Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 The fish may stink from the head down, but talking about how a fish smells won't kill it. Only taking out a filet knife and poking it will cause it any pain. While the conspiracy theorists might even be right about this one, the fact remains that 10 years from now the conspiracy theorists will be making posts on internet sites where only a few people are listening while future kids are given a life sentence. Change requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now this is what the opponents are giving us. We would be remiss to stand by and do nothing because it is not exactly what we want. For our children's sake we must take advantage of every opportunity we get because all it takes for evil to thrive in this world is for good people to do nothing... - Just my 2 cents... Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of fareastphillips Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:18 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: OT: A commentary on CAA October 31, 2006 An opinion/commentary by M. The Fish Stinks from the Head Down A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top - the hospital Administrator - who was really at fault. Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the way. In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill did not go far enough to address provisions for researching environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, something fishy going on here. Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years to sort out. Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery upon misery. So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the scenes to discuss his next career move? I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias - former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were all so obviously bamboozled. I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, AMA - the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders have rendered our children sick and silent. Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise coming from many of these parents and from many national autism organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get on with the important work of curing autism. But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the head down. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Here here! And once again THANK YOU to all you GOOD PEOPLE who did SOMETHING very big! In taking a stand! " There is one thing greater than all the armies in the world --- an idea whose time has come! " Yes - the fish stinks ~ reeks horribly - and it is most definately time to filet! Thank you one and all who participated in person - with phone calls - and most importantly - with your prayers! Guppy Mike Bernoski wrote: The fish may stink from the head down, but talking about how a fish smells won't kill it. Only taking out a filet knife and poking it will cause it any pain. While the conspiracy theorists might even be right about this one, the fact remains that 10 years from now the conspiracy theorists will be making posts on internet sites where only a few people are listening while future kids are given a life sentence. Change requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now this is what the opponents are giving us. We would be remiss to stand by and do nothing because it is not exactly what we want. For our children's sake we must take advantage of every opportunity we get because all it takes for evil to thrive in this world is for good people to do nothing... - Just my 2 cents... Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of fareastphillips Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:18 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: OT: A commentary on CAA October 31, 2006 An opinion/commentary by M. The Fish Stinks from the Head Down A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top - the hospital Administrator - who was really at fault. Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the way. In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill did not go far enough to address provisions for researching environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, something fishy going on here. Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years to sort out. Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery upon misery. So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the scenes to discuss his next career move? I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias - former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were all so obviously bamboozled. I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, AMA - the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders have rendered our children sick and silent. Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise coming from many of these parents and from many national autism organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get on with the important work of curing autism. But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the head down. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 - I could not agree with you more...BUT I think we have to have a multipronged attack and use whatever resources are available to us - we can not get to the top at this moment and, yes, I agree Joe Barton is just the fall guy in all this - and he will land on a big fat pharma cushion when it is all over - but we need to make noise and alot of it. That is why we seized the opportunity when Hastert came to Dallas. It was like the planets were alligned for once on Autisms behalf in a small way - Hastert did not come here for - this was a conscious political maneuver to enhance his image in light of the Foley scandal and I think we played a small part in diffusing that...Hastert gets us much further up the spine of the stinking fish and he has far more power that little ole Joe ... we just need to be more visible and vocal and get them where we can and we can not give up --- we need to use the blogosphere - that is so available to us and out of there control and we need to be inundating it with what is happening in a determined and reasoned way -- the reality,unfortunately is, unless you are touched by autism in someway, you just do not get it and you just do not care. After all, you can not catch it -- so you do not have that same empathetic fear factor you have with cancer etc...it can still affect me so I need to think about this! We need to show these people why they should care: Autism is and epidemic and it is a national emergency..and if they fear social security being unavailable -- then they need to think about this too... We need to passionately but reasonably engage the nation in a dialogue about this by using all the resources available to us...and it has to be US because we can not rely on the Autism Community at the top - they are well-intentioned, but far too fractured - that they are essentially inert... just my thoughts - sorry not as eloquent but I have my four year old tugging at my leg and my heartstrings..mara fareastphillips wrote: October 31, 2006 An opinion/commentary by M. The Fish Stinks from the Head Down A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top – the hospital Administrator – who was really at fault. Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the way. In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill did not go far enough to address provisions for researching environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, something fishy going on here. Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years to sort out. Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery upon misery. So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the scenes to discuss his next career move? I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias – former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were all so obviously bamboozled. I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, AMA – the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders have rendered our children sick and silent. Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise coming from many of these parents and from many national autism organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get on with the important work of curing autism. But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the head down. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Just got the call, Imus is going to have me on at 6:29 EST tommorow... Got some prepping to do... I am also going to have to give back last weeks salary to my employer! Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of M. Guppy Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:33 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: RE: OT: A commentary on CAA Here here! And once again THANK YOU to all you GOOD PEOPLE who did SOMETHING very big! In taking a stand! " There is one thing greater than all the armies in the world --- an idea whose time has come! " Yes - the fish stinks ~ reeks horribly - and it is most definately time to filet! Thank you one and all who participated in person - with phone calls - and most importantly - with your prayers! Guppy Mike Bernoski <mike.bernoski@... <mailto:mike.bernoski%40sekureconnekt.com> > wrote: The fish may stink from the head down, but talking about how a fish smells won't kill it. Only taking out a filet knife and poking it will cause it any pain. While the conspiracy theorists might even be right about this one, the fact remains that 10 years from now the conspiracy theorists will be making posts on internet sites where only a few people are listening while future kids are given a life sentence. Change requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now this is what the opponents are giving us. We would be remiss to stand by and do nothing because it is not exactly what we want. For our children's sake we must take advantage of every opportunity we get because all it takes for evil to thrive in this world is for good people to do nothing... - Just my 2 cents... Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of fareastphillips Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:18 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: OT: A commentary on CAA October 31, 2006 An opinion/commentary by M. The Fish Stinks from the Head Down A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top - the hospital Administrator - who was really at fault. Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the way. In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill did not go far enough to address provisions for researching environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, something fishy going on here. Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years to sort out. Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery upon misery. So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the scenes to discuss his next career move? I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias - former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were all so obviously bamboozled. I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, AMA - the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders have rendered our children sick and silent. Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise coming from many of these parents and from many national autism organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get on with the important work of curing autism. But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the head down. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Just to clarify, I fully support and greatly appreciate the efforts made at the rally. I was extremely dismayed that I could not attend, so my dh said, " well, write a letter " and this is what came out, more or less unedited and from the heart. It doesn't mean I don't believe in action, or that I believe putting pressure on Barton and Hastert is wasted time. Everything we do is on the way to getting there. I'm just trying to get people to think about how this all came to pass one week before mid-terms. I don't believe it was an accident at all. I'm not just sitting at home pontificating -- I'm doing what I can with the small resources (especially time) that I have. This includes contacting my school district's environmental department to ask why they are allowing mercury-laden flu shots to be dispensed in the schools, and talking to the school nurse about why my son is sick, and responding to ACHAMP and UA and (fill in the blank) action alerts, presentating talks on autism and physiology, and mentoring parents who might benefit from my knowledge about biomed, and MORE. All of us involved in the autism movement can do things, however small, to help those beyond our our home in some way. One more point -- this is not meant to be an anti-Republican tirade. I believe Bush inherited this problem, he didn't create it. During the Clinton administration, when the decision was made to " phase out " thimerosal from vaccines, Clinton OKd a purchase ($40 million if memory serves?) to get some of these bad vacs off the shelf and send them to third world countries. Nice. Now, to get ready for Halloween. Regards and thanks, > October 31, 2006 > An opinion/commentary by M. > > The Fish Stinks from the Head Down > > A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a > friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, > she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. > Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial > performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- > all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, > who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top – the hospital > Administrator – who was really at fault. > > Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the > Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations > across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to > help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. > After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the > bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the > way. > > In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill > did not go far enough to address provisions for researching > environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. > Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the > bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under > sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of > errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. > > Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating > environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill > with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the > Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from > the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could > be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, > something fishy going on here. > > Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we > want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks > any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, > does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years > to sort out. > > Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of > children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. > As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has > blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where > passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House > Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, > the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter > broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery > upon misery. > > So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week > away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because > the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our > Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their > vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame > Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good > guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. > > Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's > planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy > and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who > hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate > corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post > in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers > of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug > manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . > Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the > scenes to discuss his next career move? > > I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's > the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart > enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, > mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after > all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. > > You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the > White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush > administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was > W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the > Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now > Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and > Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias – > former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush > administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and > the Caribbean. > > Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- > industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and > Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid > the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major > drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is > now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then > there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided > over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a > favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. > > Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more > than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know > if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money > won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol > Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which > pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " > > So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling > place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its > wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were > all so obviously bamboozled. > > I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't > understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund > the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to > once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would > have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for > years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. > > I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical > rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you > that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what > has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up > followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, > AMA – the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders > have rendered our children sick and silent. > > Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent > parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the > problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise > coming from many of these parents and from many national autism > organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the > power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get > on with the important work of curing autism. > > But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the > head down. " > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Awesome! I'll be watching. Is that 5:29 am our time? _____ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of Mike Bernoski Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:52 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: RE: OT: A commentary on CAA Just got the call, Imus is going to have me on at 6:29 EST tommorow... Got some prepping to do... I am also going to have to give back last weeks salary to my employer! Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism- <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism- <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Advocacy ] On Behalf Of M. Guppy Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:33 AM To: Texas-Autism- <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Advocacy Subject: RE: OT: A commentary on CAA Here here! And once again THANK YOU to all you GOOD PEOPLE who did SOMETHING very big! In taking a stand! " There is one thing greater than all the armies in the world --- an idea whose time has come! " Yes - the fish stinks ~ reeks horribly - and it is most definately time to filet! Thank you one and all who participated in person - with phone calls - and most importantly - with your prayers! Guppy Mike Bernoski <mike.bernoski@ <mailto:mike.bernoski%40sekureconnekt.com> sekureconnekt.com <mailto:mike.bernoski%40sekureconnekt.com> > wrote: The fish may stink from the head down, but talking about how a fish smells won't kill it. Only taking out a filet knife and poking it will cause it any pain. While the conspiracy theorists might even be right about this one, the fact remains that 10 years from now the conspiracy theorists will be making posts on internet sites where only a few people are listening while future kids are given a life sentence. Change requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now this is what the opponents are giving us. We would be remiss to stand by and do nothing because it is not exactly what we want. For our children's sake we must take advantage of every opportunity we get because all it takes for evil to thrive in this world is for good people to do nothing... - Just my 2 cents... Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism- <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:Texas-Autism- <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of fareastphillips Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:18 AM To: Texas-Autism- <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: OT: A commentary on CAA October 31, 2006 An opinion/commentary by M. The Fish Stinks from the Head Down A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top - the hospital Administrator - who was really at fault. Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the way. In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill did not go far enough to address provisions for researching environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, something fishy going on here. Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years to sort out. Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery upon misery. So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the scenes to discuss his next career move? I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias - former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were all so obviously bamboozled. I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, AMA - the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders have rendered our children sick and silent. Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise coming from many of these parents and from many national autism organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get on with the important work of curing autism. But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the head down. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 GO MIKE GO!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh man, this is great!! Please let us know if there is anything we can do to help. Aliza Mike Bernoski wrote: Just got the call, Imus is going to have me on at 6:29 EST tommorow... Got some prepping to do... I am also going to have to give back last weeks salary to my employer! Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of M. Guppy Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:33 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: RE: OT: A commentary on CAA Here here! And once again THANK YOU to all you GOOD PEOPLE who did SOMETHING very big! In taking a stand! " There is one thing greater than all the armies in the world --- an idea whose time has come! " Yes - the fish stinks ~ reeks horribly - and it is most definately time to filet! Thank you one and all who participated in person - with phone calls - and most importantly - with your prayers! Guppy Mike Bernoski <mike.bernoski@... <mailto:mike.bernoski%40sekureconnekt.com> > wrote: The fish may stink from the head down, but talking about how a fish smells won't kill it. Only taking out a filet knife and poking it will cause it any pain. While the conspiracy theorists might even be right about this one, the fact remains that 10 years from now the conspiracy theorists will be making posts on internet sites where only a few people are listening while future kids are given a life sentence. Change requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now this is what the opponents are giving us. We would be remiss to stand by and do nothing because it is not exactly what we want. For our children's sake we must take advantage of every opportunity we get because all it takes for evil to thrive in this world is for good people to do nothing... - Just my 2 cents... Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of fareastphillips Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:18 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: OT: A commentary on CAA October 31, 2006 An opinion/commentary by M. The Fish Stinks from the Head Down A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top - the hospital Administrator - who was really at fault. Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the way. In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill did not go far enough to address provisions for researching environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, something fishy going on here. Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years to sort out. Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery upon misery. So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the scenes to discuss his next career move? I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias - former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were all so obviously bamboozled. I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, AMA - the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders have rendered our children sick and silent. Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise coming from many of these parents and from many national autism organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get on with the important work of curing autism. But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the head down. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Hmmm... Then what would all the Barton's and Hastert's have to give back to us for their salary abuse of pursuing personal political power-trips instead of doing what we pay them to do? So, Nah, - use that salary to go to Washington to confront Hastert! I'll even pitch in if you get the chance! Blessings to you Bernoski --- from a former " Baginski " .... PLEASE give us the link or radio station, or whatever - to hear the IMUS show! Sincerely, , now, Guppy. Mike Bernoski wrote: Just got the call, Imus is going to have me on at 6:29 EST tommorow... Got some prepping to do... I am also going to have to give back last weeks salary to my employer! Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of M. Guppy Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:33 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: RE: OT: A commentary on CAA Here here! And once again THANK YOU to all you GOOD PEOPLE who did SOMETHING very big! In taking a stand! " There is one thing greater than all the armies in the world --- an idea whose time has come! " Yes - the fish stinks ~ reeks horribly - and it is most definately time to filet! Thank you one and all who participated in person - with phone calls - and most importantly - with your prayers! Guppy Mike Bernoski <mike.bernoski@... <mailto:mike.bernoski%40sekureconnekt.com> > wrote: The fish may stink from the head down, but talking about how a fish smells won't kill it. Only taking out a filet knife and poking it will cause it any pain. While the conspiracy theorists might even be right about this one, the fact remains that 10 years from now the conspiracy theorists will be making posts on internet sites where only a few people are listening while future kids are given a life sentence. Change requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now this is what the opponents are giving us. We would be remiss to stand by and do nothing because it is not exactly what we want. For our children's sake we must take advantage of every opportunity we get because all it takes for evil to thrive in this world is for good people to do nothing... - Just my 2 cents... Regards, Mike Bernoski *** The future belongs to those who believe *** in the beauty of their dreams... ________________________________ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of fareastphillips Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:18 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy <mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: OT: A commentary on CAA October 31, 2006 An opinion/commentary by M. The Fish Stinks from the Head Down A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top - the hospital Administrator - who was really at fault. Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the way. In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill did not go far enough to address provisions for researching environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, something fishy going on here. Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years to sort out. Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery upon misery. So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the scenes to discuss his next career move? I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias - former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were all so obviously bamboozled. I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, AMA - the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders have rendered our children sick and silent. Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise coming from many of these parents and from many national autism organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get on with the important work of curing autism. But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the head down. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Mike is right about this the conspiracy theory won't takes us any ware it will only deviate our focus and as he said " Change requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now this is what the opponents are giving us " . This is the moment to get all the different groups together and apply all the pressure we can to promote a change. As the saying goes " Divide and Conquer " is exactly what the government is trying to do, keeping the autism community from pulling together as one united front. Let's not forget that we are looking for the same thing no matter the treatment we believe in, our race, country of origin, political believes and or affiliations; we all want our children to have access to the best treatment possible as well as finding the cause and cure for autism we need to take advantage of this momentum and go as far as possible. Let's keep our focus on pushing the current issue and start working to promote one association that represents the whole autism community formed by representatives of all the different groups in order to have one single coalition that will get the attention of the government officials. The only way the autism community will be strong enough to force change at the national level is by acting as one group. Lets push to get the meeting in Washington and get all the media coverage we can to promote the cause and make more preasure on our goverment officials. I will be happy asist in any way I can and go to Washington along with Mike and all others that can go and present our case not only to the congress but to the Nation. We need to fight one battle at a time and we have to take this opportunity to win the first battle. Because all children with autism deserve acces to the proper treatment in order to unlock their full potential. Enrique DuTilly > > The fish may stink from the head down, but talking about how a fish > smells won't kill it. Only taking out a filet knife and poking it will > cause it any pain. While the conspiracy theorists might even be right > about this one, the fact remains that 10 years from now the conspiracy > theorists will be making posts on internet sites where only a few people > are listening while future kids are given a life sentence. Change > requires pressure, pressure requires mass momentum, and gaining momentum > requires taking advantage of what your opponent gives you, and right now > this is what the opponents are giving us. We would be remiss to stand by > and do nothing because it is not exactly what we want. For our > children's sake we must take advantage of every opportunity we get > because all it takes for evil to thrive in this world is for good people > to do nothing... > > > > - Just my 2 cents... > > Regards, > > Mike Bernoski > *** The future belongs to those who believe > *** in the beauty of their dreams... > > ________________________________ > > From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy > [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of > fareastphillips > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:18 AM > To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy > Subject: OT: A commentary on CAA > > > > October 31, 2006 > An opinion/commentary by M. > > The Fish Stinks from the Head Down > > A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a > friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, > she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. > Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial > performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- > all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, > who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top - the hospital > Administrator - who was really at fault. > > Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the > Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations > across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to > help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. > After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the > bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the > way. > > In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill > did not go far enough to address provisions for researching > environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. > Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the > bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under > sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of > errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. > > Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating > environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill > with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the > Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from > the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could > be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, > something fishy going on here. > > Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we > want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks > any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, > does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years > to sort out. > > Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of > children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. > As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has > blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where > passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House > Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, > the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter > broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery > upon misery. > > So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week > away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because > the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our > Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their > vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame > Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good > guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. > > Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's > planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy > and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who > hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate > corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post > in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers > of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug > manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . > Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the > scenes to discuss his next career move? > > I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's > the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart > enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, > mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after > all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. > > You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the > White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush > administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was > W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the > Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now > Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and > Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias - > former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush > administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and > the Caribbean. > > Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- > industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and > Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid > the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major > drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is > now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then > there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided > over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a > favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. > > Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more > than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know > if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money > won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol > Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which > pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " > > So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling > place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its > wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were > all so obviously bamboozled. > > I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't > understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund > the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to > once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would > have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for > years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. > > I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical > rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you > that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what > has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up > followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, > AMA - the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders > have rendered our children sick and silent. > > Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent > parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the > problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise > coming from many of these parents and from many national autism > organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the > power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get > on with the important work of curing autism. > > But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the > head down. " > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Oh - I did not mean to imply that you might be at odds with what we were doing or that you " pontificating " and if that came across -I sincerely apologize - I agree with you whole heartedly where this is coming from, loved what you had to say and am so in awe of your ability to put it down so easily and clearly - I just want to try to keep this momentum going...I really want this to take root - as I firmly believe that that is the only way we will make anything happen... Nor did I mean to imply that showing up for the event was the only valued way to participate...I think I posted numerous times how much I appreciated all the hard work and energy that everyone put into this team effort...the phonecalls and research were absolutely essential and this could not have happened if we did not pull together as a community... I always love your posts and insights - please, please continue.. fareastphillips wrote: Just to clarify, I fully support and greatly appreciate the efforts made at the rally. I was extremely dismayed that I could not attend, so my dh said, " well, write a letter " and this is what came out, more or less unedited and from the heart. It doesn't mean I don't believe in action, or that I believe putting pressure on Barton and Hastert is wasted time. Everything we do is on the way to getting there. I'm just trying to get people to think about how this all came to pass one week before mid-terms. I don't believe it was an accident at all. I'm not just sitting at home pontificating -- I'm doing what I can with the small resources (especially time) that I have. This includes contacting my school district's environmental department to ask why they are allowing mercury-laden flu shots to be dispensed in the