Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 I've been gone a bit lately because I've been feeling so darned healthy. This health seems to be really fine and stayinf around and I finally feel that, 2 years after the fact, this illness will be one of my life's " stories " . yay. So now I'm trying to catch up on life outside the walls of my house. That means getting out more often into the VERY vegetarian/vegan activist community of Sonoma/Marin Counties in Northern California. Apparently we have one of the largest vegetarian activist (terrorist, even) communities in the country and since I've been doing yoga daily, the vast majority of people I'm seeing are either vegan or vegetarian (and are also quite vocal about it..) As I may have mentioned before, I'm not a reformer. I really don't care what anybody does so long as it doesn't interfere with the lives of others. I'm a real big fan of common courtesy. I detest making laws for every little thing. I think this reformer role may be changing, however, because ever since this celiac thing, I seem to be getting royally pissed off by people basically telling me I'm a jerk (in so many words,) for eating meat. So I guess I do have an enemy now and that is anyone who trys to tell me what to eat; And they're doing it all the time! I don't mind that people are vegan and they shouldn't mind that I'm an omnivore. We should all just eat in peace. Ah. But as it turns out it DOES matter because they are speaking for the innocents -- God's creatures who have no voice of their own.. To that end, I just wrote a letter to the editor of the Chronicle newspaper here about the vegan activist groups and thought I'd share it with you -- possibly the only friends I have left in the world :-) The paper contained a rather pro-vegan activist article. Note: I need to point out that the worst thing you can do to a San Francisco area cutting edge liberal group like the vegans is to compare them to a conservative group. Here's my letter: " Dear Editor: I realize that vegan/vegetarian activists probably feel they're the voice of innocent animals when they proselytize and protest the eating of meat, but how are these groups different from the right-to-lifers who feel that they're the voice of unborn babies? It's all about choice isn't it? Will someone please explain why, in the Bay Area,it's fashionable to be a Vegan but a social deathwish to be a Moral Majority type? ~Robin Reese " FYI, here's the article: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi? file=/c/a/2005/08/05/PNGILDVEHB1.DTL & type=printable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.