Guest guest Posted August 14, 2005 Report Share Posted August 14, 2005 Actually I'm not surprised by it. If you saw Super Size Me you'd remember the guy who has eaten nothing but Big Macs, usually 2 a day, for years, but he rarely has the fries or a soda. And he was thin and healthy. I think it's more the soda and trans-fat fries that are making people fat than the burgers. Deanna Wagner <hl@...> wrote: I wonder what her compensation was for this stunt? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8916080/ " , from Raleigh, thought the documentary [supersize Me] had unfairly targeted the world's largest restaurant company, implying that the obese were victims of a careless corporate giant. People are responsible for what they eat, she said, not restaurants. The problem with a Mc's-only diet isn't what's on the menu, but the choices made from it, she said. " Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2005 Report Share Posted August 14, 2005 Deanna, > I wonder what her compensation was for this stunt? > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8916080/ Good question. This isn't an original idea—some Dutch reporter went on the " Mc's Diet " last year and lost weight. http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?channel_id=1 & story_id=10584 This made the rounds on another nutrition list. They were skeptical about this story, because they thought that the European Mc's foods probably have better quality than ours. I seriously doubt it! I know the Japanese ones aren't that different, although they do offer items that aren't available here (mainly fish). Naomi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2005 Report Share Posted August 14, 2005 >Actually I'm not surprised by it. If you saw Super Size Me you'd remember the guy who has eaten nothing but Big Macs, usually 2 a day, for years, but he rarely has the fries or a soda. And he was thin and healthy. I think it's more the soda and trans-fat fries that are making people fat than the burgers. > > However, she also just plain counted calories: ================== http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8916080/ 1,400 calories a day used nutritional information downloaded from Mc’s Web site to create meal plans of no more than 1,400 calories a day. She only ate french fries twice, usually choosing burgers and salads. Those choices are a stark contrast with those made by Spurlock, who ate every menu item at least once. At the end of the 90 days, she had dropped from 227 to 190 pounds. ================= .. McD salads are basically just salads (though nowhere near as good as the nice organice ones we make at home) and the burgers you DO know how many calories are in them. Lower-calorie diets DO work to lose weight, if the person can stick to them. For many people that means constant hunger, which again, most people can't live with long term. The argument, for me, against McD style food is that somehow it is very EASY to eat way more than your body can possibly use. That doesn't mean you CAN'T refuse to eat so much, if you choose to do so. Actually when I was on " diets " in the working world I did eat a lot of fast-food salads. Some foods though, it's very very difficult to eat so much that you gain weight: probably the traditional French meals fall into that category, because even though they are rich, they fill you up quickly. Some foods are like that, and it's not JUST about macronutrients. Soups, apples, eggs, steak ... they all fill you up! And some foods " stick with you " longer than others too. The arguments about Supersize Me, on both sides, miss that point: food should work WITH your appestat, not against it. Heidi Jean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2005 Report Share Posted August 14, 2005 > The arguments about Supersize Me, on both sides, miss that point: food > should work WITH your appestat, not against it. Plus also Spurlock set himself some conditions that were not exactly free choice: He had to try everything on the menu at least once, and if the clerk asked him if he wanted it supersized he had to say " yes. " And everything he ate, including water, had to come from there. Lynn S. ------ Lynn Siprelle * web developer, writer, mama, fiber junky http://www.siprelle.com * http://www.thenewhomemaker.com http://www.deanspeaksforme.com * http://www.knitting911.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2005 Report Share Posted August 16, 2005 Heidi- >Lower-calorie diets DO work to lose weight, if the person can stick to them. Not indefinitely. The body will adjust its metabolism to compensate, and the more times the metabolism gets mucked with, the more problems you're going to have down the line. Calorie restriction is a dreadful idea. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.