Guest guest Posted September 21, 2005 Report Share Posted September 21, 2005 At my prenatal check up yesterday, ketones showed up in my urine. I thought this happens when you go on a REALLY high fat diet... Here's what I ate: Breakfast (9am) -peach -2 scrambled eggs with cheddar and tomatoes -16 oz plain, raw kefir -2 figs Lunch (1:15pm) -large green salad with tomato, steak, avocado, and cucumber, dressed in olive oil and vinegar -small portion of tzatziki (yogurt, cucumber, garlic, lemon juice) -nettle tea I took the test around 2:30pm Any thoughts? Should I be worried? TIA, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2005 Report Share Posted September 21, 2005 , This is from labtestsonline.org: Ketones Ketones are intermediate products of fat metabolism. This happens when a person does not eat enough carbohydrates (for example, in cases of starvation or high-protein diets), or when a person eats enough carbohydrates but his body can't use them properly (for example, if he has diabetes mellitus). At this point the body metabolizes fat (instead of carbs) to get the energy it needs to keep functioning. Ketones in urine can give an early indication of insufficient insulin in a person who has diabetes. Severe exercise, exposure to cold, and loss of carbohydrates (such as in frequent vomiting) can also increase fat metabolism, resulting in ketonuria. Sincerely, Lana M. Gibbons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2005 Report Share Posted September 21, 2005 , I don't quite understand why you'd be concerned about ketones showing up in your urine, as I would think this would be normal and healthy to some degree, but look at your diet. It's like pure fat. Eggs are something like 75% fat, and kefir has more fat than it does protein or carbs, so your breakfast was definitely high-fat. Your lunch looks even higher-fat, as a proportion of calories, because it has less protein. Additionally, you had dairy at both meals, and the medium-chain fatty acids are ketogenic independent of carb concentration. But why is this a problem? Chris -- Statin Drugs Kill Your Brain And Cause Transient Global Amnesia: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/Statin-Drugs-Side-Effects.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 Hi Thanks for your input. My midwives were a bit concerned as this is " not normal " apparently. We didn't get into a whole discussion about it, but I don't really know anything about ketones and wanted to see what ya'll thought about it. Could it indicate that my body isn't using carbs as energy? I did eat fruit in the am, although my lunch wasn't carb-heavy at all. Is concern about ketones related to anti-fat thinking in general? On 9/21/05, Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: > , > > I don't quite understand why you'd be concerned about ketones showing > up in your urine, as I would think this would be normal and healthy to > some degree, but look at your diet. It's like pure fat. Eggs are > something like 75% fat, and kefir has more fat than it does protein or > carbs, so your breakfast was definitely high-fat. Your lunch looks > even higher-fat, as a proportion of calories, because it has less > protein. > > Additionally, you had dairy at both meals, and the medium-chain fatty > acids are ketogenic independent of carb concentration. > > But why is this a problem? > > Chris > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 Chris- >I don't quite understand why you'd be concerned about ketones showing >up in your urine, as I would think this would be normal and healthy to >some degree, but look at your diet. It's like pure fat. Eggs are >something like 75% fat, and kefir has more fat than it does protein or >carbs, so your breakfast was definitely high-fat. Your lunch looks >even higher-fat, as a proportion of calories, because it has less >protein. Pure fat? That sounds like an overstatement to me, and if you count lactic acid as a carb, kefir probably doesn't have more fat than protein or carb. Here's a speculative breakdown of 's breakfast: Breakfast (9am) -peach 1 large peach: 0g fat, 15g carb (13g sugar, 2g fiber), 1g protein -2 scrambled eggs with cheddar and tomatoes 2 large eggs: 14g fat, 2g carb (2g sugar), 14g protein 1oz. cheddar: 9g fat, 0g carb, 7g protein 1 medium tomato: 0g fat, 6g carb (1g fiber), 1g protein -16 oz plain, raw kefir 16oz. milk: 18g fat, 22g carb, 16g protein -2 figs 2 large raw figs: 0g fat, 24g carb (4g fiber, 20g sugar), 0g protein Obviously this is somewhat speculative, but based on USDA