Guest guest Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 --- In , " rda " <juliarda@h...> wrote: > > >I suspect that in rural India the dietary > >situation is a lot like it was in rural Europe: if you have > >to grow your own food, it's likely high in vegies (and > >eggs, poultry, dairy, depending on the religion etc). > >But in the cities there is a lot more bread and rice, > >plus all those nice imported foods and lots of really, > >really sweet tea! Not to mention soft drinks ... > > > > The only time I've been in truly rural India, the diet was rice, vegetables > and eggs, and they would kill a chicken for a special occasion. They > served us one meal of chicken while we were there, which was very kind of > them, but their chickens were so scrawny that there wasn't much flesh on it. > I don't recall eating bread while we were there, but we were only there > for four days. > > : That the chickens were scrawny is understandable, given that they aren't fattened up, but was the flesh, scarce as it was, tastier? Flesh from free-range chickens usually tastes a lot better, though it may be tougher. Unless the cook was really bad. José Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.