mostly off-topic (was Re: Setting the record straight...)

[Guest guest]

>Maybe we are simply " fighting " over words. But when you say you are

the

> anti-Christ, doesn't that imply that you acknowledge the existence of

> (a) Christ? Otherwise you wouldn't be able to call yourself " anti " .

If

> you exist as an anti-Christ, it is because there is a Christ or at

> least a clear and undeniable concept of Him. Just an aside.

>

> JC

>

> PS. By the way, what is the meaning of " blurp " ? I presume it is not

> good manners. It doesn't sound euphonic, at least. Gene, aren't you a

> musician? Aren't you hurting Euterpe by using such terms?

, are you sure you are agnostic? You seem so " Christ like " in this

post. I really enjoy your post and I agree with friend A. You don't

know what you are missing. Take care, Roni