Guest guest Posted July 2, 2005 Report Share Posted July 2, 2005 In correspondence on another list, Ray Peat said that all meat is a decent source of dehydroascorbate, which is the oxidized, more lipid-soluble form, of vitamin C, the presence of which is not reflected in assays testing for the reduced, water-soluble form, ascorbate. Presumably this is only the case in raw or rare meats, as vitamin C is, to my understanding, heat-labile. He also provided several studies showing the adsorption of dehdyroascorbate into cells to be much greater than the adsorption of ascorbate into cells. Dehydroascorbate is then rapidly converted into ascorbate inside the cell. So obtaining a dietary source of dehydroascorbate would be a much more effective way to increase intracellular ascorbate than obtaining a dietary source of ascorbate itself. So the take-away, somewhat baffling point, would appear to be that raw or rare meats are as good or possibly a better source of vitamin C than most fruits and vegetables! I've so far been unable to find an analysis of *amounts* of dehydroascorbate in foods. It could be that a serving of meat has just a few mg, but with much more effective delivery. But any case this is a shocker to my long-held paradigm in which vitamin C was essentially a plant-associated nutrient. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.