Guest guest Posted September 13, 2005 Report Share Posted September 13, 2005 It's not really that confusing - but then, you seem to be discombobulated by my suggestion to look for dosing methods of difficult foods that maximize the pleasure : mortification of the flesh ratio. Apparently, feeling sick, if only for a few moments, is both acceptable and preferable to the " hassle " of enjoying it as food. I've never been smacked so hard for a friendly sharing of pertinent knowledge/experience. I respond to a digest. Life is short. I only have so much time and patience to cut and paste. May I suggest that if it is difficult for you to keep even a tenuous grasp on threads of a conversation that is taking place within the same day and, my goodness, with the same heading, that some crucial micronutrients - say, humor and flexibility - may be lacking? , >Grain as we know it didn't exist until we began cultivating its ancestors. Same with pugs and dachshunds and whippets. Huh? Then why did humans cultivate it? Of course it existed. It was smaller and harder to process, but it clearly had utility, as did dogs. Moreover, the dung/stomach contents idea makes even more sense if you believe that early grain was so cellulose-protected that it would have low utility for humans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.