data and a couple guesses about portion size, which ought to yield at least an approximately accurate count, breakfast contained 41g of fat, 69g carb (7g fiber, 62g sugar and fermentation products thereof), 39g protein, yielding 410 calories from fat, 276 calories from carbs and 156 calories from protein, or 842 total calories, of which 49% were from fat, 33% were from carbs and 18% were from protein. I wouldn't call anything below 50% high fat, and certainly not " pure fat " , though obviously mainstream thought would hold that anything over 30% is high, and in some circles even 20-30% might be considered high. That said, I agree with you about the ketones -- I really doubt they mean anything bad. People conflate ketosis with ketoacidosis all the time, and it may be that anyone eating even a relatively high-fat diet will produce some. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 - What the heck, I'll break your lunch down too, just to be maximally annoying. For simplicity's sake I'm going to use lettuce for all your greens. Lunch (1:15pm) -large green salad with tomato, steak, avocado, and cucumber, dressed in olive oil and vinegar 1 cup shredded raw red leaf lettuce: 0g fat, 2g carb, 0g protein 1 large red ripe raw tomato: 1g fat, 8g carb (2g fiber), 2g protein 3oz. sirloin, cooked: 19g fat, 0g carb, 24g protein 1/2 an avocado: 13.5g fat, 7.5g carb (6g sugar, 0.5g fiber), 1.5g protein 1/2 cup cucumber w/ peel: 0g fat, 2g carb (0g fiber, 1g sugar), 0g protein 1T olive oil: 14g fat 1T ACV: 0g fat, 1g carb (1g sugar), 0g protein -small portion of tzatziki (yogurt, cucumber, garlic, lemon juice) 1/2 cup yoghurt: 4g fat, 5.5g carb (5.5g sugar), 4.5g protein 1/4 cup cucumber w/o peel: 0g fat, 3/4g carb (1/4g fiber, 1/2g sugar) 1/4g protein 1 clove garlic: 1g carb 1T lemon juice: 0g fat, 1.5g carb (0.5g sugar???), 0g protein -nettle tea 1 cup decaf black tea: 0g fat, 1g carb, 0g protein This is obviously more speculative than my breakfast breakdown, but so it goes: 51.5g fat, 30.25g carb, 32.25g protein, or 515 calories from fat, 121 calories from carbs and 129 calories from protein, or 67% from fat, 16% from carbs and 17% from protein, again disregarding the fact that some of your food will be used for structural purposes, especially during your pregnancy. This meal is higher in fat than your breakfast, relatively speaking, but it's likely lower in saturated fat, since so much of the fat (about half) came from highly monounsaturated sources (the avocado and the olive oil), which may or may not be a mildly undesirable thing. Actually, I'd worry less about eating some mono fat and more about just getting more saturated fat, but that's just me. More importantly, it seems to me you're just not eating nearly enough protein if these two meals are representative. 18% protein at breakfast and 17% at lunch (and that based on a generous estimate of how much steak was in your salad, meaning the actual numbers might be a lot lower!) might be OK for a woman in everyday life whose not doing anything much in the way of physical training, but when pregnant? Pregnancy certainly isn't my area of expertise, but I'd expect that a pregnant woman needs a lot more protein than you seem to be getting, so at the very least I'd strongly encourage you to look into the issue. I also wonder whether you're eating enough calories period. If dinner is on the order of breakfast and lunch, you might be eating a total of 2400 calories for the day. I don't remember exactly how tall you are, but I don't remember you being short, so while that might be a touch high under normal (non-pregnant) circumstances, it seems to me like it might be low when you're eating for two. Or maybe I'm completely wrong on that. Other people could doubtless give you better information on that subject, and maybe your appetite is adequate to the task of regulating your food intake, and maybe you're eating a bigger dinner. Just food for thought. If nothing else, I'd really consider replacing some of the fruit with meat, though. I seriously doubt you're getting enough protein unless you're eating heaps o' meat at dinner. If you're worried about the ketones -- and I doubt there's cause for worry -- test your blood sugar throughout the day to see if there's anything hinky going on. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 - >avocado I forgot to mention that on another list I'm on, a doctor says that avocados are extremely moldy. If so, they'd kind of seem contraindicated for pregnancy. