Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 Okay y'all. I am taking my own advice and rereading the psycho message from hell. Paste these tid bits together and tell me what ya get. I have omitted the quotes already addressed, btw. " Well, not exactly this post, but one of the reactions I got to it, namely the one coming from Gene, whom I'll call henceforth Mr. Schwartz, because I want to keep a certain distance from him and look at him as if he were a mature person, older than Pan. Gene sounds too intimate, anyway. " [Gene is diseased, that is the thesis] .... " Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but now this must be clearly instilled into Mr. Schwartz: It's very easy to criticize the Church (any urchin can do that, you know, about how boring the mass can be) and to accuse the Church of being sexist and homophobic. " [get it now buddy? When will you fall into line behind JC?] .... " I'm exposing both of us, not only him. " [Credibility factor that many dupes fell for without evidence] .... " Of course he made me hit the ceiling - and if not for the concrete slab under the roof of this house, I'd have plunged into space. In other words, I flamed back, but in every way I was much milder than Mr. Schwartz. My first reaction was to think: " Is this man talking to himself aloud? " But then I simply suggested he was insane, or if a more neutral wording had occurred to me, I would have said he had an emotional disorder, or even that he was a case of sociopathy. " [he made me shoot my wife, yeah right, tell it to the judge] .... " ...but he was very vocal about it... " [unless y'all talk on the phone, " vocal " is meaningless] .... " Mr. Schwartz thinks that I've offended him and harassed him. I'm not very sure that I did so, but he was very vocal about it, so I'm tempted to believe him. I was even under the impression he would sue me for sending him a further e-mail. Anyway, isn't my leaving the group the best toll I can pay him for any personal damage, even if it were only a by-product of a quixotic fantasy? " [if you post my address on this or any other list I will call Interpol, get it JC? I was mistaken, but don't push your luck] .... " If they were my primary reasons, it would imply that I was yielding to Mr. Schwartz too much control over my own life and decision-making and that I had no doubts about the things he shared with me about myself. And this rationale couldn't be real, could it? I am not in delirium, you know. " [No, I don't know] .... " I don't know if Mr. Schwartz, too, needs psychotherapy. If he has no cash to pay for a serious treatment, he ought to consider the therapeutic value of falling in love, going hunting or simply greeting the trees he passes by. Any of these would make him a more compassionate man. " [Ad hominem, lala la la laalaa] .... " Let me cast some pearls before the swine. " [what I see as veiled antisemitism] .... " He can be smart, but he generally lacks depth and wisdom. He pretends to be serious, but is in fact ill-tempered. He lacks humour, but not irony and sarcasm. He lacks patience, but not tricks to impress people, maybe to threaten them as well. " [ , I would hope that you would delete this message or really respond to its hostility, as I can't continue for now. Maybe a part two is in order] Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 On 9/6/05, Deanna Wagner <hl@...> wrote: > Okay y'all. I am taking my own advice and rereading the psycho message > from hell. Paste these tid bits together and tell me what ya get. I > have omitted the quotes already addressed, btw. Oh let it go. You're being as bad as anything now by protracting this and aggravating the fighting words. I think this subject, at least in terms of responding to the actual content of his post, should be ended as inappropriate. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 > >Oh let it go. You're being as bad as anything now by protracting this >and aggravating the fighting words. > > I am being as bad. What does that mean? I am honest. I have dropped the subject, but I am disappointed. Are you worried your commercial interests will suffer by this discussion? If y'all want to change the rules, go ahead. But make them plain as day if ya do, okay? has their own rules anyhoo. Squelch the dissenters. I'll leave, no problemo. How funny to have to be politically correct on a list that bashes political correctness in the mainstream, as does your website, Masterjohn. Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 Deanna- >Squelch the dissenters. I'll leave, no problemo. How funny to have to >be politically correct on a list that bashes political correctness in >the mainstream, as does your website, Masterjohn. WTF are you talking about? Squelch the dissenters? The dissenters have enjoyed abundant opportunities to air their views. This is an off-topic navel-gazing argument that's turning uglier by the minute and does nothing to advance the mission of native nutrition. And any " dissenters " who feel " squelched " are welcome to email me offlist. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 On 9/6/05, Deanna Wagner <hl@...> wrote: > I am being as bad. What does that mean? I am honest. I have dropped > the subject, but I am disappointed. Are you worried your commercial > interests will suffer by this discussion? What on earth are you talking about? What commercial interest do I have in this list??? > If y'all want to change the > rules, go ahead. But make them plain as day if ya do, okay? has > their own rules anyhoo. I don't know what you're talking about. This thread is quite clearly personal trash. The list is supposed to be free of personal trash. All the stuff about Gene in the beginning of this thread was personal trash. > Squelch the dissenters. I'll leave, no problemo. Dissenters? Wouldn't there have to be an opposing mainstream view in order to make you a dissenter? Far as I can tell, no one has stuck up for JC's original post with respect to its remarks about Gene and the personal exchange. So I don't see how you are " dissenting. " > How funny to have to > be politically correct on a list that bashes political correctness in > the mainstream, as does your website, Masterjohn. Either I am very unperceptive, or your interpretation of the phrase " political correctness " is seriously flawed. Chris -- Want the other side of the cholesterol story? Find out what your doctor isn't telling you: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 >Either I am very unperceptive, or your interpretation of the phrase > " political correctness " is seriously flawed. > It has been a very stressful week here and nationwide. May we please chalk it up to that and get on with fall garden discussions and infant nutrition soon? Okay? I promise to have some good tidbits coming soon. No offense intended. Deanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.