Guest guest Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 REGARDING: " In other words, is the ACOEM Mold Statement consistent with the IOM Report? " RESPONSE: Does it have to? Since one is a scientific review and the other a POLICY paper? Tony ....................................................................... " Tony " Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE pH2, LLC 5250 E US 36, Suite 830 Avon, IN 46123 off fax cell 90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any consultant can give you the other 10%(SM) This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at . Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 What gives the biased and troubled ACOEM a right to determine policy for anyone? How did we end up with the current administration's CDC advising patients who ask them where to go to contact the ACOEM for 'help'? If you can't trust the government on things like this, who can you trust? If you ask me, the ACOEM is functioning as an arm of Bush adminstration policy, NOT science OR medicine, in this situation. And that is a serious problem. Medicine should not be run by politicians and their donors and their servants. > REGARDING: > > " In other words, is the ACOEM Mold Statement consistent with the IOM > Report? " > > RESPONSE: > > Does it have to? Since one is a scientific review and the other a POLICY > paper? > > Tony > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2007 Report Share Posted December 18, 2007 What gives the biased and troubled ACOEM a right to determine policy for anyone? How did we end up with the current administration's CDC advising patients who ask them where to go to contact the ACOEM for 'help'? If you can't trust the government on things like this, who can you trust? If you ask me, the ACOEM is functioning as an arm of Bush adminstration policy, NOT science OR medicine, in this situation. And that is a serious problem. Medicine should not be run by politicians and their donors and their servants. > REGARDING: > > " In other words, is the ACOEM Mold Statement consistent with the IOM > Report? " > > RESPONSE: > > Does it have to? Since one is a scientific review and the other a POLICY > paper? > > Tony > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.