Re: Ergonom Microscope talk at the Rife Conference

[Guest guest]

Hi Lee,

I am not sure I said it exceeds the resolution (it may do, but I

have not seen any reliable data on the resolution of the Rife

microscope to compare it with), however the Ergonom can resolve

better than 100nm in natural colours, with variable depth of focus,

etc. is considerably easier to use and is available commercially.

It is possible to stain with light as Rife did it, this is actually

demonstrated in the Symbiosis or Parasitism film that can be watched

online in the video section of the Grayfield Optical web site.

http://www.grayfieldoptical.com/pg036.html

However, it is not necessary to stain organisms at all under the

Ergonom microscope. The Grayfield contrast method provides so much

contrast, under white light, that staining is not required, unlike

other microscopes.

The fact that we have a working distance (WD - the distance between

the bottom of the lens and sample) of 1-3mm (other light microscopes

have a considerable smaller WD) enables us to grow cultures in a

special heated glass chamber and observe them over months if

necessary. As we are are using white light, no harm is done to the

culture and it can be observed in its natural living state.

http://www.grayfieldoptical.com/pg033.html

We also have a special chamber which allows frequency therapy

experiments to be performed (via two wires into the chamber).

I have not yet released my video recording of my talk on the

microscope online, yet (still in the editing phase). I will announce

it here when it is finished.

Regards

http://www.grayfieldoptical.com

>

> , you said at the conference that your microscope actually

exceeds

> Royal Rife's microscope in resolution. What about the fluorescing

or

> whatever Rife called it when a particular freq of the light source

> luminesced the organism with it's characteristic color. Does your

microscope

> do anything like that? It seemed to me that was his scope's most

valuable

> trait. And if your scope does not do that, how can you stain live

organisms

> without killing them? I am only asking not criticizing. The beauty

of your

> scope is its price and ease of use. All my love, lee

>

[Guest guest]

, When searching for something as small as the bx or by virus, how does

one find it without the characteristic color staining that Rife's microscope

had? Have you actually seen this[these] viru[es]? I thought Rife said there

was only one virus that causes cancer. Is it in fact two?

[Guest guest]

Hi Lee,

Kurt Olbrich and Bernd Muschlien have about 30 years of experience

using the Ergonom microscope to view cancer amongst other things. I

have not personally used the microscope to look at the cancer virus

(yet) so I can only pass on what I have been told so do not take

what I say here as absolute. There is an excellent film which does

discuss this topic to a certain extent: Symbiosis or Parasitism

http://www.grayfieldoptical.com/pg036.html

Kurt has even made detailed drawings of the cancer causing virus

along with its various pleomorphic phases.

http://www.grayfieldoptical.com/olbrich-all.pdf pages 7-10

(description is in German).

When I talk to Kurt about the cancer virus, he tells me it has many

different states according to its environment and he has defined 5

different states of this organism.

Once you are familiar with observing the various organisms through a

powerful microscope, it becomes easier to identify them through

their shape, colour and behaviour. Do you need a special stain to

identify an apple in a fruit bowl? If you only had a fuzzy black and

white picture, then something to make the apple stand out against

say pears would be useful, with a clear colour image, you can easily

recognise it once you know what apples look like. It is a similar

case with microscopes, beyond a certain magnification, normal light

microscopes provide an image with little or no colour and lacking in

detail and contrast, that is where staining is important.

Regards

>

> , When searching for something as small as the bx or by

virus, how does

> one find it without the characteristic color staining that Rife's

microscope

> had? Have you actually seen this[these] viru[es]? I thought Rife

said there

> was only one virus that causes cancer. Is it in fact two?

>

[Guest guest]

--- wrote:

> Hi Lee,

> I am not sure I said it exceeds the resolution (it

> may do, but I

> have not seen any reliable data on the resolution of

> the Rife

> microscope to compare it with), however the Ergonom

> can resolve

> better than 100nm in natural colours, with variable

> depth of focus,

<snip>

There is indication that Rife was able to see the

yellow fever virus, which is 40-60 nm in diameter.