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 i quite frequently had ketones in my urine while pregnant. the midwives always encouraged me to eat more, especially more protein. lisa > At my prenatal check up yesterday, ketones showed up in my urine. I > thought this happens when you go on a REALLY high fat diet... > > Here's what I ate: > > Breakfast (9am) > -peach > -2 scrambled eggs with cheddar and tomatoes > -16 oz plain, raw kefir > -2 figs > > Lunch (1:15pm) > -large green salad with tomato, steak, avocado, and cucumber, dressed > in olive oil and vinegar > -small portion of tzatziki (yogurt, cucumber, garlic, lemon juice) > -nettle tea > > I took the test around 2:30pm > > Any thoughts? Should I be worried? > > TIA, > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 -- You're right that " pure fat " was a silly slip. I guess I underestimated the carb content of some of the foods. Either way, fat was the dominant macronutrient in both meals, and especially if, as you say, her diet is moderately low-calorie, I don't think she's consuming enough carbs to suppress fat-burning (nor do I understand why this would necessarily be desireable.) Chris -- Statin Drugs Kill Your Brain And Cause Transient Global Amnesia: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/Statin-Drugs-Side-Effects.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 Chris- >I don't think she's >consuming enough carbs to suppress fat-burning (nor do I understand >why this would necessarily be desireable.) AFAIK the presence of ketones in her urine confirms that she's burning fat, but as there's no evidence that she's diabetic, I just can't see why that would be bad -- and more generally, I cannot imagine why anyone should ever want to suppress fat-burning. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 because they are pregnant? lisa > AFAIK the presence of ketones in her urine confirms that she's burning fat, > but as there's no evidence that she's diabetic, I just can't see why that > would be bad -- and more generally, I cannot imagine why anyone should ever > want to suppress fat-burning. > > > > > - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 - >because they are pregnant? >lisa > > > AFAIK the presence of ketones in her urine confirms that she's >burning fat, > > but as there's no evidence that she's diabetic, I just can't see why >that > > would be bad -- and more generally, I cannot imagine why anyone >should ever > > want to suppress fat-burning. Why? Burning fat is a relatively clean, healthy process. Burning sugar is comparatively dirty and harmful. Why would burning fat ever be bad? - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 On 9/22/05, lisa_mc_connell <mmlisa2@...> wrote: > because they are pregnant? Readily admitting I know _nothing_ about pregnancy-specific nutrition, that's not much of an answer. _Why_ is fat-burning undesirable when pregnant? Chris -- Statin Drugs Kill Your Brain And Cause Transient Global Amnesia: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/Statin-Drugs-Side-Effects.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 Chris- >Readily admitting I know _nothing_ about pregnancy-specific nutrition, >that's not much of an answer. _Why_ is fat-burning undesirable when >pregnant? This is complete and utter speculation, but it occurs to me that fat-burning might be even MORE desirable during pregnancy, because the developing fetus's own metabolism is doubtless influenced by the mother's, not to mention by the mix of nutrients it's getting. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 Sandy- >When I was pregnant and the doc found Ketones in my urine he was very >upset and told me that whatever I was doing to stop...he said, " you >are not supposed to produce ketones when pregnant! " He didn't say >why...the appointment previous to that one he had told me to stop >gaining weight so I cut out all bread and that's what I was doing >different. > >That was many years ago... I'm open to any kind of explanation of why ketones would be bad, but the general perception that they're bad (at any time) is because you're not " supposed " to burn fat, you're " supposed " to burn sugar, and ketones also appear in diabetics, meaning that ketone production is therefore regarded as a disaster. Atkins talked at length about this, and about why what he called " benign dietary ketosis " , as opposed to diabetic ketoacidosis, is a great thing. Admittedly he didn't discuss pregnancy (that I can recall) but I not only can't imagine why fat burning would be bad during pregnancy, I can imagine why it might be good, and none of Price's healthy natives (to my recollection) made any kind of point of eating more carbs during pregnancy. The focus always seemed to be on fats, fat-soluble nutrients and protein. