Guest guest Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 Hi , > Do you mind elaborating a little about your experience with Dr. > Plotkin. BTW, he is no longer at Dr. Mercola's clinic. > I like Wanita have had a very positive experience with Metabolic > Typing and have experienced incremental benefits. I'd be happy to but it will take me a little time. In order to present my experience properly (as it contains both good and bad) I have to tell the whole story. My wife (who lurks here) tells me that my posts are too boring already and that I need to prune them down for general consumption. LOL. Can't do that with Dr. Mercola. I've seen so much said about him here on NN and wanted to chime in but just didn't have the time to do justice to the story and explain myself so that it would be fair to him. I'll get to it as soon as I can. Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 I will happily read the unabridged version should you chose to write it. vsp On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:36:39 -0500, RBJR <rbjr@...> wrote: > > Hi , > > > Do you mind elaborating a little about your experience with Dr. > > Plotkin. BTW, he is no longer at Dr. Mercola's clinic. > > I like Wanita have had a very positive experience with Metabolic > > Typing and have experienced incremental benefits. > > I'd be happy to but it will take me a little time. In order to present my > experience properly (as it contains both good and bad) I have to tell the > whole story. My wife (who lurks here) tells me that my posts are too boring > already and that I need to prune them down for general consumption. LOL. > Can't do that with Dr. Mercola. I've seen so much said about him here on NN > and wanted to chime in but just didn't have the time to do justice to the > story and explain myself so that it would be fair to him. I'll get to it as > soon as I can. > > Ron > > > <HTML><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC " -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN " " http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd " ><BODY><FONT FACE= " monospace " SIZE= " 3 " > > <B>IMPORTANT ADDRESSES</B> > <UL> > <LI><B><A HREF= " / " >NATIVE NUTRITION</A></B> online</LI> > <LI><B><A HREF= " http://onibasu.com/ " >SEARCH</A></B> the entire message archive with Onibasu</LI> > </UL></FONT> > <PRE><FONT FACE= " monospace " SIZE= " 3 " ><B><A HREF= " mailto: -owner " >LIST OWNER:</A></B> Idol > <B>MODERATORS:</B> Heidi Schuppenhauer > Wanita Sears > </FONT></PRE> > </BODY> > </HTML> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 [Ron] I'd be happy to but it will take me a little time. In order to present my experience properly (as it contains both good and bad) I have to tell the whole story. My wife (who lurks here) tells me that my posts are too boring already and that I need to prune them down for general consumption. LOL. Can't do that with Dr. Mercola. I've seen so much said about him here on NN and wanted to chime in but just didn't have the time to do justice to the story and explain myself so that it would be fair to him. I'll get to it as soon as I can. [MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read: wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER. It's all about content; we are liberated from the stifling, arbitrary, painful limitations of print media! Don't limit your expression based on speculation about your audience's attention span! Let the content flow! To each their own usage of texts given an informational ecology with radical latitude in signification and organizability, only possible through textual surplus! Err on the side of excess! Support long texts! There's a lot more I'd like to say about this topic... Mike SE Pennsylvania The best way to predict the future is to invent it. --Alan Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 > [MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read: > wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER Brevity.. " Apologies for the length of this letter, if I only had more time, it would have been shorter " - Mark Twain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Quoting Bruce Stordock <stordock@...>: > > > [MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read: > > wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER > > Brevity.. > > " Apologies for the length of this letter, if I only had more time, it > would have > been shorter " - Mark Twain There's an important point hidden beneath the superficial irony. The optimal length of a non-literary text is " exactly as long as it needs to be, " and it takes time, effort, and skill to achieve this. In some cases, more detailed may be better, and clearer is always better, but all else being equal, longer is always worse. Time is the dearest of nonrenewable resources, so giving your readers the information they want as quickly as you know how is a simple matter of courtesy. -- Berg bberg@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2005 Report Share Posted March 31, 2005 Hi Mike, > [MAP] Hello Ron, your posts are very interesting and I'm a firm (read: > wild-eyed, militaristic) believer in LONGER IS BETTER. It's all about > content; we are liberated from the stifling, arbitrary, painful > limitations of print media! Don't limit your expression based on > speculation about your audience's attention span! Let the content > flow! To each their own usage of texts given an informational ecology > with radical latitude in signification and organizability, only > possible through textual surplus! > > Err on the side of excess! > > Support long texts! > > There's a lot more I'd like to say about this topic... LOL. I hear you and I'll continue on in my standard form. And thanks for the support. So what did you think of that, ? Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2005 Report Share Posted March 31, 2005 Hi , > The optimal > length of a non-literary text is " exactly as long as it needs > to be, " Funny, those are exactly the words I raised in my defense when my wife told me my posts were too detailed and diverged from the topic at hand too much. Having gone back and re-read a couple of my old posts I will plead guilty to them being a little bit too long, but in general I found that they were pretty much as long as they needed to be in order to make my argument or convey my point. Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.