that before I do that, I should come up with >the money to get tested for gluten intolerance, and then test antibody >levels after reintroducing the sourdough rye if I *am* gluten >intolerant. Yes. Because if you stop eating gluten, you will never get an accurate test. Actually if the only gluten you eat is rye bread and beer, and you are in decent health, you might not get a good test anyway. The main gluten I WAS eating was Wasa rye crisps and porter beer, and my IgA levels came out fairly low (I wasn't all that sick either, by " doctor standards " ... migraines, joint problems, high blood pressure, fast heartbeat, dry mouth etc. are all standard at my age). >Or, maybe by that time someone will come up with some sourdough rye >that is tested for gluten and guaranteed gluten free or something. They already have some in the works. Actually I think rye is a LOT less problematic than wheat, esp. if it's soured. But they have a special bacteria that seems to break down the peptide in question and produce a bread that doesn't act allergenic even in vitro. My guess though is that there will be a " new " wheat in the next decade or two that doesn't have the villanous peptide in it. Might be too late for us folks who react to anything even close to that peptide but you young'uns can have bread again ... -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 On 8/24/05, Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > For the first three days everything I ate/drank gave me gut pain, even the > clear veggie broth! I couldn't even think about eating solid foods, hence > bone broth, sheep kefir and yogurt. I'm battling candida, so I'm *loading* > up with probiotics, which is one reason I decided to do the kefir and > yogurt > (which contains 7 probiotic strains). I also have 5 gallons of EM that I'll > be bottling in a few days, AND commercial probiotics on top of that AND I > ordered probiotic enema implants. And I just made a 2 qt. jar of kimchi. Do > you suppose I have my bases covered? <g> I see your strategy, but I suspect the dairy is counterproductive even if fermented. For example, I don't think I ever got any probiotic benefit from kefired milk, which I think really helped me in terms of sleep and teeth, but really damaged my gut (paradoxically, since that supports a reductionist approach to health that is against my inclinations.) On the other hand, it seemed like kefired young coconut water was very helpful to my gut. I wonder if you should try a non-dairy kefir? > I think I have a problem with eggs so they are off the menu for now. I'm > not > sure if I'm going to stick with the kefir/yogurt or not. Well if you got the big woozy feeling from it, I don't see how you could conclude that you might not have problems with it. I would consider " woozy " a problem. > The more I read > about the A1/A2 issue though, the more I'm inclined to think the Enterolab > test is for A1 casein. Not that it doesn't mean one can't also develop an > allergy to A2, but that's a big question mark in my mind. I think it would be pretty easy if you have a damaged gut. For example, people with leaky guts develop allergies to almost everything they eat. When I was a baby, I couldn't even tolerate fruits and vegetables! > I had some goat > chevre today as well, but had absolutely no perceptible reaction. During my > fast I thought about cheese alot for some reason, even though I've never > been a big cheese person. Interesting. Did you need enzymes for it? My general strategy has been to eliminate the things that I think I may have any problem with. Cheese seems to be ok with enough HCl sometimes, and other times results in rumbling or gas, so it's out completely. Sometimes symptoms are hard to notice, especially if you're used to having symptoms (I was in denial about milk for a couple years, since my digestion was so vastly better than pre-NT, despite still sucking), and as we know from gluten, sometimes damage is asymptomatic. > >My thought is that milk should be banished entirely until the healing > >process is nearing completion, which probably takes a long time. > >Introducing other types of milk with a damaged gut could result in an > >allergy that we might not necessarily have inherently. > I thought of that. I guess it's a little late for that though, because I > was consuming these things for a while when my gut was already damaged. I don't know enough about allergy development to know whether or not that's good reasoning. Isn't it possible that the allergy would take on more permanent characteristics or worsen in magnitude, the greater the magnitude and duration of the allergen exposure? > But I do always take my DPP IV with them. I believe candida is at the root of my > gut problems. And so my focus is mainly on getting rid of it, which is I'm > loading up on probiotics of all stripes. And why I can't eat all that > honey that you are using as a comfort food. There IS some maple syrup in the > yogurt