Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 Hi Bob, The audio microphone on the thunder ball plasma lamps will only switch to around 50Hz. This is for display purposes. No need on activiting the plasma streams faster than we can see. Hence the modification puts the audio frequency signal right on the power transistor's base pin to get the correct signal broadcast. Some people get the audio sampling rate mixed up with the output frequency level. Most sound system these days sample at a default rate of around 41kHz and some go to 96kHz with top end audio generators sampling at 128kHz. Sampling is the number of digital points available to make-up a 1 second signal. Usually, if you can hear it, then the frequency will be below 15kHz (very young ears may hear this high). I doubt there would be anyone on this list who can hear 15kHz. I can just hear 11kHz on a good stereo/speaker system. 20kHz and beyond will be picked up by animals, but not by our audio receptors. Regards, Ken Uzzell http://heal-me.com.au FreX - CHIamp - FDS rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for hooking up to a > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some chepo > rife > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how about just > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be > slightly > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that matter? > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously > driving > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & also > triggering a plasma ball? > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed speakers > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that do > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? > ...adding > in the plasma ball to all? > > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several ways > from > available sources. > > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only designed to > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic Research titanium > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical output from > my > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the usual 20 khz > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does frex16 do freqs > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a few freqs > on > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more expensive > machines. > > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for electronics > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. if i get a > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz somehow might i > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various arrangements > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd like to have a > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 hi Ken, i was thinking the advantage of the plasma device is radiant energy of higher freqs (low RF) getting into the body other than through the eyes or ears, so the better the freq response the more useful? was i wrong about that...i thought i read it somewhere but it may have been an assumption (stuff gets a jumbled up - i should keep notes) & the idea of using higher than audible freqs in audio gear has a lot to do with the complex harmonics many of which are in the audible range? my aging & artillery abused ears seem to still be unusually sensitive for a male, but i should actually go to an audiologist & determine the reality of that. maybe +/-500 high-dose acid trips a few decades ago has something to do with it, but it's like i can almost feel sound with my nervous system aside from what i hear with my ears. on the one hand i often hear things young women don't, on the other i make people repeat themselves a lot but that might be more of a concentration & processing speed problem. > Re: rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... > > > Hi Bob, > > The audio microphone on the thunder ball plasma lamps will only switch to > around 50Hz. This is for display purposes. No need on activiting > the plasma > streams faster than we can see. Hence the modification puts the audio > frequency signal right on the power transistor's base pin to get > the correct > signal broadcast. > > Some people get the audio sampling rate mixed up with the output > frequency > level. > > Most sound system these days sample at a default rate of around 41kHz and > some go to 96kHz with top end audio generators sampling at > 128kHz. Sampling > is the number of digital points available to make-up a 1 second signal. > > Usually, if you can hear it, then the frequency will be below 15kHz (very > young ears may hear this high). I doubt there would be anyone on > this list > who can hear 15kHz. I can just hear 11kHz on a good stereo/speaker system. > > 20kHz and beyond will be picked up by animals, but not by our audio > receptors. > > Regards, > Ken Uzzell > http://heal-me.com.au > FreX - CHIamp - FDS > > > rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... > > > > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for > hooking up to a > > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. > > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some chepo > > rife > > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how > about just > > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be > > slightly > > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that matter? > > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also > > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? > > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously > > driving > > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & also > > triggering a plasma ball? > > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed speakers > > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that do > > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? > > ...adding > > in the plasma ball to all? > > > > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several ways > > from > > available sources. > > > > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only > designed to > > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic > Research titanium > > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical > output from > > my > > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the > usual 20 khz > > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does > frex16 do freqs > > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a > few freqs > > on > > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more > expensive > > machines. > > > > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for > electronics > > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. > if i get a > > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz > somehow might i > > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various > arrangements > > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd > like to have a > > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to me. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 Ken: You are correct on the 50 Hz cutoff, but I got one h___of a herx from it at 26.7 Hz having Lyme disease. Do you know the typical gases used? I believe the globe design fully ionzes and deionzes to produce very strong E- field output. Not many designs offer this fully transitional state so quickly with a large pulsed field. Ken Uzzell wrote: Hi Bob, The audio microphone on the thunder ball plasma lamps will only switch to around 50Hz. This is for display purposes. No need on activiting the plasma streams faster than we can see. Hence the modification puts the audio frequency signal right on the power transistor's base pin to get the correct signal broadcast. Some people get the audio sampling rate mixed up with the output frequency level. Most sound system these days sample at a default rate of around 41kHz and some go to 96kHz with top end audio generators sampling at 128kHz. Sampling is the number of digital points available to make-up a 1 second signal. Usually, if you can hear it, then the frequency will be below 15kHz (very young ears may hear this high). I doubt there would be anyone on this list who can hear 15kHz. I can just hear 11kHz on a good stereo/speaker system. 20kHz and beyond will be picked up by animals, but not by our audio receptors. Regards, Ken Uzzell http://heal-me.com.au FreX - CHIamp - FDS rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for hooking up to a > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some chepo > rife > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how about just > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be > slightly > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that matter? > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously > driving > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & also > triggering a plasma ball? > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed speakers > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that do > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? > ...adding > in the plasma ball to all? > > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several ways > from > available sources. > > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only designed to > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic Research titanium > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical output from > my > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the usual 20 khz > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does frex16 do freqs > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a few freqs > on > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more expensive > machines. > > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for electronics > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. if i get a > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz somehow might i > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various arrangements > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd like to have a > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to me. --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2006 Report Share Posted October 24, 2006 Hi Bob, I always remember what told us when I asked about the differences between plasma transmitters and contact pads. He advised us that they both have different healing properties and work slightly differently. The plasma transmitters are said to be faster in the beginning, and it has been recommended to start using plasma transmitters when first experimenting with Rife on a health issue. Then contact pads are introduced to provide healing support to the plasma signals and assist in a persons return to health. Some EMEM's can also be used in contact mode, but I do not know if this is the same as using two electrodes on the body, I would think it would be much the same. Vendors and experts have reported that using EMEM's in contact mode have produced good value. I would think it is like having a contact system and a radiant plasma system in one transmitter. I've used simple contact pads with square waves, and sine waves, and both wave forms have produced positive physiological changes in the body. The square waves with its many sine wave harmonics, and the sine wave alone without any harmonics. If RF is used in the transmitter, then it appears to be a case by case situation. Most people respond well to RF and their body is able to diffuse any RF loading or stress placed on the fascia. But some people experience EM sensitivities and RF can amplify this. This does not appear to be the case with the B/R system, as we are instructed to sit back from the plasma tube, out of the strong RF field. Bruce Stenulson is not in favour of using a spark plug gap to generate RF, and he goes into details on his web site. http://www.stenulson.net/ Hey Bruce, I like the new photo, a very handsome man :-) Dr Loyd has found great value from his research with the spark plug gap and RF, so this makes me think how important it is when the experts tell us to start out slowly, so we have time to evaluate our response to this therapy and make adjustments accordingly. http://www.royalrife.com/ It is always very important to have Dr. Nenah Sylver's book " The Handbook Of Rife Frequency Healing " close by for further reference, instructions and guidelines. http://www.nenahsylver.com/ A few years back many people in a town in America were infected with a virus. A Rife therapist was called upon to heal the town, but the frequencies used had no effect on the virus. Then some experts who really know about microbes were able to devise new frequencies to use, and thus the town was healed. The origional discussions could still be in the archives of this forum, although it was some years back. I believe a B/R instrument was used. This experience clearly displayed the value of different frequencies and their effect on microbes in the body, even though it is extremely difficult to kill microbes that are not in the body. Regards, Ken Uzzell http://heal-me.com.au FreX - CHIamp - FDS rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... >> >> >> > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for >> hooking up to a >> > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. >> > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some chepo >> > rife >> > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how >> about just >> > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be >> > slightly >> > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that matter? >> > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also >> > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? >> > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously >> > driving >> > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & also >> > triggering a plasma ball? >> > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed speakers >> > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that do >> > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? >> > ...adding >> > in the plasma ball to all? >> > >> > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several ways >> > from >> > available sources. >> > >> > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only >> designed to >> > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic >> Research titanium >> > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical >> output from >> > my >> > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the >> usual 20 khz >> > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does >> frex16 do freqs >> > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a >> few freqs >> > on >> > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more >> expensive >> > machines. >> > >> > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for >> electronics >> > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. >> if i get a >> > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz >> somehow might i >> > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various >> arrangements >> > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd >> like to have a >> > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to me. >> >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2006 Report Share Posted October 24, 2006 Just curious. Why didn't we hear about the town that was healed by rife technology on the news like on ABC or on NBC news? Josh rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... >>> >>> >>> > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for >>> hooking up to a >>> > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. >>> > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some chepo >>> > rife >>> > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how >>> about just >>> > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be >>> > slightly >>> > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that matter? >>> > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also >>> > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? >>> > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously >>> > driving >>> > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & >>> > also >>> > triggering a plasma ball? >>> > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed speakers >>> > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that do >>> > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? >>> > ...adding >>> > in the plasma ball to all? >>> > >>> > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several ways >>> > from >>> > available sources. >>> > >>> > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only >>> designed to >>> > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic >>> Research titanium >>> > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical >>> output from >>> > my >>> > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the >>> usual 20 khz >>> > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does >>> frex16 do freqs >>> > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a >>> few freqs >>> > on >>> > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more >>> expensive >>> > machines. >>> > >>> > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for >>> electronics >>> > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. >>> if i get a >>> > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz >>> somehow might i >>> > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various >>> arrangements >>> > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd >>> like to have a >>> > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to me. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2006 Report Share Posted October 24, 2006 Hi , The Chinese novelty plasma balls do output a good ES field. I think Dr Ian MacLeod said these balls have a mixture of Xeon and Neon. Regards, Ken Uzzell http://heal-me.com.au FreX - CHIamp - FDS Re: rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... Ken: You are correct on the 50 Hz cutoff, but I got one h___of a herx from it at 26.7 Hz having Lyme disease. Do you know the typical gases used? I believe the globe design fully ionzes and deionzes to produce very strong E- field output. Not many designs offer this fully transitional state so quickly with a large pulsed field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2006 Report Share Posted October 24, 2006 Hi Josh, I'm not to sure why not, although Rifers are smart and tend to avoid publicity because in the past it has been turned around and used against them. Best to just go in, do the healing, tell everyone to be quite, and get on with life until the next drama comes along. It was a very inspiring story and really helped me get through a rough time when a friend of mine didn't respond too well from the frequencies I was using. Gosh, it was a small town, may be only a village so it would probably go under the media microscope. You should have seen the stories and testimonials that use to be put on the web, it was like Jim Bare was going to heal the world with his B/R machine. No wonder the FDA wanted things to go quiet. It seems if it is kept quiet then we are left alone to do our research. As I have said before, it makes sense for the US government and pharmaceuticals to allow a small group of researchers like us a certain level of freedom, because it will be from small groups like us where major health improvements might just come from. Just look what is brewing with Dr. Ian MacLeod in China, and he has spent much resources in researching Rife. If one of these pandemic virus got out and started circulating, the only safe place on this planet would be near one of our Rife type frequency machines. The media is rife in Australia brewing up public fear of some bird virus that is already in Indonesia and ready to come across the small stretch of water and into Australia. They say the virus on the birds has already crossed to humans so specialists are frantically checking all the wildlife in Northern Australia. Regards, Ken Uzzell http://heal-me.com.au FreX - CHIamp - FDS rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... >>>> >>>> >>>> > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for >>>> hooking up to a >>>> > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. >>>> > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some >>>> > chepo >>>> > rife >>>> > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how >>>> about just >>>> > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be >>>> > slightly >>>> > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that >>>> > matter? >>>> > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also >>>> > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? >>>> > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously >>>> > driving >>>> > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & >>>> > also >>>> > triggering a plasma ball? >>>> > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed speakers >>>> > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that >>>> > do >>>> > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? >>>> > ...adding >>>> > in the plasma ball to all? >>>> > >>>> > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several >>>> > ways >>>> > from >>>> > available sources. >>>> > >>>> > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only >>>> designed to >>>> > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic >>>> Research titanium >>>> > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical >>>> output from >>>> > my >>>> > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the >>>> usual 20 khz >>>> > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does >>>> frex16 do freqs >>>> > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a >>>> few freqs >>>> > on >>>> > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more >>>> expensive >>>> > machines. >>>> > >>>> > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for >>>> electronics >>>> > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. >>>> if i get a >>>> > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz >>>> somehow might i >>>> > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various >>>> arrangements >>>> > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd >>>> like to have a >>>> > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to >>>> > me. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2006 Report Share Posted October 24, 2006 You know, it may not be nice to say this...But maybe what the United states needs sometime soon is some kind of virus to get out. And no matter what the FDA tries and the drug industry tries there will be no drugs can can cure or even affect the virus in any way. I'm talking about a fast acting virus...Would it be a bad thing if people start dying off? yes it would. But sometimes good things can come from bad situations. So anyway then if this were to happen, then maybe the government and other people would wake up to the idea that this technology should be looked into a lot harder than it presently is. If the FDA would focus its efforts into researching this technology and not focus so much in the drug industry then maybe many of the diseases which currently aflict our country and the world could be cured. Josh , rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for >>>>> hooking up to a >>>>> > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. >>>>> > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some >>>>> > chepo >>>>> > rife >>>>> > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how >>>>> about just >>>>> > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be >>>>> > slightly >>>>> > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that >>>>> > matter? >>>>> > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also >>>>> > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? >>>>> > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously >>>>> > driving >>>>> > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & >>>>> > also >>>>> > triggering a plasma ball? >>>>> > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed >>>>> > speakers >>>>> > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that >>>>> > do >>>>> > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? >>>>> > ...adding >>>>> > in the plasma ball to all? >>>>> > >>>>> > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several >>>>> > ways >>>>> > from >>>>> > available sources. >>>>> > >>>>> > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only >>>>> designed to >>>>> > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic >>>>> Research titanium >>>>> > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical >>>>> output from >>>>> > my >>>>> > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the >>>>> usual 20 khz >>>>> > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does >>>>> frex16 do freqs >>>>> > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a >>>>> few freqs >>>>> > on >>>>> > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more >>>>> expensive >>>>> > machines. >>>>> > >>>>> > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for >>>>> electronics >>>>> > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. >>>>> if i get a >>>>> > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz >>>>> somehow might i >>>>> > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various >>>>> arrangements >>>>> > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd >>>>> like to have a >>>>> > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to >>>>> > me. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2006 Report Share Posted October 25, 2006 Josh, It is not about healing people, it is all about MONEY! The FDA is paid in part by " grants " from big pharma. Where do you think their inspectors come from? Certainly you don't believe the come off the street; they come from BIG PHARMA. They inspect and regulate the very companies that " donated their services to the FDA. " According to the regulations established in 1911, only pharacuticals (DRUGS) can " cure " disease. PERIOD. Example: Everyone knows that scurvy can be " cured " with an intake of ascorbic acid. Been that way for hundreds of years. That is why fruit was such a valuable commodity to sailors, assuming they wanted to keep their teeth and lives. If you were to go out on the street corner today, hold up an orange and make the following statement, " This orange can CURE scurvy, " you would be in violation of three different FDA regulations which in theory could not only land you in jail for up to 14 years, but cost you $10,000 in fines and court fees. Does that sound like a group eager to heal people or make MONEY? Regards, Bruce Guilmette, PhD Survive Cancer Foundation, Inc. http://survivecancerfoundation.org <http://survivecancerfoundation.org/> Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own. Matt 6:34 (NIV) _____ From: Rife [mailto:Rife ] On Behalf Of Josh Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 10:31 AM To: Rife Subject: Re: rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... You know, it may not be nice to say this...But maybe what the United states needs sometime soon is some kind of virus to get out. And no matter what the FDA tries and the drug industry tries there will be no drugs can can cure or even affect the virus in any way. I'm talking about a fast acting virus...Would it be a bad thing if people start dying off? yes it would. But sometimes good things can come from bad situations. So anyway then if this were to happen, then maybe the government and other people would wake up to the idea that this technology should be looked into a lot harder than it presently is. If the FDA would focus its efforts into researching this technology and not focus so much in the drug industry then maybe many of the diseases which currently aflict our country and the world could be cured. Josh , rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for >>>>> hooking up to a >>>>> > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. >>>>> > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some >>>>> > chepo >>>>> > rife >>>>> > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how >>>>> about just >>>>> > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be >>>>> > slightly >>>>> > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that >>>>> > matter? >>>>> > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also >>>>> > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? >>>>> > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers simultaneously >>>>> > driving >>>>> > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & >>>>> > also >>>>> > triggering a plasma ball? >>>>> > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed >>>>> > speakers >>>>> > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that >>>>> > do >>>>> > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? >>>>> > ...adding >>>>> > in the plasma ball to all? >>>>> > >>>>> > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several >>>>> > ways >>>>> > from >>>>> > available sources. >>>>> > >>>>> > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only >>>>> designed to >>>>> > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic >>>>> Research titanium >>>>> > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical >>>>> output from >>>>> > my >>>>> > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the >>>>> usual 20 khz >>>>> > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does >>>>> frex16 do freqs >>>>> > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a >>>>> few freqs >>>>> > on >>>>> > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more >>>>> expensive >>>>> > machines. >>>>> > >>>>> > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for >>>>> electronics >>>>> > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. >>>>> if i get a >>>>> > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz >>>>> somehow might i >>>>> > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various >>>>> arrangements >>>>> > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd >>>>> like to have a >>>>> > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to >>>>> > me. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2006 Report Share Posted October 25, 2006 Hi, Regarding ‘Thunderball’ type of Rife-like emitter. The recommended (?) method is to have the signal input to the base of the output/HV generating transistor, which itself is run by the output from a 555 chip, in oscillation mode at a low ultrasonic frequency ( I have yet to measure this, but probably around 30-40KHz). The rife input frequency then modulates this oscillation frequency which translates to the plasma bulb. However, this system would only work satisfactorily at audio frequencies, if for no other reason that the HV transformer would act as a filter at frequencies much higher than the 30-40 KHz at which it normally operates. This not to say that some fairly sophisticated electronics could not be devised in which the oscillation frequency carries Rife signals at higher frequencies than itself. The modus operandi of Aubrey Scoon’s experimental device should provide some ideas as to how this might be achieved. Regards, Andy ---------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release Date: 18/10/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2006 Report Share Posted October 25, 2006 Rife therapy and many others for that matter.But one must think outside of the box so to speak. That this will come to pass,I have no doubt.It is just a matter of time now.The inetrnet has been and is a geat tool for the spread of information. Regards to all group members. Guy Josh wrote: > You know, it may not be nice to say this...But maybe what the United > states > needs sometime soon is some kind of virus to get out. And no matter > what the > FDA tries and the drug industry tries there will be no drugs can can > cure or > even affect the virus in any way. I'm talking about a fast acting > virus...Would it be a bad thing if people start dying off? yes it > would. But > sometimes good things can come from bad situations. So anyway then if > this > were to happen, then maybe the government and other people would wake > up to > the idea that this technology should be looked into a lot harder than it > presently is. If the FDA would focus its efforts into researching this > technology and not focus so much in the drug industry then maybe many > of the > diseases which currently aflict our country and the world could be cured. > > Josh > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2006 Report Share Posted October 25, 2006 It sounds like a making money scheme to me. Why doesn't the FDA just start spamming people like all the others do if they want money? And it also sounds like a scam. If people would eat propperly and take care of themselves better for a start a lot of the problems would be solved. So then also, if the FDA is so entrenched in our society and has such a hold on it, then: what will it take to to switch our society from a drug-laden society to one which uses nutrition, rife technology, and naturopathic medicine to heal as opposed to drugs? And I wonder if it will ever happen? Or will we be stuck in a society ruled by the drug companies forever? Josh rife on the cheap...again, compounding ideas.... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > ...i've been looking at Kin's site & the instructions for >>>>>> hooking up to a >>>>>> > plasma ball. i've come up with some ideas & questions. >>>>>> > since the ball has a mic so it already responds to sound, & some >>>>>> > chepo >>>>>> > rife >>>>>> > systems hookup to a stereo or or whatever for audio output, how >>>>>> about just >>>>>> > letting the ball be triggered by audio from speakers. they might be >>>>>> > slightly >>>>>> > out of phase due to the circuit driving the ball ...would that >>>>>> > matter? >>>>>> > a high power stereo driving hand held electrodes design is also >>>>>> > promoted/sold here & there...do these do anything really? >>>>>> > how about an amp that will drive two sets of speakers >>>>>> > simultaneously >>>>>> > driving >>>>>> > one set of speakers & one set of contact electrodes of some sort & >>>>>> > also >>>>>> > triggering a plasma ball? >>>>>> > how about wrapping one's hand around the backside of exposed >>>>>> > speakers >>>>>> > magnets, where the magnetic fields penetrate the hands - would that >>>>>> > do >>>>>> > anything at all? maybe with the feet on a ground plate electrode? >>>>>> > ...adding >>>>>> > in the plasma ball to all? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > thinking about maximizing the absorbed energy to a max in several >>>>>> > ways >>>>>> > from >>>>>> > available sources. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > i've seen freqs on lists above 30 khz. most stereo amps only >>>>>> designed to >>>>>> > about 20 khz, but some can go way up there & my Acoustic >>>>>> Research titanium >>>>>> > tweeters respond according to ratings to 44 khz. the optical >>>>>> output from >>>>>> > my >>>>>> > high-end computer audio gear just might output well over the >>>>>> usual 20 khz >>>>>> > (have to check the specs) if driven by software to. does >>>>>> frex16 do freqs >>>>>> > beyond the audio range? like 30 khz ? i haven't noticed but a >>>>>> few freqs >>>>>> > on >>>>>> > lists beyond 20 khz, & i suppose they're basically for the more >>>>>> expensive >>>>>> > machines. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > i have both audio & rf generators, old ones - not digital, for >>>>>> electronics >>>>>> > bench use, & a good HP dual trace scope, but no freq counter. >>>>>> if i get a >>>>>> > digital freq counter & an amp that will do 0 - say 45 khz >>>>>> somehow might i >>>>>> > have a pretty kick-ass machine when connected to the various >>>>>> arrangements >>>>>> > described above with no computer/software involvement? i'd >>>>>> like to have a >>>>>> > freq counter for bench use anyway, & these seem like good ideas to >>>>>> > me. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.