Guest guest Posted August 2, 2005 Report Share Posted August 2, 2005 >If indeed the >numbers are much higher than previously thought then it basically shoots >down the notion of selective adaptation to gluten due to the length of time >it's been consumed in various regions. Suze: Not necessarily shoots it down. The " adaptation " theory is based on how prevalent the genes are, and AFAIK they are still rarer in the Middle East than in the northern countries. Some populations they never did TEST for the celiac genes though, so it will be interesting to see what the true genetic prevalence is in random testing. Genetic distribution isn't simple either: they keep saying " celiac is rare in Africa " but in fact some of the worst " outbreaks " have been in African populations that are suddenly getting wheat (or higher gluten wheat). Even in a country that DOES eat wheat, there are pockets of inbred people who get NO wheat. But 95% of the people with celiac have the genes and the relationship is very clear between the genes and the disease. And yeah, I agree with your earlier post, the " blood reactions " are basically IgG. The relation to IgE allergies isn't so straightforward ... IgE allergies to wheat are rather rare it seems, though IgG is common. It was interesting that while I was travelling I got some gluten, and for the next few days I started getting IgE allergy symptoms to dust etc, which is something I don't normally get. I'm convinced there is a connection there, like maybe the body is just on " high alert " once it's detected one allergen or something? Heidi Jean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.