I get, but not much. I stopped drinking decaf coffee months ago, > although I love it too. I just didn't like it with canned coconut milk in > it. I'm going to make my own coconut cream tomorrow from a coconut, and if > it's good, I might try it in decaf for a treat. Are you sure that lactic acid is that toxic to candida? I think I have fungal issues too, but candida diets are supposed to be dairy-free for whatever reason, and free of some particular fermented foods, especially yeast-fermented. I went on an anti-candida diet for a month once that drove me insane and did nothing to clear up my symptoms. In any case, kefir is loaded with carbs, since lactic acid is for any practical purpose a carb. I'm wondering whether the lactic acid is metabolically active for the candida, and just how toxic it is. I'm also wondering if asymptomatic gut damage could outweigh the probiotic benefit. I don't see how you can have coffee but can't have honey. Coffee has 9 grams of carbs per cup, and honey has 4 or 5 per teaspoon. Coconut milk and I think coconut cream also have carbs. I'm not suggesting you add honey into your diet. I'm not really sure what the net effect would be. Honey has antibiotic properties, but it's also sugar. Bruce Fife's VCO fast is supposed to be dramatically more useful in a week than an anti-candida diet for a couple months, and you can get up to 2000 calories a day on it, although it induces lots of diarrhea. Of course it's probably not in order, given your recent water-fasting. But I suspect fatty acids, especially medium-chain, are probably better for anti-candida then lactic acid, which is essentially a carbohydrate. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >But I keep reading that folks who can't tolerate A1 often *can* tolerate A2, >including autistic kids by some accounts. > >Suze Fisher I know one lady who can tolerate goat milk kefir just fine, but not goat milk and not anything with cow milk. I haven't tried goat milk kefir, but goat milk gave me the " chills " big time (and it was very fresh from a grass fed goat next door). The problem with the immune system is that once it gets set off by one peptide, it can " associate " a bunch of related peptides into the same bucket. Like, if you catch a cold, you won't get that virus again AND you won't get some viruses that " look like " the strain you just got. Or if you caught cowpox in the old days you wouldn't catch smallpox. So maybe if you ONLY got A1 protein you'd be ok, but if your system has decided A2 is really bad it might dislike A1 by association. I suspect (no proof at all) that this might be one reason why folks who ate rye and barley mainly didn't end up with major problems, but once they started eating wheat, rye and barley started being problematic also. -- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 On 8/24/05, Heidi <heidis@...> wrote: > > I DO wish there was a better way to tell which > foods are problematic, and why! Back when I > was doing food testing, potatoes gave me a > fast heartbeat, which might indicate a nightshade > problem (and given that nightshades are among > my favorite foods, that isn't a good sign). > But is it the starch, or the alkaloids, or the proteins? How would I know? Good point. My mom has problems with nightshades. > Yes. Because if you stop eating gluten, you will > never get an accurate test. I thought with the enterlabs testing you could test while not on gluten? > Actually if the only > gluten you eat is rye bread and beer, and you > are in decent health, you might not get a good > test anyway. Well I'm not using either right now, and the beer seems to give me a bloat and some tummy rumbling, unlike wine. I'm not sure how to measure " good health. " I don't get the sense that my intestines are in good health, although I seem to be doing well with my egg-free dairy-free nut-free SCD with loads of HCl and enzymes. But my lower abdomen is still distended when relaxed, which indicates a health problem to me. All the previous talking of fecal matter before and suddenly I had to go... seemed very healthy: just firm enough to be very full-formed with integrity, otherwise mildly soft, extremely dark brown, no bits of pieces of anything in it like a few days ago (I think those were the nuts I ate!), and the smell was not only mild, but almost pleasant. LOL! So all the digestive supplements and an austere diet seem to be giving me pretty good digestive health. Though I imagine I could slip back easily by diverging from my diet. By the way... a week or two before my fast I found what appeared to be some blood in my stools. I don't remember whether I mentioned that on list or not. But that's pretty bad, isn't it? So again, I'm not sure I would say I'm " healthy. " > The main gluten I WAS eating was > Wasa rye crisps and porter beer, and my IgA levels > came out fairly low (I wasn't all that sick either, > by " doctor standards " ... migraines, joint problems, > high