Professor Hubbard also said that the resolution

apparent in the photomicrograph of the tetanus spore

was on the order of 44 angstroms.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

We do not quote resolution figures better than 100nm because 100nm is

already an extremely high resolution and to quote more just makes us appear

unbelievable. It is always better to understate. The reason Rife has a bad

name amongst many optical engineers is because of these high resolution

claims and only a few images to back them up.

For example, most cars cannot drive much faster than say 100mph and this is

a value everybody recognises (forget the speed limits for the sake of this

argument, some German motorways do not have speed limits, anyway).

If I was to come and say I have a new car that has a top speed of 150mph,

you would probably think something like " that is fast, lets give it a spin " .

If I were to say it drove 500mph, you would reject it out of hand and say

that’s impossible.

There is a similar problem with optical microscopes. Nearly all optical

light microscopes cannot resolve below 150nm and that is pushing it. When we

quote 100nm, that sounds to a microscope engineer like 200mph, imagine what

they would think if we were to start saying numbers like say 30nm, they

would say that’s more than impossible. If a customer buys a microscope

thinking he is getting 100nm resolution and discovers its actually better,

no problem.

As regards the size of viruses, where do you get this data from. Kurt

Olbrich has often said that the published sizes of viruses are often way

out.

Under an electron microscope, viruses not only die, they also shrivel up

like a fist — so what you see is not what viruses normally look like. For

example, textbooks teach that the HIV virus is about 30 to 40 nanometers,

because that is the size as seen under the electron microscope. But in

reality, such viruses can grow to nearly 300 nanometers when seen in their

living state — a fact established during a trial in Berlin using the Ergonom

microscopes. Most people do not know, either, that viruses do not have a

fixed size. They are smaller when young and larger when full size; and this

effects their resonance frequency too.

That is why you have to be very careful when claiming that a yellow fever

virus is 40-60nm in size. In its living state, it is probably larger than

that.

As to giving exact measurements in angstroms, do you realize how small that

is? Be wary of anybody who quotes such small sizes as the likelihood of

inaccuracies at such sizes is extreme.

For those who are not familiar with such sizes, 1 angstrom is 0.1 nanometer.

A hydrogen atom is said to be 0.5 angstroms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%85ngstr%C3%B6m

There are 1000 nanometers in a micrometer (µm) and a 1000 micrometers in a

milimeter (mm). There are 25.4 mm in 1 inch (for those not familiar with

metric numbers).

In other words, if your 44 angstroms were enlarged to the size of a mm, then

a mm would be 440 kilometers (273 miles) long on the same scale.

I suggest you have a look at the following website which tries to understand

and explain the Rife microscope:

http://www.xenophilia.com/zb/zb0012a.htm

Regards

http://www.grayfieldoptical.com

Re: Ergonom Microscope talk at the Rife Conference

--- wrote:

> Hi Lee,

> I am not sure I said it exceeds the resolution (it

> may do, but I

> have not seen any reliable data on the resolution of

> the Rife

> microscope to compare it with), however the Ergonom

> can resolve

> better than 100nm in natural colours, with variable

> depth of focus,

<snip>

There is indication that Rife was able to see the

yellow fever virus, which is 40-60 nm in diameter.

Professor Hubbard also said that the resolution

apparent in the photomicrograph of the tetanus spore

was on the order of 44 angstroms.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

I love reading your messages. Always full of interesting information.

When you say a virus resonance will change as it grows, this must mean its

resonance signature is based on mass, is this correct ?

Regards,

Ken

Re: Ergonom Microscope talk at the Rife Conference

--- wrote:

> Hi Lee,

> I am not sure I said it exceeds the resolution (it

> may do, but I

> have not seen any reliable data on the resolution of

> the Rife

> microscope to compare it with), however the Ergonom

> can resolve

> better than 100nm in natural colours, with variable

> depth of focus,

<snip>

There is indication that Rife was able to see the

yellow fever virus, which is 40-60 nm in diameter.

