Guest guest Posted December 27, 2006 Report Share Posted December 27, 2006 Wei and Group: As I lay in the hospital bed this past week under heavy morpheme sedation, I had a dream about work. The story goes: I was being asked as an expert in a worker’s compensation case to support the hypothesis that generations of mold growth in constantly wet drywall walls are capable of producing virulent T-2 mold compounds and antigens including cytotoxin, trichothecene and other mycotoxigenicity agents. These agents can be inhaled, ingested and absorbed into the system of mold remediation employees even though they are wearing an N-95 facemask. Meaning, a paper-base facemask as compared to a HEPA/Organic filtered cartridge mask, the N-95 mask “does not” adequately protect workers during mold remediation. I do not remember what my response was but I do remember the question. Can you and others in the group fill in the answer for me? Moffett Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.