Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 >> I noticed in the food diaries on the WAP website, most women seemed to be eating around 3000 calories per day. I'm trying to lose weight, not gain it. What has your experience been? << I didn't gain or lose when I began eating " NT " style, but once I combined it with low-carb principles, I lost 127 pounds in the last two years. Others have had the same thing happen when they added some additional restriction to their eating plan, such as the Warrior Diet (eating one large meal in the PM and very lightly during the day), or gluten free, or whatever their individual circumstances called for. What this says to me is that NT is compatible with losing OR gaining OR maintaining weight, but in and of itself it won't do any of those things - you still have to look at personal lifestyle, individual body chemistry, preferences, etc. and address the macronutrient levels and portion sizes of your overall food intake, as well, of course, activity levels. As to calories, and fat intake, I get around 75-80 percent of my calories from fat, and as long as I keep my calories in the range of 10-12 times my body weight, I lose weight easily. The first 8 months the weight just dropped off, but since then it's been more along the lines of 3-5 pounds a month. Slow but steady. But throughout this period I've eaten a very high fat (albeit low carb), NT-style diet. All fresh, whole foods, no low carb crap junk food. I will say I don't care for any fermented foods except now and then I get into the mood for kimchi, and while I eat raw dairy products I can't STAND even the idea of raw meats or eggs, so I eat those cooked. So I'm not an extreme NT person. FWIW. Hope this was somewhat helpful. Christie Caber Feidh ish Deerhounds Holistically Raising Our Dogs Since 1986 http://www.caberfeidh.com http://doggedblog.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Weight Loss and NT? From what I've read so far, eating this way would increase my daily caloric intake. I noticed in the food diaries on the WAP website, most women seemed to be eating around 3000 calories per day. I'm trying to lose weight, not gain it. What has your experience been? Let's see -- 10 lb. weight loss (didn't even try), no more environmental allergies or asthma (had for 10 years), decreased depression, softer skin, thicker hair; need I say more? Rebekah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 On Wed, 18 May 2005 19:45:19 -0000 " Penciloid " <Penciloid@...> wrote: > From what I've read so far, eating this way would increase my daily > caloric intake. I noticed in the food diaries on the WAP website, most > women seemed to be eating around 3000 calories per day. I'm trying to > lose weight, not gain it. What has your experience been? I think in most instances, especially if you include lots of dairy and/or grain products in your diet, you will probably have to combine WAP style eating, especially as it appears in _Nourishing Traditions_, with some kind of weight loss program if that is an issue for you. Now my experience has been that a lot of people who go straight from SAD to NT/WAP do lose weight initially, without even trying, but that it doesn't last and is probably the result of some detoxifying effect in that all of a sudden the body is not burdened with having to deal with a lot of junk like white sugar, white flour, additives, unnatural hormones, etc. Dufty, the author of the fantastic book, Sugar Blues, comments that once he gave up sugar he discovered that he had a chin, LOL!. (By the way, if you have never read _Sugar Blues_, I would do so immediately. Regardless of how bad you *think* white sugar is, this books brings it home in a way I haven't seen anywhere else). There is also the idea that if you concentrate on getting healthy, then the weight will eventually take care of itself. I think that is true to a large extent and explains why people who have obvious problems, like gluten intolerance, or casein intolerance, or digestive issues or whathaveyou, lose a lot of weight when these issues are addressed. But it can be slow going and most people want to see results on a fairly quick basis. Nonetheless, there are a category of folks, while taking into account their own issues and individual body chemistries, who will need to focus on weightloss per se, which is okay, in my opinion, if it is done within the framework of a healthy diet. The two dominant approaches on the list, at least among the active posters, is lowcarbing and the Warrior Diet, both combined with movement/activity/exercise. I have done them both. They can be fitted beautifully with WAP principles. I prefer the WD as it gives me the benefits of intermittent fasting on a daily basis (without being hungry), at least according to the studies, and allows for more in terms of carbs but that is my personal preference. If I ever did go back to low carb, it would be on something like the Anabolic Diet (or Metabolic Diet, which is an updated and " broader " version of the Anabolic Diet), which is a cyclical low carb program, more popular among athletes than it is with the general public. Either way, if losing weight (or inches - which is just as good if not better unless you have a lot of weight to lose) is your goal, either approach should work fine, keeping in mind you may need to address some other issues as well. Hope that helps, " This is what is meant by " sacrifice " , literally, the " making sacred " of an animal consumed for dinner. Yet sacrifice, because it dwells on the death, is a concept often shocking to the secular modern Western mind - to people who calmly organize daily hecatombs of beasts, and who are among the most death-dealing carnivores the world has ever seen. " Margaret Visser: The Rituals of Dinner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 >> I think in most instances, especially if you include lots of dairy and/or grain products in your diet, you will probably have to combine WAP style eating, especially as it appears in _Nourishing Traditions_, with some kind of weight loss program if that is an issue for you. << , this was a really excellent overview of NT and weight loss ... excellent post! Christie Caber Feidh ish Deerhounds Holistically Raising Our Dogs Since 1986 http://www.caberfeidh.com http://doggedblog.