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 - >My goal is to get >about 100 grams of protein in a day, but I don't count calories. Is there a reason for the 100g figure? Like I've said (and I won't bore you by saying it anymore) I'm no pregnancy expert & mdash; it's just not a subject I've looked into & mdash; but inasmuch as pregnancy is likened to the stress of bodybuilding but with a greater burden actually on the woman, I'd think 100g of protein would be on the light side, maybe very light. >I usually snack >throughout the afternoon on raw egg yolks, bone broth, brewer's yeast, >hummus and carrots, almond butter, and raw milk. Perhaps pregnancy changes the rules, but snacking through the day is never a good idea under any other condition, and if your own metabolism is in any way imprinting on your baby's, you could be slightly predisposing your kid to insulin/leptin metabolism problems even though most of those foods are nutritious and healthy. Unless there are known reasons for snacking during pregnancy, I'd really recommend following the leptin meal timing rules. >I do think I could >eat more meat in general, but I have source and budget issues, so I'm >doing the best that I can right now. Yeah, that's always a problem for the non-rich. Do you have a separate freezer? Is there any way you can order cheaper meats in bulk? >I'm thinking that adding some homemade sausage patties to breakfast >would be a great idea....perhaps lamb...mmmmm. Definitely! Sausage is a terrific food when made properly from good ingredients! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 On 9/22/05, Idol <Idol@...> wrote: > - > > >Adelle recommends 75-90g for pg. (slightly more during > >lactation) and Dr. Brewer (www.blueribbonbaby.org) recommends > >80-100g/day. I think these figures are based on what it takes to > >prevent toxemia. > > Huh, well, if that's what they say... except isn't toxemia a > protein-deficiency disease? And is 75-100g roughly the minimum dose > required to prevent it, or a little more than the minimum dose? If so, > isn't that analogous to establishing the RDA based on the minimum amount of > a nutrient required to prevent overt deficiency disease? I don't know -- > I'm just spitballing. Excellent point. I think I got 120 grams yesterday without much trouble. Re: the leptin issue, I'll keep it in mind, but I have so many other things to worry about right now that adding another " to do " might just break the camel's back, so to speak. On the other hand, it does make sense....does it explain, at least in part, the " French paradox? " Don't they avoid snacking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 - >Re: the leptin issue, I'll keep it in mind, but I have so >many other things to worry about right now that adding another " to do " >might just break the camel's back, so to speak. I know exactly what you mean, and my guess is that since you don't have significant leptin/insulin issues to begin with that I know of, and since you're eating good foods, the timing issue is probably less important for you during pregnancy and your baby than it would be for other pregnant women. > On the other hand, it >does make sense....does it explain, at least in part, the " French >paradox? " Don't they avoid snacking? Yeah, though they also tend to eat more nutritious foods in the first place, and nobody ever seems to look at that or factors like the breakdown of fats they eat compared to other cultures eating similar total amounts of fat. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 On 9/22/05, Idol <Idol@...> wrote: > Yeah, though they also tend to eat more nutritious foods in the first > place, and nobody ever seems to look at that or factors like the breakdown > of fats they eat compared to other cultures eating similar total amounts of > fat. Aren't hydrogenated oils banned in France? I seem to remember reading that a while back. Chris -- Statin Drugs Kill Your Brain And Cause Transient Global Amnesia: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/Statin-Drugs-Side-Effects.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2005 Report Share Posted September 23, 2005 Chris- >Aren't hydrogenated oils banned in France? I seem to remember reading >that a while back. They are according to the PPNF. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.