blood pressure, fast heartbeat, dry mouth etc. > are all standard at my age). Right. I hate this idea of " aging. " At a family get-together last night my uncle's " aging-induced " gut was discussed. Grr. No teeth. Well, that's middle age for you. When I was 17 I asked the opthamologist what would've happened in my body that I suddenly needed glasses, and he said, " Well, you're just getting older. " > >Or, maybe by that time someone will come up with some sourdough rye > >that is tested for gluten and guaranteed gluten free or something. > They already have some in the works. Actually I think > rye is a LOT less problematic than wheat, esp. > if it's soured. But they have a special bacteria that > seems to break down the peptide in question and > produce a bread that doesn't act allergenic even in > vitro. Right. So I'm thinking maybe by the time I can start eating starches again, they'll have this bread out. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2005 Report Share Posted August 24, 2005 >I thought with the enterlabs testing you could test while not on gluten? They can, but the IgA levels still go down gradually. And for folks like me (who had a very love-hate relationship with wheat for 20 years) I don't think the results are all that accurate, since they are comparing them to " average " Americans who eat like 200 lbs of the stuff a year. >Well I'm not using either right now, and the beer seems to give me a >bloat and some tummy rumbling, unlike wine. I'm not sure how to >measure " good health. " I don't get the sense that my intestines are >in good health, although I seem to be doing well with my egg-free >dairy-free nut-free SCD with loads of HCl and enzymes. But my lower >abdomen is still distended when relaxed, which indicates a health >problem to me. I think it takes a long time for digestion to return to optimal. I'm not sure mine is optimal yet ... it's a lot better and rumbling is a thing of the past (the family used to tease me about all the noise my gut made). >By the way... a week or two before my fast I found what appeared to be >some blood in my stools. I don't remember whether I mentioned that on >list or not. But that's pretty bad, isn't it? So again, I'm not sure >I would say I'm " healthy. " If it's overt blood then it's from the lower intestine ... I get that when I have a gluten " accident " (which in my case usually means eating out: I don't eat any on purpose, ever) and seems to be from extreme irritation to the gut or " rectal fissures " or hemorhoids. It doesn't always mean something VERY bad is going on though. >Right. I hate this idea of " aging. " At a family get-together last >night my uncle's " aging-induced " gut was discussed. Grr. Grr indeed. Some doctors talk about " age induced blunting of the villi " . I mean really! Those villi regenerate in *days* or maybe weeks if you are older, but it's not like they wear out over the years. >No teeth. Well, that's middle age for you. Oh that's sad. >Right. So I'm thinking maybe by the time I can start eating starches >again, they'll have this bread out. Yep. There's some pretty good GF bread out there already though. I pigged out on it for awhile, out of a sense of being deprived, I guess, then remembered I just don't like bread much. >-- Heidi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 >> Coffee has 9 grams of carbs per cup << where did you get this? Coffee - black coffee - has only trace carbs, less than one per cup. http://www.carb-counter.org/beverages/search/Coffee/1400 Christie Caber Feidh ish Deerhounds Holistically Raising Our Dogs Since 1986 http://www.caberfeidh.com/ http://www.doggedblog.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 On 8/25/05, Christie <christiekeith@...> wrote: > >> Coffee has > 9 grams of carbs per cup << > > where did you get this? Coffee - black coffee - has only trace carbs, > less than one per cup. I got it from Barry Sears, a long time ago, but I see the USDA agrees and coffee is carb-free. I stand corrected. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Chris- >When I was 17 I asked the >opthamologist what would've happened in my body that I suddenly needed >glasses, and he said, " Well, you're just getting older. " This " getting older " business has got to be one of the most pernicious memes out there. All sorts of absurd health problems are blamed on age. I know a guy who works out rigorously and keeps himself in the best shape possible (he used to even a own a gym) but believes in mainstream nutrition, and when he turned 40 he said he couldn't believe how miserable aging was. As if a fit 40yo guy should be dragging himself around and having all sorts of health problems! