Guest guest Posted May 29, 2005 Report Share Posted May 29, 2005 [] so cows, when they eat grass, are eating the WHOLE grass, seed, or grain, and all. [MikeP] Actually, like most animals, cows are selective about what stage of growth and components of grass they eat. Given a choice, I understand they'll always favor the young grass tips, but in practice a bit of older grass and seeds will be part of their diet. Note that various primates often preferentially eat only the *tips* of leaves and not whole leaves, because of the difference in nutritional profile. It's really not possible to make meaningful generalizations about whole foods, because " the whole " is a relative notion in the first place and humans and other animals adapt to the unique properties of different parts of organic matter on a case-by-case basis. When we speak of " whole grains " , we could just as well speak of the whole plant with flowers, stalks, etc, and it is normal for just one part of a plant to be edible, while nearby parts are poisonous. Consider the 6 basic categories of human foods: animals, veggies, fruits, seeds, eggs, milk. In the animal case, the " whole food " could be considered the entire animal, which is rarely eaten in its entirety and for larger animals, never in the same meal. Eating whole small rodents and insects is a traditional human practice, but eating large herbivorous animals is probably an even more widespread tradition for humans and in those cases we certainly don't eat the skin and rarely the whole bones. Also consider the medicinal potency of various glands and organs and resulting need to divide the animal up in various ways. In the veggie case, well you've got the basic point about plants I made above. Examples would be potato, tomato, and parnsip leaves (all poisonous), poisonous flowers, and various inedibly fibrous parts of plants. In the case of fruits, well, this could be assimilated to generalizations about the diversity of plant components, because fruits are just a tiny part of the plants that bear them. But even within a fruit, often the seeds or outer layers are not eaten. In the case of seeds, we have the option of considering various inedible pods and shells as part of the whole (coconut being an especially dramatic example), but even if we narrow it down to a minimal seed concept, we still find cases where it's equally valid to remove certain outer layers, although it is possible to make a mild generalization that whole seeds are more nutritious and the best option if they're to be consumed in the first place. In the case of eggs, there are the issues with whites and shells. Lastly, milk is the only food substance that actually exists for the express purpose of being food (unless we make a case for fruits), so unsurprisingly this is consumed as a whole food, although eating only parts of it (the cream, the fat, or the curds) are, besides being very common, at least as valid as eating the whole food from a health or nutrition standpoint for lactovorous weaned mammals like many humans. So overall, it's clear that there's little in the way of generalizations we can make about a concept of wholeness for foods. Of course when we speak of " whole foods " in a casual context of modern foodways, we are referring to a fairly clear contrast between traditionally processed foods and industrially processed foods, but this distinction relies on a somewhat arbitrary technological context so we shouldn't expect to find much in the way of the sorts of profound insights into nature you're seeking with this concept. [] we're not supposed to feed cows just the grain part. [MikeP] Well, even in the basest factory farms there is no such thing as a 100% grain cow diet as far as I'm aware—at least some form of grass is always in there. Past a certain percentage of grains, cows just die, which is bad for business. But if that was a typo and you meant something like " leaf " instead of " grain " , the idea doesn't hold, because the small amount of grains (especially when taken calorically and considering differences in grass breeds) that could be identified as part of a natural cow diet is certainly not essential and amounts to little more than dietary noise within the range of tolerance for cows. Mike SE Pennsylvania The best way to predict the future is to invent it. --Alan Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.