Professor Hubbard also said that the resolution

apparent in the photomicrograph of the tetanus spore

was on the order of 44 angstroms.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Hi Ken,

Kurt Olbrich imaged the AIDS/HIV virus some time ago (1986) and it

was discovered that the virus grows and changes its colour from blue

to red as it does so. This certainly suggests that the resonance

frequency is based on mass or size.

I have found that varying the resonance frequency used to +/- 1 or 2%

helps to catch the various sizes of the same pathogen.

Regards

>

> > Hi Lee,

> > I am not sure I said it exceeds the resolution (it

> > may do, but I

> > have not seen any reliable data on the resolution of

> > the Rife

> > microscope to compare it with), however the Ergonom

> > can resolve

> > better than 100nm in natural colours, with variable

> > depth of focus,

> <snip>

>

>

> There is indication that Rife was able to see the

> yellow fever virus, which is 40-60 nm in diameter.

> Professor Hubbard also said that the resolution

> apparent in the photomicrograph of the tetanus spore

> was on the order of 44 angstroms.

>

> Regards,

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

Thanks for this, it is a clear demonstration why we don't get all the

citters at once as it has been discussed numerous times before by the

morphing and changing of microbes is their only way to escape the

devitalization effect of being resonated.

A friend several weeks back had a nasty HSV outbreak on her arm, and

frequencies across the bandwidth of 630Hz to 690Hz caused strong reactions

in her arm, just below the elbow where the worst outbreak was. I could see

the muscles twitching just in the outbreak spots. The feeling my friend

reported was a strong tingling sensation up and down her arm, she perspired

more and was excited by this reaction in her sore arm. She said the pain in

her arm turned into a heat feeling, and the pain went within half a minute

after 664 was transmitted.

We ran the CAFL HSV 322, 476, 589, 664, 785, 822, 895, 944, 1043,

1614, 2062, 1489, 2950 and 664 was the frequency that caused this

delightful reaction, it was right in the middle of a 8Hz reaction band

width. I explored frequecies from 630Hz to 690Hz and there were on and off

" hit " spots over this band width.

This response looked like it was a reaction to the herpes virus when in

" outbreak mode " , or the inflammation and diseased cells/toxins in her arm as

a result the HSV outbreak. We met a few times over a few weeks, and the last

response she had was from 785, when 664 didn't produce responses anymore, it

was like 785 was cleaning up what 664 (and exploring) achieved.

Her arm normalised within these few weeks and she is delighted.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

Re: Ergonom Microscope talk at the Rife Conference

Hi Ken,

Kurt Olbrich imaged the AIDS/HIV virus some time ago (1986) and it

was discovered that the virus grows and changes its colour from blue

to red as it does so. This certainly suggests that the resonance

frequency is based on mass or size.

I have found that varying the resonance frequency used to +/- 1 or 2%

helps to catch the various sizes of the same pathogen.

Regards

>

> > Hi Lee,

> > I am not sure I said it exceeds the resolution (it

> > may do, but I

> > have not seen any reliable data on the resolution of

> > the Rife

> > microscope to compare it with), however the Ergonom

> > can resolve

> > better than 100nm in natural colours, with variable

> > depth of focus,

> <snip>

>

>

> There is indication that Rife was able to see the

> yellow fever virus, which is 40-60 nm in diameter.

> Professor Hubbard also said that the resolution

> apparent in the photomicrograph of the tetanus spore

> was on the order of 44 angstroms.

>

> Regards,

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Ken,

Please tell us which device you had used on her? Such as was it a

plasma tube, RF carrier being modulated, etc.

>

> Hi ,

>

> Thanks for this, it is a clear demonstration why we don't get all

the

> citters at once as it has been discussed numerous times before by

the

> morphing and changing of microbes is their only way to escape the

> devitalization effect of being resonated.

