Guest guest Posted August 5, 2005 Report Share Posted August 5, 2005 > Well, the body does have a limited ability to convert pyridoxine to P5P (or > PLP, as it's more properly called) so that would probably explain it. I > don't think pyridoxine is used for anything itself, though, and the body > doesn't convert anything back to PN either, whereas PM and PL exist in > equilibrium and can be converted in either direction as necessary. > > - , Okay, so where are you getting all your juicey B6 information? I found this statement on the internet " Pyridoxal phosphate is not taken orally unless enterically coated because it is destroyed by the digestion process " . If that's true that may explain why the doctor found that PLP doesn't work for some people - maybe they were taking non-coated PLP or non-sublingual? And, " Two enzymatic steps are required for the conversion of inactive Vit B6 (pyridoxine) to active pyridoxal-5-phosphate (P5P or PLP). The first is phosphorylation of pyridoxine by pyridoxine kinase, which itself requires magnesium and P5P. The second is oxidation of pyridoxine phosphate, which requires riboflavin (Vit B2) " which probably isn't exactly right, but that would explain why some people are getting good results with pyridoxine in combo with just a little PLP and the recommended Mg supplement this doctor also requires. Anyway, my question... do you see anything really, really bad about taking pyridoxine. I've got a couple of bottles of the Thorne B6 formulation that has both forms and the cheapskate in me wants to finish the bottles since they are working really well for me before I look into finding a better source? Just being nosey, are you some type of scientist/engineer or do you have a chemistry/science related degree? Katy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.