Guest guest Posted February 22, 2005 Report Share Posted February 22, 2005 > Re: Re: POLITICS - Banning Soy Formula > > > >In a message dated 2/17/05 9:48:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, >jaq@... >writes: > >> As for the soy formula issue, your analogy of stifled good vs. >> encouraged evil breaks down on both ends. IF the government COULD ban >> vitamin A, we'd soon all be dead anyway. And cyanide is generally >> recognized as poison, whereas soy is not (if it were, nobody would buy >> the stuff, and this would be a moot issue) >____ > >Yeah, you're right. The WAPF case against soy formula is pretty weak, and >it's more of a hunch. I happen to think the probability of that >hunch being >correct is very close to certainty, but I really don't have the >evidence to back >it up. I'm not clear on what you are referring to as a " hunch " ? The idea that soy infant formula is unhealthy? Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2005 Report Share Posted February 22, 2005 In a message dated 2/22/05 12:38:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, s.fisher22@... writes: > I'm not clear on what you are referring to as a " hunch " ? The idea that soy > infant formula is unhealthy? ____ Well I meant the idea that the hormones in soy are making a partial contribution to the trend of early maturation, which is particularly pronounced in African American girls, who have double the rate of soy formula consumption as the total population, as well as a greater average rate of exposure to xenoestrogens. There are other important points, like the lack of galactose which is important for brain development, although maybe some soy manufactures add it in or at least certainly could. Chris ____ " What can one say of a soul, of a heart, filled with compassion? It is a heart which burns with love for every creature: for human beings, birds, and animals, for serpents and for demons. The thought of them and the sight of them make the tears of the saint flow. And this immense and intense compassion, which flows from the heart of the saints, makes them unable to bear the sight of the smallest, most insignificant wound in any creature. Thus they pray ceaselessly, with tears, even for animals, for enemies of the truth, and for those who do them wrong. " --Saint Isaac the Syrian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2005 Report Share Posted February 22, 2005 Chris- >I'll take your word that that's true, but the WIC program does dole out >formula, and as a result, families on the WIC program are twice as likely >to use >formula as the general population I don't know about WIC -- I'll take your word for it -- but I guarantee you that Irene is right. Formula manufacturers deluge doctors with " starter packs " of formula and the like. They're marketing tools. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.