Guest guest Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 Well, Clay, Actually the research has begun to show the IQ assumptions about persons with autism have been deeply flawed, and though general assumptions are usually wrong, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the ARC doesn't get the needs of the majority of the kids with autism because the majority of the kids with autism DON'T have mental retardation. Autism is a communication disorder, so the fact that they can't express their thoughts verbally in a timely manner makes them appear to have an IQ below 70. You would appear to have an IQ below 70 if I gave you an IQ test in Russian or any other language in which you were not fluent. I know of NO person with only mental retardation who went through an intensive behavioral therapy program and emerged to function at grade level. Also, programs designed to help children with mental retardation most--intensive stimulation through lots of activities, sights, and sounds--make a kid with autism completely shut down. So in that sense the ARC doesn't have the best interest of the majority of kids with autism in mind. Just being a long established organization doesn't make one good in all areas. It just makes you long established.[ Singleton] The FDA is a long established organization too and so is the IRS, Medicaid, etc. I could go on. The ARC has actually come out in Houston on the CDC side of the vaccine argument and promote the Istitute of Medicine study in their newletter. So please check out exactly what the ARC is doing right NOW to help the majority of people with autism before cutting short one of the most dedicated autism advocates in Texas who is making a positive difference in promoting effective education and treatment for kids with autism. If you want to be offended, be offended that a group that supposedly advocates for kids with developmental disabilities would be so at odds with what that community has defined as its needs. Does the ARC treat all of the populations it serves with equal disdain????? S. Arc of Texas As a new member of the Board of Directors of The Arc of Texas, and the father of two children with autism, I disagree with your opinion that they " do not have a good understanding of the unique needs of individuals on the autism spectrum " . The Arc organizations in the United States have been working to serve the needs of people with developmental disabilities since long before most of us were born. While it's everyone's right to disagree on specific issues, it would be inappropriate to suggest information should not be communicated simply because we disagree with it. I'm not sure, but isn't that one of the principles America was founded on? - Clay > > If you will notice in this information forwarded from the Arc of > Texas, they DO NOT support the majority of the state autism plan. > IMHO, they simply do not have a good understanding of the unique needs > of individuals on the autism spectrum. They also do not support and in > fact are very strongly opposed to autism waivers. > > I would, unless you agree with the Arc's position and are against the > majority of the state plan, avoid forwarding this particular email and > info to folks who plan to testify on Thursday. > > nna > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.