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 >-----Original Message----- >From: >[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Masterjohn > > >On 8/24/05, Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > >> For the first three days everything I ate/drank gave me gut >pain, even the >> clear veggie broth! I couldn't even think about eating solid foods, hence >> bone broth, sheep kefir and yogurt. I'm battling candida, so I'm >*loading* >> up with probiotics, which is one reason I decided to do the kefir and >> yogurt >> (which contains 7 probiotic strains). I also have 5 gallons of >EM that I'll >> be bottling in a few days, AND commercial probiotics on top of that AND I >> ordered probiotic enema implants. And I just made a 2 qt. jar of >kimchi. Do >> you suppose I have my bases covered? <g> > >I see your strategy, but I suspect the dairy is counterproductive even >if fermented. For example, I don't think I ever got any probiotic >benefit from kefired milk, which I think really helped me in terms of >sleep and teeth, but really damaged my gut (paradoxically, since that >supports a reductionist approach to health that is against my >inclinations.) On the other hand, it seemed like kefired young >coconut water was very helpful to my gut. I wonder if you should try >a non-dairy kefir? First, I have already taken into consideration most of what you wrote about dairy, but wanted to try fermented sheeps milk products nonetheless to see where I'm at with it. As far as other kefired products, the only thing available to me are fruit juices, but that's a load of unneccessary sugar in the form of lactic acid with very little other benefit except the probiotics which I'm getting from other sources. I'm actually just going to eat my kefir beer grains and call it a day on kefir for a while. > >> I think I have a problem with eggs so they are off the menu for now. I'm >> not >> sure if I'm going to stick with the kefir/yogurt or not. > >Well if you got the big woozy feeling from it, I don't see how you >could conclude that you might not have problems with it. I would >consider " woozy " a problem. I didn't conclude that. > >> The more I read >> about the A1/A2 issue though, the more I'm inclined to think the >Enterolab >> test is for A1 casein. Not that it doesn't mean one can't also develop an >> allergy to A2, but that's a big question mark in my mind. > >I think it would be pretty easy if you have a damaged gut. For >example, people with leaky guts develop allergies to almost everything >they eat. When I was a baby, I couldn't even tolerate fruits and >vegetables! Right, but I assume those are IgE and IgGs? These are the type that result from leaky gut since these reactions take place in the bloodstream. My main concern is IgAs which take place in the gut itself. I don't know if leaky gut affects IgA allergies or not, but it doesn't have the direct link that it does to IgEs and IgGs, AFAIK, in that it doesn't require the gut to leak in order for an IgA allergy to develop, I don't think. Again, I think all my allergies started with candida, which has a protein *like* gliadin and I think I began to cross-react to gliadin which was mistaken for candida, which would be something the immuen system *should* react to. Then came casein, etc. At least that's my current thinking. > >> I had some goat >> chevre today as well, but had absolutely no perceptible >reaction. During my >> fast I thought about cheese alot for some reason, even though I've never >> been a big cheese person. > >Interesting. Did you need enzymes for it? I don't know. I just take them with any dairy. According to Dr. Shaw, theoretically if one takes enough DPP IV enzymes they shouldn't have any problem with casein or gluten. > >> >My thought is that milk should be banished entirely until the healing >> >process is nearing completion, which probably takes a long time. >> >Introducing other types of milk with a damaged gut could result in an >> >allergy that we might not necessarily have inherently. > >> I thought of that. I guess it's a little late for that though, because I >> was consuming these things for a while when my gut was already damaged. > >I don't know enough about allergy development to know whether or not >that's good reasoning. Isn't it possible that the allergy would take >on more permanent characteristics or worsen in magnitude, the greater >the magnitude and duration of the allergen exposure? Quite possibly. > >> But I do always take my DPP IV with them. I believe candida is >at the root of my > gut problems. And so my focus is mainly on >getting rid of it, which is I'm >> loading up on probiotics of all stripes. And why I can't eat all that >> honey that you are using as a comfort food. There IS some maple >syrup in the >> yogurt I get, but not much. I stopped drinking decaf coffee months ago, >> although I love it too. I just didn't like it with canned coconut milk in >> it. I'm going to make my own coconut cream tomorrow from a >coconut, and if >> it's good, I might try it in decaf for a treat. > >Are you sure that lactic acid is that toxic to candida? No, I didn't mention anything about lactic acid, it's the bacteria themselves that help rid the gut of candida. I