>

> A friend several weeks back had a nasty HSV outbreak on her arm,

and

> frequencies across the bandwidth of 630Hz to 690Hz caused strong

reactions

> in her arm, just below the elbow where the worst outbreak was. I

could see

> the muscles twitching just in the outbreak spots. The feeling my

friend

> reported was a strong tingling sensation up and down her arm, she

perspired

> more and was excited by this reaction in her sore arm. She said the

pain in

> her arm turned into a heat feeling, and the pain went within half a

minute

> after 664 was transmitted.

>

> We ran the CAFL HSV 322, 476, 589, 664, 785, 822, 895, 944,

1043,

> 1614, 2062, 1489, 2950 and 664 was the frequency that caused

this

> delightful reaction, it was right in the middle of a 8Hz reaction

band

> width. I explored frequecies from 630Hz to 690Hz and there were on

and off

> " hit " spots over this band width.

>

> This response looked like it was a reaction to the herpes virus

when in

> " outbreak mode " , or the inflammation and diseased cells/toxins in

her arm as

> a result the HSV outbreak. We met a few times over a few weeks, and

the last

> response she had was from 785, when 664 didn't produce responses

anymore, it

> was like 785 was cleaning up what 664 (and exploring) achieved.

>

> Her arm normalised within these few weeks and she is delighted.

>

> Regards,

> Ken Uzzell

>

>

> Re: Ergonom Microscope talk at the Rife Conference

>

>

> Hi Ken,

> Kurt Olbrich imaged the AIDS/HIV virus some time ago (1986) and it

> was discovered that the virus grows and changes its colour from blue

> to red as it does so. This certainly suggests that the resonance

> frequency is based on mass or size.

>

> I have found that varying the resonance frequency used to +/- 1 or

2%

> helps to catch the various sizes of the same pathogen.

>

> Regards

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

Sorry for the late reply.

I used an 8 inch novelty Thunder Ball transmitter. The Audio is modulated

with a variable RF carrier. I had the RF carrier set to around 50kHz. My

friends arm was about 18 inches from the plasma ball.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

FreX - CHIamp - FDS

Re: Ergonom Microscope talk at the Rife Conference

> Hi Ken,

>

> Please tell us which device you had used on her? Such as was it a

> plasma tube, RF carrier being modulated, etc.

>

>

>

>

>>

>> Hi ,

>>

>> Thanks for this, it is a clear demonstration why we don't get all

> the

>> citters at once as it has been discussed numerous times before by

> the

>> morphing and changing of microbes is their only way to escape the

>> devitalization effect of being resonated.

>>

>> A friend several weeks back had a nasty HSV outbreak on her arm,

> and

>> frequencies across the bandwidth of 630Hz to 690Hz caused strong

> reactions

>> in her arm, just below the elbow where the worst outbreak was. I

> could see

>> the muscles twitching just in the outbreak spots. The feeling my

> friend

>> reported was a strong tingling sensation up and down her arm, she

> perspired

>> more and was excited by this reaction in her sore arm. She said the

> pain in

>> her arm turned into a heat feeling, and the pain went within half a

> minute

>> after 664 was transmitted.

>>

>> We ran the CAFL HSV 322, 476, 589, 664, 785, 822, 895, 944,

> 1043,

>> 1614, 2062, 1489, 2950 and 664 was the frequency that caused

> this

>> delightful reaction, it was right in the middle of a 8Hz reaction

> band

>> width. I explored frequecies from 630Hz to 690Hz and there were on

> and off

>> " hit " spots over this band width.

>>

>> This response looked like it was a reaction to the herpes virus

> when in

>> " outbreak mode " , or the inflammation and diseased cells/toxins in

> her arm as

>> a result the HSV outbreak. We met a few times over a few weeks, and

> the last

>> response she had was from 785, when 664 didn't produce responses

> anymore, it

>> was like 785 was cleaning up what 664 (and exploring) achieved.

>>

>> Her arm normalised within these few weeks and she is delighted.

>>

>> Regards,

>> Ken Uzzell