Guest guest Posted June 27, 2005 Report Share Posted June 27, 2005 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:53:05 -0000 " alangaud " <alangaud@...> wrote: > I need a good reference for that. I've always read that > ANYONE can become physically addicted to alcohol. How quickly and > 'easily' that'll happen can vary tremendously from person to person. Suggest you read: Heavy Drinking: The Myth of Alcoholism as a Disease http://snipurl.com/fv9w A review: After reading Fingarette's essay " Alcoholism and Self-Deception " in _Self-Deception and Self-Understanding_, I was eager for more of his unique and interesting perspective on problem drinking. In this short and very readable book, Fingarette steadily and easily demolishes the prevailing opinion that alcoholism is a disease in which the alcoholic loses control over his drinking. (The scientific community long ago abandoned this view, but it lives on as dogma through the recovery movement.) Fingarette instead explains problem drinking as the result of choices that elevate drinking into a " central activity " in the drinker's life. He argues that the motivations for the choices that make drinking a core value are as many and varied as are the individuals making them. My only serious objection to the book comes in the final chapter on social policy; Fingarette would seem to be happy to turn this country into a totalitarian state to prevent some people from making stupid choices about alcohol. Despite that flaw, _Heavy Drinking_ presents an impressive and well-reasoned case against the disease model of problem drinking. http://www.dianahsieh.com/reviews/hd.html A few months back Lynn Siprelle and I had a brief exchange about the subject: On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:40:45 -0800 Lynn Siprelle <lynn@...> wrote: > > the author notes that what we would today define as " heavy drinking " > > was > > quite common among the colonials, even among the so called Puritans, > > and > > yet none were what we would call today an " alcoholic. " > > Perhaps the difference was that these old-time daily drinks were all > natural ferments instead of cultivated yeast ferments? That I don't know. But I do know that people having been getting intoxicated since time immemorial, so whatever they drank it was up to the task. I have no doubt > in my mind that alcoholism exists; I've seen too many people's lives > ruined, nearly including my own and my husband's. I've known several people whose lives have been ruined when alcohol became its central core. The author disputes such behavior though as being a disease, not that people engage in it. At any rate, this question won't be resolved on this list of any other list any time soon. Particularly given the extremely controversial nature of the book as noted in the brief blurb below: " Heavy Drinking informs the general public for the first time how recent research has discredited almost every widely held belief about alcoholism, including the very concept of alcoholism as a single disease with a unique cause. Herbert Fingarette presents constructive approaches to heavy drinking, including new methods of helping heavy drinkers and social policies for preventing heavy drinking and the harms associated with it. " ############ ============================================================ " So this is how freedom dies -- to thunderous applause. " (Senator Padme Amidala in " Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith " ) ============================================================ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.