RE: Doug at the Rife Conference

[Guest guest]

What is the significance of determining frequencies with a microscope?

Tom

>

>Reply-To: Rife

>To: <Lyme-and-rife >

>Subject: Doug at the Rife Conference

>Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:12:03 -0700

>

>We have tried for years to get the inventor of the " Doug " coil device to

>speak at the Rife Conference.

>

> Rosner has arranged for this to happen. Doug will be there and will

>speak along with .

>Doug is the only one that I know of in modern times to determine

>frequencies with a microscope.

>

> Loyd

>http://www.royalrife.com

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Determining frequencies with a microscope is

fundamentally what Rife research is all about. There

is no Rife research without a microscope.

Regards,

--- Tom Wasinger wrote:

> What is the significance of determining frequencies

> with a microscope?

>

> Tom

[Guest guest]

Hi Tom and ,

As I am one of the very few people here with access to an optical microscope

of similar capabilities (Ergonom) to the microscope Rife used, I would agree

that the use of a microscope to determine the correct frequencies (MOR) to

use and to be able to judge the effectiveness of the treatment is very

useful. I would not go as far as to say that there is " no " Rife research

without a microscope, though.

I will discuss this issue more during my talk at the Rife Conference so I

hope many of you can attend.

Regards

http://www.grayfieldoptical.com

RE: Doug at the Rife Conference

Determining frequencies with a microscope is

fundamentally what Rife research is all about. There

is no Rife research without a microscope.

Regards,

--- Tom Wasinger wrote:

> What is the significance of determining frequencies

> with a microscope?

>

> Tom

[Guest guest]

--- wrote:

> Hi Tom and ,

> As I am one of the very few people here with access

> to an optical microscope

> of similar capabilities (Ergonom) to the microscope

> Rife used, I would agree

> that the use of a microscope to determine the

> correct frequencies (MOR) to

> use and to be able to judge the effectiveness of the

> treatment is very

> useful. I would not go as far as to say that there

> is " no " Rife research

> without a microscope, though.

>

As I've said many times before, advanced microscopes

such as the Ergonom or Rife are only needed to work on

the virus-sized organisms. Regular microscopes are

fine for bacteria and other larger organisms. Also,

when I say " Rife " , I mean it in its proper usage, and

I stand by my statement. Other frequency therapy

research can be conducted without a microscope, but it

is essential for " Rife " research.

> I will discuss this issue more during my talk at the

> Rife Conference so I

> hope many of you can attend.

>

Could you post a summary on the list? I wont be able

to attend this year.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

It depends on what one means by " Rife research. " has always defined Rife

research as involving a microscope because that is what Rife used.

One could also argue that Rife research nust make use of a radio frequency

plasma device such as Rife used. With that definition, Doug did not do Rife

research.

I personally would call it Rife research if a person was trying to stop the

growth of mold in a dish using a pulsed electromagnet and no scope.

http://www.royalrife.com

RE: Doug at the Rife Conference

Determining frequencies with a microscope is

fundamentally what Rife research is all about. There

is no Rife research without a microscope.

Regards,

--- Tom Wasinger wrote:

> What is the significance of determining frequencies

> with a microscope?

>

> Tom

[Guest guest]

,

You will be very much missed. I have asked the speakers for powerpoint and/or

papers that I could make available.

http://www.royalrife.com

RE: Doug at the Rife Conference

--- wrote:

> Hi Tom and ,

> As I am one of the very few people here with access

> to an optical microscope

> of similar capabilities (Ergonom) to the microscope

> Rife used, I would agree

> that the use of a microscope to determine the

> correct frequencies (MOR) to

> use and to be able to judge the effectiveness of the

> treatment is very

> useful. I would not go as far as to say that there

> is " no " Rife research

> without a microscope, though.

>

As I've said many times before, advanced microscopes

such as the Ergonom or Rife are only needed to work on

the virus-sized organisms. Regular microscopes are

fine for bacteria and other larger organisms. Also,

when I say " Rife " , I mean it in its proper usage, and

I stand by my statement. Other frequency therapy

research can be conducted without a microscope, but it

is essential for " Rife " research.

> I will discuss this issue more during my talk at the

> Rife Conference so I

> hope many of you can attend.

>

Could you post a summary on the list? I wont be able

to attend this year.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

--- Loyd wrote:

> It depends on what one means by " Rife research. "

> has always defined Rife research as involving

> a microscope because that is what Rife used.

>

It's not only because that is what Rife used, but

because it's the only way to objectively and

conclusively demonstrate and confirm the MOR effect.

> One could also argue that Rife research nust make

> use of a radio frequency plasma device such as Rife

> used. With that definition, Doug did not do Rife

> research.

>

Rife wasn't particularly hung up on the specific

hardware. If it could produce the MOR effect, he

probably would have accepted it. The one possible

objection that I can think of regarding the Doug

device is the potential danger in using such high

power. Rife used relatively low power, giving a much

larger margin of safety.

> I personally would call it Rife research if a person

> was trying to stop the growth of mold in a dish

> using a pulsed electromagnet and no scope.

>

You could theoretically test frequencies without a

microscope, but it would be so extremely inefficient

as to make it practically impossible. It's hard

enough with a microscope. Without one, you could only

test one frequency per experiment, because otherwise

you wouldn't be able to tell which frequency did the

job. With a microscope you can step through a series

of frequencies and objectively monitor what's

happening throughout.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Thanks. I never thought I would ever miss a

conference, but present circumstances have dictated my

absence.

Regards,

--- Loyd wrote:

> ,

> You will be very much missed. I have asked the

> speakers for powerpoint and/or papers that I could

> make available.

>

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

As regards observing virus sized organisms, I fully agree with you.

Sorry to hear you are not attending the conference. I am still working on my

presentation and I have no intention of releasing anything on this group

before the conference as I am sure you can understand. I do have some

interesting material, though.

Will , or anyone else from the Canadian group be attending?

Regards

RE: Doug at the Rife Conference

--- wrote:

> Hi Tom and ,

> As I am one of the very few people here with access

> to an optical microscope

> of similar capabilities (Ergonom) to the microscope

> Rife used, I would agree

> that the use of a microscope to determine the

> correct frequencies (MOR) to

> use and to be able to judge the effectiveness of the treatment is very

> useful. I would not go as far as to say that there

> is " no " Rife research

> without a microscope, though.

>

As I've said many times before, advanced microscopes

such as the Ergonom or Rife are only needed to work on

the virus-sized organisms. Regular microscopes are

fine for bacteria and other larger organisms. Also,

when I say " Rife " , I mean it in its proper usage, and

I stand by my statement. Other frequency therapy

research can be conducted without a microscope, but it

is essential for " Rife " research.

> I will discuss this issue more during my talk at the

> Rife Conference so I

> hope many of you can attend.

>

Could you post a summary on the list? I wont be able

to attend this year.

Regards,