schools, and talking to the school nurse about why my son is sick, and responding to ACHAMP and UA and (fill in the blank) action alerts, presentating talks on autism and physiology, and mentoring parents who might benefit from my knowledge about biomed, and MORE. All of us involved in the autism movement can do things, however small, to help those beyond our our home in some way. One more point -- this is not meant to be an anti-Republican tirade. I believe Bush inherited this problem, he didn't create it. During the Clinton administration, when the decision was made to " phase out " thimerosal from vaccines, Clinton OKd a purchase ($40 million if memory serves?) to get some of these bad vacs off the shelf and send them to third world countries. Nice. Now, to get ready for Halloween. Regards and thanks, > October 31, 2006 > An opinion/commentary by M. > > The Fish Stinks from the Head Down > > A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a > friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, > she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. > Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial > performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- > all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, > who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top – the hospital > Administrator – who was really at fault. > > Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the > Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations > across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to > help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. > After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the > bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the > way. > > In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill > did not go far enough to address provisions for researching > environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. > Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the > bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under > sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of > errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. > > Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating > environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill > with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the > Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from > the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could > be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, > something fishy going on here. > > Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we > want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks > any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, > does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years > to sort out. > > Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of > children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. > As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has > blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where > passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House > Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, > the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter > broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery > upon misery. > > So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week > away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because > the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our > Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their > vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame > Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good > guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. > > Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's > planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy > and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who > hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate > corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post > in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers > of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug > manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . > Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the > scenes to discuss his next career move? > > I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's > the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart > enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, > mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after > all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. > > You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the > White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush > administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was > W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the > Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now > Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and > Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias – > former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush > administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and > the Caribbean. > > Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- > industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and > Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid > the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major > drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is > now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then > there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided > over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a > favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. > > Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more > than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know > if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money > won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol > Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which > pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " > > So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling > place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its > wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were > all so obviously bamboozled. > > I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't > understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund > the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to > once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would > have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for > years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. > > I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical > rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you > that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what > has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up > followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, > AMA – the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders > have rendered our children sick and silent. > > Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent > parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the > problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise > coming from many of these parents and from many national autism > organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the > power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get > on with the important work of curing autism. > > But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the > head down. " > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 LOL, Mara I was worried about offending you that I didn't value what your efforts (and that of others who helped). No need for apologies. I was also just giving those who don't have the ability to get out of town some ideas -- we don't even really have to leave our homes to make a difference (although I hope someday to make a demonstration, right now I can only get out of town for a yearly conference). I really just did want to clarify -- > > October 31, 2006 > > An opinion/commentary by M. > > > > The Fish Stinks from the Head Down > > > > A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a > > friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, > > she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. > > Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial > > performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- > > > all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, > > who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top – the hospital > > Administrator – who was really at fault. > > > > Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the > > Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations > > across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth > to > > help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of > passing. > > After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the > > bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the > > way. > > > > In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final > bill > > did not go far enough to address provisions for researching > > environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. > > Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, > the > > bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under > > sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of > > errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. > > > > Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating > > environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the > bill > > with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the > > Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from > > the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could > > be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, > > something fishy going on here. > > > > Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we > > want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks > > any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on > autism, > > does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take > years > > to sort out. > > > > Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of > > children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number > One. > > As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he > has > > blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where > > passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House > > Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from > committee, > > the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter > > broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery > > upon misery. > > > > So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week > > away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because > > the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our > > Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their > > vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame > > Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good > > guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. > > > > Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because > he's > > planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House > Energy > > and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who > > hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate > > corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful > post > > in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and > Manufacturers > > of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug > > manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . > > Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the > > scenes to discuss his next career move? > > > > I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's > > the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not > smart > > enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, > > mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after > > all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. > > > > You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the > > White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the > Bush > > administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company > was > > W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the > > Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now > > Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and > > Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall > Tobias – > > former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush > > administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and > > the Caribbean. > > > > Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- > > industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and > > Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies > avoid > > the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major > > drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them > is > > now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then > > there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided > > over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a > > favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. > > > > Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, > more > > than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators > know > > if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma > money > > won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to > Capitol > > Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which > > pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " > > > > So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the > polling > > place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick > its > > wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were > > all so obviously bamboozled. > > > > I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't > > understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund > > the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to > > once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would > > have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for > > years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. > > > > I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical > > rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you > > that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what > > has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw- up > > followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, > AAP, > > AMA – the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose > blunders > > have rendered our children sick and silent. > > > > Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent > > parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the > > problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise > > coming from many of these parents and from many national autism > > organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the > > power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us > get > > on with the important work of curing autism. > > > > But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the > > head down. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Thank you for your courage to speak the truth as you see it. I have to agree with you on most points you made. It is not possible that one little man like Barton could can our bill, something really does stink. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 Bush may not of inherited the problem, but he did appoint a Mitch s, as VERY powerful former strategist with Eli Lilly as his first director of OMB. Hmmmmm, wasn't that the year before before " 11th hour mercury immunity clause " got put into the US Patriot Act????? The one that Dick Armey claims he did all on his own? http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0107.thompson.html The Office of Management and Budget is one of the most important agencies in our government. This agency has a central responsibility for implementing the full range of this administration's agenda, from growing the economy and creating jobs, to ensuring a strong national defense and a secure homeland. I depend on the OMB director to keep a watchful eye on the taxpayer's money, to reform the operations of our government, to make them better managed, more accountable and driven by results. And remember, the only reason we found out thimerosal was even a promise was because the Clinton Admin. put out an order to list all the places where mercury was being used. Otherwise, the connection would have taken much longer to make, I'm sure of it. S. PS I'm not saying that Bush is bad and Clinton is good, but let's keep the action's of the agencies under their administrations in perspective. Re: OT: A commentary on CAA Just to clarify, I fully support and greatly appreciate the efforts made at the rally. I was extremely dismayed that I could not attend, so my dh said, " well, write a letter " and this is what came out, more or less unedited and from the heart. It doesn't mean I don't believe in action, or that I believe putting pressure on Barton and Hastert is wasted time. Everything we do is on the way to getting there. I'm just trying to get people to think about how this all came to pass one week before mid-terms. I don't believe it was an accident at all. I'm not just sitting at home pontificating -- I'm doing what I can with the small resources (especially time) that I have. This includes contacting my school district's environmental department to ask why they are allowing mercury-laden flu shots to be dispensed in the schools, and talking to the school nurse about why my son is sick, and responding to ACHAMP and UA and (fill in the blank) action alerts, presentating talks on autism and physiology, and mentoring parents who might benefit from my knowledge about biomed, and MORE. All of us involved in the autism movement can do things, however small, to help those beyond our our home in some way. One more point -- this is not meant to be an anti-Republican tirade. I believe Bush inherited this problem, he didn't create it. During the Clinton administration, when the decision was made to " phase out " thimerosal from vaccines, Clinton OKd a purchase ($40 million if memory serves?) to get some of these bad vacs off the shelf and send them to third world countries. Nice. Now, to get ready for Halloween. Regards and thanks, > October 31, 2006 > An opinion/commentary by M. > > The Fish Stinks from the Head Down > > A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a > friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, > she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. > Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial > performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- > all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, > who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top – the hospital > Administrator – who was really at fault. > > Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the > Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations > across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth to > help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of passing. > After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the > bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the > way. > > In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final bill > did not go far enough to address provisions for researching > environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. > Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, the > bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under > sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of > errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. > > Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating > environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the bill > with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the > Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from > the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could > be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, > something fishy going on here. > > Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we > want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks > any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on autism, > does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take years > to sort out. > > Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of > children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number One. > As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he has > blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where > passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House > Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from committee, > the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter > broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery > upon misery. > > So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week > away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because > the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our > Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their > vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame > Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good > guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. > > Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because he's > planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House Energy > and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who > hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate > corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful post > in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers > of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug > manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . > Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the > scenes to discuss his next career move? > > I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's > the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not smart > enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, > mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after > all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. > > You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the > White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the Bush > administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company was > W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the > Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now > Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and > Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall Tobias – > former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush > administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and > the Caribbean. > > Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- > industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and > Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies avoid > the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major > drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them is > now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then > there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided > over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a > favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. > > Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, more > than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators know > if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma money > won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to Capitol > Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which > pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " > > So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the polling > place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick its > wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were > all so obviously bamboozled. > > I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't > understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund > the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to > once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would > have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for > years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. > > I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical > rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you > that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what > has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw-up > followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, AAP, > AMA – the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose blunders > have rendered our children sick and silent. > > Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent > parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the > problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise > coming from many of these parents and from many national autism > organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the > power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us get > on with the important work of curing autism. > > But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the > head down. " > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 I'm only saying this is not just a partisan isue. I still think the Buck Stops with Bush right now and if he were to (sincerely) ask Barton to release the bill with its current language it would happen. Regards, > > October 31, 2006 > > An opinion/commentary by M. > > > > The Fish Stinks from the Head Down > > > > A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a > > friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, > > she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. > > Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial > > performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- > > > all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, > > who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top – the hospital > > Administrator – who was really at fault. > > > > Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the > > Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations > > across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth > to > > help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of > passing. > > After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the > > bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the > > way. > > > > In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final > bill > > did not go far enough to address provisions for researching > > environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. > > Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, > the > > bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under > > sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of > > errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. > > > > Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating > > environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the > bill > > with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the > > Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from > > the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could > > be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, > > something fishy going on here. > > > > Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we > > want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks > > any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on > autism, > > does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take > years > > to sort out. > > > > Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of > > children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number > One. > > As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he > has > > blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where > > passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House > > Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from > committee, > > the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter > > broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery > > upon misery. > > > > So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week > > away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because > > the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our > > Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their > > vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame > > Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good > > guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. > > > > Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because > he's > > planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House > Energy > > and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who > > hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate > > corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful > post > > in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and > Manufacturers > > of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug > > manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . > > Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the > > scenes to discuss his next career move? > > > > I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's > > the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not > smart > > enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, > > mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after > > all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. > > > > You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the > > White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the > Bush > > administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company > was > > W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the > > Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now > > Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and > > Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall > Tobias – > > former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush > > administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and > > the Caribbean. > > > > Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- > > industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and > > Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies > avoid > > the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major > > drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them > is > > now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then > > there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided > > over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a > > favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. > > > > Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, > more > > than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators > know > > if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma > money > > won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to > Capitol > > Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which > > pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " > > > > So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the > polling > > place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick > its > > wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were > > all so obviously bamboozled. > > > > I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't > > understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund > > the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to > > once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would > > have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for > > years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. > > > > I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical > > rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you > > that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what > > has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw- up > > followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, > AAP, > > AMA – the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose > blunders > > have rendered our children sick and silent. > > > > Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent > > parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the > > problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise > > coming from many of these parents and from many national autism > > organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the > > power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us > get > > on with the important work of curing autism. > > > > But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the > > head down. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 You just gave me a great idea. The Bush family will be in Crawford for election day. Let's do a protest near the polling place in Crawford, where he will be forced to see us as he drives by to vote! Anne -- Re: OT: A commentary on CAA I'm only saying this is not just a partisan isue. I still think the Buck Stops with Bush right now and if he were to (sincerely) ask Barton to release the bill with its current language it would happen. Regards, > > October 31, 2006 > > An opinion/commentary by M. > > > > The Fish Stinks from the Head Down > > > > A long time ago, before autism was part of my daily landscape, a > > friend told me " The fish stinks from the head down. " At the time, > > she was referring to a hospital in crisis due to mismanagement. > > Many believed mid-level managers were to blame for poor financial > > performance, dismal employee morale, and physicians jumping ship -- > > > all of which threatened the hospital's existence. But my friend, > > who was " inside " , told me it was the guy at the top – the hospital > > Administrator – who was really at fault. > > > > Lately, I've been thinking about that phrase a lot. When the > > Combating Autism Act (CAA) was being drafted, autism organizations > > across the country were cursing, clawing and gnashing their teeth > to > > help design a bill that might have the slightest chance of > passing. > > After many hard months, twenty national organizations endorsed the > > bill, S.843, though there were many painful compromises along the > > way. > > > > In fact, some organizations withdrew support because the final > bill > > did not go far enough to address provisions for researching > > environmental factors, particularly vaccines and their components. > > Too much discretion, they said, would be given to the NIH. And, > the > > bill boosts funding and authority of the CDC, who has been under > > sharp criticism for what might be called a decade-long comedy of > > errors in handling the autism epidemic, if it were at all funny. > > > > Knowing that CAA included even some provisions mandating > > environmental research into the cause of autism, I believed the > bill > > with this language would never pass. Lo and behold, it passed the > > Senate unanimously. Immediately I thought, " The fish stinks from > > the head down! " I could see where some members of the Senate could > > be convinced to do the right thing, but Bill Frist? Definitely, > > something fishy going on here. > > > > Barton would have us believe his NIH bill gives us everything we > > want and need, but that's hard to swallow since the NIH bill lacks > > any language whatsoever to assure even one dime is spent on > autism, > > does nothing to mandate environmental research, and would take > years > > to sort out. > > > > Fast forward to October 31, and across the country parents of > > children with autism believe Joe Barton is Public Enemy Number > One. > > As head of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, he > has > > blocked the bill from a vote in the House of Representatives where > > passage was reportedly " assured. " Unless Speaker of the House > > Hastert basically forces Barton to release the bill from > committee, > > the death of CAA will become the latest blow in a series of bitter > > broken promises the autism community has endured, heaping misery > > upon misery. > > > > So how was this situation orchestrated? After all, we are one week > > away from mid-term elections. We can't blame our Senators, because > > the bill passed unanimously in the Senate. We can't blame our > > Representatives, because they haven't had a chance to cast their > > vote - pro or con - since Barton holds it hostage. So, we blame > > Joe Barton, and folks like Frist and Santorum can look like good > > guys. Hmmm. The smell is going from bad to worse. > > > > Could it be that Barton is willing to be the scapegoat because > he's > > planning to do what his predecessor, former head of the House > Energy > > and Commerce Committee, W. J. " " Tauzin, did? Tauzin -- who > > hails from Louisiana where it's been said they don't just tolerate > > corruption, they insist on it -- stepped down from his powerful > post > > in 2004 to take a job with Pharmaceutical Research and > Manufacturers > > of America (PhRMA), a Washington lobby representing drug > > manufacturers, where he makes a reported $2 million a year. . > > Hmmmmmm. Maybe " " has been talking to " Big Joe " behind the > > scenes to discuss his next career move? > > > > I believe Joe Barton is not the brains behind this strategy. He's > > the guy relegated to driving the getaway car because he's not > smart > > enough or important enough to orchestrate the inside job. Now, > > mind you, Barton is fairly smart and pretty important. But after > > all, Congressman Barton, you're no Bush. > > > > You see, the head of the proverbial stinking fish resides in the > > White House, where the relationship between Big Pharma and the > Bush > > administration is sickeningly incestuous. Eli Lilly and Company > was > > W's top supporter in both 2000 and 2004. Bush #1 also sat on the > > Board of Lilly. Mitch s, formerly of Eli Lilly, who is now > > Governor of Indiana, was Director of the Office of Management and > > Budget during the Bush administration. Then there's Randall > Tobias – > > former Lilly chairman and CEO who now coordinates Bush > > administration's $15 billion program to combat AIDS in Africa and > > the Caribbean. > > > > Other pharma appointments by Bush -- Ann-Marie Lynch, a drug- > > industry lobbyist who fought price controls joined the Health and > > Human Services Department where she has helped drug companies > avoid > > the limits. Also, E. Troy, a lawyer who represented major > > drug companies and who still fights for causes that benefit them > is > > now chief counsel at the Food and Drug Administration. And then > > there's A. Scully, a former hospital lobbyist who presided > > over an agency that helped a chain he once represented win a > > favorable settlement in a Medicare fraud case. > > > > Furthermore, there's a literal army of drug company lobbyists, > more > > than two for every member of Congress, letting our legislators > know > > if their votes don't go the way of Big Pharma, then Big Pharma > money > > won't come their way, which for many, could mean sayonara to > Capitol > > Hill. One physician said it best, " The degree to which > > pharmaceutical companies are running our country is appalling. " > > > > So, the political operatives are laughing all the way to the > polling > > place while CAN, who initially orchestrated CAA, is off to lick > its > > wounds and explain to the rest of the autism community how we were > > all so obviously bamboozled. > > > > I agree much of the evidence is circumstantial. I just can't > > understand why pharmaceutical companies would not themselves fund > > the largest, most transparent, irrefutable studies imaginable to > > once and for all exonerate themselves. I have to believe it would > > have cost less than they have spent fighting this legislation for > > years. If they wanted us to know the truth, they'd fund the truth. > > > > I know there are those who believe these are the nonsensical > > rantings of a crazed conspiracy theorist. I can tell you > > that " conspiracy " would be too charitable an explanation for what > > has happened. It's more aptly described as one monumental screw- up > > followed by another, and another, and another by the FDA, CDC, > AAP, > > AMA – the alphabet soup of agencies and associations whose > blunders > > have rendered our children sick and silent. > > > > Over the past several years, I've met many incredibly intelligent > > parents, researchers and physicians who certainly know that the > > problem today is much bigger than Barton. Strangely, the noise > > coming from many of these parents and from many national autism > > organizations sounds like they sincerely believe Barton has the > > power, if even the alternative, to release this bill and help us > get > > on with the important work of curing autism. > > > > But the words keep ringing in my ears, " The fish stinks from the > > head down. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 I’d go to Crawford! How far is it? A. Weber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2006 Report Share Posted November 2, 2006 So would I. It's a definite road trip, but it isn't as far as Austin from the Dallas area. nna > > I'd go to Crawford! How far is it? > > A. Weber > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2006 Report Share Posted November 2, 2006 Crawford is near Waco, and Waco is right between Austin and Dallas. Depending on how fast you drive from Austin or Dallas, it's about a 2 hour drive. Anne -- Re: OT: A commentary on CAA I’d go to Crawford! How far is it? A. Weber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2006 Report Share Posted November 2, 2006 Anne, That IS a great idea!! I'll try and find out (1) if there are regulations regarding " demonstrations " (ie, you have to apply for a permit in order to stand around with a sign) and (2) if anyone knows when Bush will be going to the polls. Anita > Crawford is near Waco, and Waco is right between Austin and Dallas. Depending on how fast you drive from Austin or Dallas, it's about a 2 hour drive. > Anne > From: Weber > Date: 11/01/06 20:15:06 > To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy > Subject: Re: OT: A commentary on CAA > I'd go to Crawford! How far is it? > A. Weber >> Texas Autism Advocacy > www.TexasAutismAdvocacy.org > Texas Disability Network > Calendar of Events > www.TexasAutismAdvocacy.org > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.