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 On Wed, 18 May 2005 13:07:43 -0700 " Christie " <christiekeith@...> wrote: > As to calories, and fat intake, I get around 75-80 percent of my calories > from fat, and as long as I keep my calories in the range of 10-12 times my > body weight, I lose weight easily. Come on, don't you think that is a little extreme? I mean, you have to be careful with these *high protein* low carb diets, as they can be very harmful ;-) > I will say I don't care for any fermented foods except now and then I get > into the mood for kimchi, What???!!!! No cheese, kefir, wine, beer, long fermented breads, aged steaks, lox, sausage....goodness, how do you live?? LOL! > and while I eat raw dairy products I can't STAND > even the idea of raw meats or eggs, so I eat those cooked. So I'm not an > extreme NT person. FWIW. Well I guess such an evaluation is in the eye of the beholder as most folks would think a diet which derives 75-80% of its calories from fat as *very* extreme...hehehe. The way someone got me hooked on raw/very rare meat is that they told me to be quiet and close my eyes, they had something they wanted me to try. Being the adventurous chap I am I followed orders. They put a piece of very rare steak in my mouth and I couldn't believe how GOOD it was. Of course I didn't know it was very rare until after I ate it, LOL! The experience ranks up there with the very first time I had a truly superior glass of wine. I couldn't believe how long I had been slumming with the cheap stuff. I'm with you on the eggs though, unless they are in a nice milk/kefir shake. " This is what is meant by " sacrifice " , literally, the " making sacred " of an animal consumed for dinner. Yet sacrifice, because it dwells on the death, is a concept often shocking to the secular modern Western mind - to people who calmly organize daily hecatombs of beasts, and who are among the most death-dealing carnivores the world has ever seen. " Margaret Visser: The Rituals of Dinner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 > What???!!!! No cheese, kefir, wine, beer, long fermented breads, aged > steaks, lox, sausage....goodness, how do you live?? LOL! LOL, ok, yeah, you're right.... of course I eat cheese, I don't drink or eat bread so that doesn't count, but SAUSAGE... oh yeah. And aged steaks. So OK, I don't like fermented milk (no, I hate kefir and yogurt), or veggies except now and then some kimchi. <G> > They put a piece of very rare steak in my mouth and I couldn't believe > how GOOD it was. It is true that I now eat my meat much closer to rare. I used to basically burn it, LOL, but now I do what might be called medium rare... pink in the middle. I'm getting there. Maybe. Christie Caber Feidh ish Deerhounds Holistically Raising Our Dogs Since 1986 http://www.caberfeidh.com http://doggedblog.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 >>From what I've read so far, eating this way would increase my daily >caloric intake. I noticed in the food diaries on the WAP website, most >women seemed to be eating around 3000 calories per day. I'm trying to >lose weight, not gain it. What has your experience been? My experience was that once my body was healing, I totally didn't need (or want) as many calories. Whereas I used to eat more fat, I didn't digest it well. And I used to eat a lot more starches. These days I crave vegies and fruits and good meat, but my caloric intake is probably about 1800 calories or less. My metabolism is higher though than it used to be: my basal temp is higher and I rarely get cold anymore (I used to be one of those folks who had to bundle up all the time!). I don't eat gluten grains or dairy, and if you have to avoid those two your calorie count will generally be lower by default! Interestingly though, I lost a lot of inches around my middle before I lost any weight. The weight loss really started when I started the Warrior Diet, which is also a MUCH easier way to eat when you are cooking from scratch! I.e. during the day I just don't cook ... I eat raw stuff, or nothing at all. Heidi Jean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Penciloid wrote: > >From what I've read so far, eating this way would increase my daily > caloric intake. I noticed in the food diaries on the WAP website, most > women seemed to be eating around 3000 calories per day. I'm trying to > lose weight, not gain it. What has your experience been? > > I have gained weight since going NT. However, other factors are involved as in the loss of a dog, my companion on long walks I no longer take, and a history of thyroid problems in my family, although my thyroid tests normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.