Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Mercola, was Re:Metabolic Typing was Detox Ideas

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi ,

> Do you mind elaborating a little about your experience with Dr.

> Plotkin. BTW, he is no longer at Dr. Mercola's clinic.

> I like Wanita have had a very positive experience with Metabolic

> Typing and have experienced incremental benefits.

I'd be happy to but it will take me a little time. In order to present my

experience properly (as it contains both good and bad) I have to tell the

whole story. My wife (who lurks here) tells me that my posts are too boring

already and that I need to prune them down for general consumption. LOL.

Can't do that with Dr. Mercola. I've seen so much said about him here on NN

and wanted to chime in but just didn't have the time to do justice to the

story and explain myself so that it would be fair to him. I'll get to it as

soon as I can.

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I will happily read the unabridged version should you chose to write it. vsp

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:36:39 -0500, RBJR <rbjr@...> wrote:

>

> Hi ,

>

> > Do you mind elaborating a little about your experience with Dr.

> > Plotkin. BTW, he is no longer at Dr. Mercola's clinic.

> > I like Wanita have had a very positive experience with Metabolic

> > Typing and have experienced incremental benefits.

>

> I'd be happy to but it will take me a little time. In order to present my

> experience properly (as it contains both good and bad) I have to tell the

> whole story. My wife (who lurks here) tells me that my posts are too boring

> already and that I need to prune them down for general consumption. LOL.

> Can't do that with Dr. Mercola. I've seen so much said about him here on NN

> and wanted to chime in but just didn't have the time to do justice to the

> story and explain myself so that it would be fair to him. I'll get to it as

> soon as I can.

>

> Ron

>

>

> <HTML><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC " -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN "

" http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd " ><BODY><FONT

FACE= " monospace " SIZE= " 3 " >

> <B>IMPORTANT ADDRESSES</B>

> <UL>

> <LI><B><A

HREF= " / " >NATIVE

NUTRITION</A></B> online</LI>

> <LI><B><A HREF= " http://onibasu.com/ " >SEARCH</A></B> the entire message

archive with Onibasu</LI>

> </UL></FONT>

> <PRE><FONT FACE= " monospace " SIZE= " 3 " ><B><A

HREF= " mailto: -owner " >LIST OWNER:</A></B>

Idol

> <B>MODERATORS:</B> Heidi Schuppenhauer

> Wanita Sears

> </FONT></PRE>

> </BODY>

> </HTML>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

[Ron] I'd be happy to but it will take me a little time. In order to present my

experience properly (as it contains both good and bad) I have to tell the

whole story. My wife (who lurks here) tells me that my posts are too boring

already and that I need to prune them down for general consumption. LOL.

Can't do that with Dr. Mercola. I've seen so much said about him here on NN

and wanted to chime in but just didn't have the time to do justice to the

story and explain myself so that it would be fair to him. I'll get to it as

soon as I can.

[MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read:

wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER. It's all about

content; we are liberated from the stifling, arbitrary, painful

limitations of print media! Don't limit your expression based on

speculation about your audience's attention span! Let the content

flow! To each their own usage of texts given an informational ecology

with radical latitude in signification and organizability, only

possible through textual surplus!

Err on the side of excess!

Support long texts!

There's a lot more I'd like to say about this topic...

Mike

SE Pennsylvania

The best way to predict the future is to invent it. --Alan Kay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> [MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read:

> wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER

Brevity..

" Apologies for the length of this letter, if I only had more time, it would have

been shorter " - Mark Twain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Quoting Bruce Stordock <stordock@...>:

>

> > [MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read:

> > wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER

>

> Brevity..

>

> " Apologies for the length of this letter, if I only had more time, it

> would have

> been shorter " - Mark Twain

There's an important point hidden beneath the superficial irony. The optimal

length of a non-literary text is " exactly as long as it needs to be, " and it

takes time, effort, and skill to achieve this. In some cases, more detailed

may be better, and clearer is always better, but all else being equal,

longer is always worse. Time is the dearest of nonrenewable resources, so

giving your readers the information they want as quickly as you know how is

a simple matter of courtesy.

--

Berg

bberg@...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Mike,

> [MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read:

> wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER. It's all about

> content; we are liberated from the stifling, arbitrary, painful

> limitations of print media! Don't limit your expression based on

> speculation about your audience's attention span! Let the content

> flow! To each their own usage of texts given an informational ecology

> with radical latitude in signification and organizability, only

> possible through textual surplus!

>

> Err on the side of excess!

>

> Support long texts!

>

> There's a lot more I'd like to say about this topic...

LOL.

I hear you and I'll continue on in my standard form. And thanks for the

support.

So what did you think of that, ?

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi ,

> The optimal

> length of a non-literary text is " exactly as long as it needs

> to be, "

Funny, those are exactly the words I raised in my defense when my wife told

me my posts were too detailed and diverged from the topic at hand too much.

Having gone back and re-read a couple of my old posts I will plead guilty to

them being a little bit too long, but in general I found that they were

pretty much as long as they needed to be in order to make my argument or

convey my point.

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...