think I >have fungal issues too, but candida diets are supposed to be >dairy-free for whatever reason, and free of some particular fermented >foods, especially yeast-fermented. Depends on whom you listen to. I think dairy is generally forbidden due to the carb content. But I don't think they were thinking of sheeps milk which has *double* the fat of even Jersey milk, LOL I went on an anti-candida diet for >a month once that drove me insane and did nothing to clear up my >symptoms. In any case, kefir is loaded with carbs, since lactic acid >is for any practical purpose a carb. I'm wondering whether the lactic >acid is metabolically active for the candida, and just how toxic it >is. I'm also wondering if asymptomatic gut damage could outweigh the >probiotic benefit. Possibly. But again, Sheep kefir with an 8-9% fat content isn't really " loaded " with carbs, I'd think, although I haven't done any calculations. I'm not doing a no-carb diet, but rather moderate carbs. My focus is on super-loading probiotics, although I'm starting on oregano oil soon too, which I find to be very effective. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 On 8/25/05, Suze Fisher <s.fisher22@...> wrote: > Right, but I assume those are IgE and IgGs? That's my (weak) understanding. > These are the type that result > from leaky gut since these reactions take place in the bloodstream. My main > concern is IgAs which take place in the gut itself. I don't know if leaky > gut affects IgA allergies or not, but it doesn't have the direct link that > it does to IgEs and IgGs, AFAIK, in that it doesn't require the gut to leak > in order for an IgA allergy to develop, I don't think. Again, I think all > my allergies started with candida, which has a protein *like* gliadin and I > think I began to cross-react to gliadin which was mistaken for candida, > which would be something the immuen system *should* react to. Then came > casein, etc. At least that's my current thinking. Right, but any allergies are bad. I'm suggesting it is best to play it on the safe side and avoid any common allergens during the healing phase, so that the development of those other allergies doesn't 1)hinder the healing process and 2) lengthen your inability to eat them beyond the gut-healing stage. > >Are you sure that lactic acid is that toxic to candida? > > No, I didn't mention anything about lactic acid, it's the bacteria > themselves that help rid the gut of candida. Right... but if the lactic acid isn't toxic to the candida, or isn't very toxic to the candida, it could be *feeding* the candida as much as any monosacharide. You had said you were using dairy because you couldn't afford the amount of honey I was using in my comfort foods (which is actually pretty small), but what I'm getting at is that do we actually know that honey, both a source of sugar and antibiotic compounds, is more likely to fuel the growth of candida than kefir? (By the way, I'm wondering but am not sure if chocolate might have anti-fungal properties like coffee apparently does.) > I think I > >have fungal issues too, but candida diets are supposed to be > >dairy-free for whatever reason, and free of some particular fermented > >foods, especially yeast-fermented. > > Depends on whom you listen to. I think dairy is generally forbidden due to > the carb content. But I don't think they were thinking of sheeps milk which > has *double* the fat of even Jersey milk, LOL I went on an anti-candida diet of Russ Newman (ND, I think) who was adamantly against using even butter. Unfortunately, he was not the type to fully explain himself, and more the type to just tell you what to do. But he insisted that using butter would lessen the effectiveness of the program. So, while they might be wrong, it is dairy itself, and not the carbs in dairy, that at least some anti-candida diets oppose. And if it were the carbs, they would all allow raw cheese, which doesn't have carbs. > Possibly. But again, Sheep kefir with an 8-9% fat content isn't really > " loaded " with carbs, I'd think, although I haven't done any calculations. > I'm not doing a no-carb diet, but rather moderate carbs. My focus is on > super-loading probiotics, although I'm starting on oregano oil soon too, > which I find to be very effective. I'm not sure if you can assume the fat content of the kefir based on the fat content of the fresh milk, but the fat content says nothing about the carb content whatsoever. Fat content could be higher entirely or partly from increased solid to water ratio. Besides, the point I was getting at was whether or not it was comparable to honey. And I'm quite positive that, if lactic acid is effectively a carb as far as candida is concerned (I don't know if this assumption is true), then sheep milk kefir is not any less carby than my chocolate snacks, where the calories overwhelmingly come from ghee, or in the other case, ghee and coconut fat. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.