Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 > Re: prevalence of gluten intolerance (was: opioids, sugar, >etc.) > > > >>Heidi, >> >>Where are you getting the " 10% " figure from? The 30% is from Dr. Fine's >>stool test, right? >> >>Suze Fisher > >10% is from Dangerous Grains and most of the writups ... it's the number >of random Americans that test high for IgA in blood tests (rather than >stool tests). Ah, I thought so. From my understanding then, the 10% figure is probably quite inaccurate since the blood test is not nearly as sensitive as the stool test. If the stool test is indeed much more sensitive and accurate than the blood test, then the stool test figures at 29% prevalence would be the current accurate figure, it seems. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 >Ah, I thought so. From my understanding then, the 10% figure is probably >quite inaccurate since the blood test is not nearly as sensitive as the >stool test. If the stool test is indeed much more sensitive and accurate >than the blood test, then the stool test figures at 29% prevalence would be >the current accurate figure, it seems. > >Suze Fisher I agree. I'm not sure most people are quite willing to hear that though! Folks are still getting used to the idea that " as many as 1 out of 100 " people react negatively to wheat. When the 1 in 230 figure came out a few years ago, scientists in the US were shocked, because it had been thought to be so very very rare ... Heidi Jean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.