Guest guest Posted July 6, 2005 Report Share Posted July 6, 2005 Hi Has anyone read and starting utilizing Check's book? Also, are the type of foods he advocates the same as WAP, similar or different? jafa __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2005 Report Share Posted July 6, 2005 His food recommendations seem to be very similar. His exercise and stretching programs are very good also. I have had a CHEK trainer customize a program for me that incorporates many of the exercises and stretches from the book and I am very happy with the results. > Hi > > Has anyone read and starting utilizing Check's > book? Also, are the type of foods he advocates the > same as WAP, similar or different? > > jafa > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2005 Report Share Posted July 6, 2005 I'm about 2/3 through reading it. He is WAP in that he stresses organic, whole foods including animal foods. He strongly supports organic, non-processed, GMO-free, non-irradiated foods, raw milk, pastured meat/eggs, traditional fats, celtic salt, natural sweeteners, etc. Nothing really new there. One huge hole is he doesn't mention fermented foods at all, even in his chapter on digestive health! The second aspect of his " 'no-diet' diet " is metabolic typing which others have pointed out are too low in fat (10% for carb types, 20% fat for protein types) and a misinterpretation of WAP. Interesting reading though. I think he does know what he's talking about as far as the physical mechanics of the body (movement) and how to best exercise. He has a lot of exercises he goes over and you'd have to be pretty dedictated to do them I think. jafa <jafasum@...> wrote: Hi Has anyone read and starting utilizing Check's book? Also, are the type of foods he advocates the same as WAP, similar or different? jafa __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2005 Report Share Posted July 8, 2005 The second aspect of his " 'no-diet' diet " is metabolic typing which others have pointed out are too low in fat (10% for carb types, 20% fat for protein types) and a misinterpretation of WAP. > > > Pretty sure there's reference to Check's bodybuilding metabolic typing program in Metabolic Man which is out on loan. MTD didn't work for my protein type or Warrior Diet until I read in Rudolph Wiley's Biobalance to eat animal protein 3X day using your ideal body weight divided by 15 for grams as a guide with no dairy protein substitutes. Haven't kept up with Mercola on that. Fat is low throughout. I don't count other than carbs. Fat and protein has to be above ratios. For some reason the ratios probably from on held and were repeated as basic guidelines. One researcher I've read had a slight variation, iirc. Carb types could count protein. What I find is important is if you're a carb or protein type, you should keep to foods in your type as much as possible because these are the foods found to acidify the too alkaline carb type or alkalinize the too acidic protein type. Mixed types have more choices. Too much of protein and/or carb type only choices could throw them off. what do you see Wolcott misrepresenting about WAP? Rereading, only assumption I could see is the high protein/fat he says only those of northern latitudes need vs. high carb only for southern latitudes. If that's it, it is too general. Example, I see ayurveda's vata as India's protein/hunter gatherer type. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2005 Report Share Posted July 9, 2005 > what do you see Wolcott misrepresenting about WAP? Rereading, only > assumption I could see is the high protein/fat he says only those of > northern latitudes need vs. high carb only for southern latitudes. If that's > it, it is too general. Example, I see ayurveda's vata as India's > protein/hunter gatherer type. > Wanita, I don't know Wolcott's work, but vata type is not what I would describe as protein/hunter gatherer. Vata has poor/irregular digestion and difficulty digesting proteins. Pitta has very strong digestion and appetite, typically, high metabolism, but difficulty with high fat and kapha has slow, steady metabolism and difficulty digesting carbs. They are the adult-onset diabetes crowd. B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2005 Report Share Posted July 10, 2005 > Wanita, > I don't know Wolcott's work, but vata type is not what I would > describe as protein/hunter gatherer. Vata has poor/irregular > digestion and difficulty digesting proteins. Pitta has very strong > digestion and appetite, typically, high metabolism, but difficulty > with high fat and kapha has slow, steady metabolism and difficulty > digesting carbs. They are the adult-onset diabetes crowd. , Test out vata, pitta, kapha. Vata used to have larger difference from pitta. Found once I reduced and cleaned up the carbs, that I digest protein and fat better than I ever did carbs. Digestion has always been an issue though. My reasoning with the correlation is from the diet chart links you sent. Vata diet allows the high purine dark meats, allows all nuts and mostly avoids leafy greens making vata the closest of the three to metabolic typing protein diet. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2005 Report Share Posted July 11, 2005 > Test out vata, pitta, kapha. Vata used to have larger difference from pitta. > Found once I reduced and cleaned up the carbs, that I digest protein and fat > better than I ever did carbs. Digestion has always been an issue though. My > reasoning with the correlation is from the diet chart links you sent. Vata > diet allows the high purine dark meats, allows all nuts and mostly avoids > leafy greens making vata the closest of the three to metabolic typing > protein diet. > Wanita, I understand what you're saying. I was thrown by the description " hunter " because the vata is classically very thin, small, delicate frame. Or else they are the disproportionately tall, lanky, basketball-player type. Anything irregular, with knobby joints, crooked nose, teeth, etc. Difficulty adding mass to the body. They are the creative ones, artists, with light, airy minds and/or quick, unpredictable movements, but not so much stamina. They can eat the protein, but generally need therapy first to tone their digestive tracts, which are typically problematic and unreliable. They should eat small meals fairly frequently to keep from getting spacey. The reason they are supposed to eat that stuff is the propensity toward dryness of the tissues--they need constant oiling and grounding to provide a conducting substance for their erratic electrical impulses. If you don't have the physical characteristics of vata, you wouldn't be vata, but have a vata disturbance--which is endemic to the erratic, rapid-moving nature of these modern times. B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.