Guest guest Posted July 11, 2006 Report Share Posted July 11, 2006 An album of photos of the case presented in message #17734 has been posted into the PHOTOS section. See album Basal Cell Carcinoma. This is a well documented case of treating what viewers will obviously conclude is a well developed lesion of the lower right eyelid. A biopsy to establish the exact nature of the problem was performed 2 weeks prior to the onset of treatment, and the area of biopsy is clearly marked just to the left of the arrow. All photos are oriented the same way, so you can differentiate the area of the biopsy from the rest of the lesion throughout the healing process. Photos were also taken from superior, inferior medial and distal views, but not included as these exceed the limitations of space. The label on the first photo reveals the picture was taken one day following beginning of treatment. Over the course of 24 hours, there was no discernable change in the lesion from start of treatment to the time of the photo. Following the photos over the next 2 months shows clear healing with remarkable results achieved after only a couple of weeks. At that point, the photo taken the third week shows a regression of healing and the skin area breaking down. It was at that point that I initiated an entirely new set of frequencies for treatment. The final photo shows an obvious return to healing patterns. As stated in my original posting, no frequencies are included in this report, as my experience shows frequencies must be patient-specific. The secret to success is the determination of specific frequencies (absent the elusive microscope,) thus the arguments of what system is " best " and which frequencies will cure XYZ condition will rage on. Readers are free to draw their own conclusions. For me, the purpose of this posting is to establish a definitive case history which clearly documents the value of frequency therapy in complex medical situations. This case will be cross-posted to other groups of interest. Nate Berger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2006 Report Share Posted July 13, 2006 Those photos are of the same type of thing I had on my collar bone. I used 2008 and 2128 and 2148 but it made it like a 'blow up'and the sides of the crater got very sore everytime I used those frequencies with handholds. So I stopped using them. Eventually I tried using just two silver rods and a 20k resistor connected to a 6 volt battery and put the BCC in between the two rods. It completely disappeared after 3 days and hasnt come back... > > An album of photos of the case presented in message #17734 has been > posted into the PHOTOS section. See album Basal Cell Carcinoma. > > This is a well documented case of treating what viewers will obviously > conclude is a well developed lesion of the lower right eyelid. > > A biopsy to establish the exact nature of the problem was performed 2 > weeks prior to the onset of treatment, and the area of biopsy is > clearly marked just to the left of the arrow. All photos are oriented > the same way, so you can differentiate the area of the biopsy from the > rest of the lesion throughout the healing process. Photos were also > taken from superior, inferior medial and distal views, but not > included as these exceed the limitations of space. > > The label on the first photo reveals the picture was taken one day > following beginning of treatment. Over the course of 24 hours, there > was no discernable change in the lesion from start of treatment to the > time of the photo. > > Following the photos over the next 2 months shows clear healing with > remarkable results achieved after only a couple of weeks. At that > point, the photo taken the third week shows a regression of healing > and the skin area breaking down. It was at that point that I initiated > an entirely new set of frequencies for treatment. The final photo > shows an obvious return to healing patterns. > > As stated in my original posting, no frequencies are included in this > report, as my experience shows frequencies must be patient-specific. > The secret to success is the determination of specific frequencies > (absent the elusive microscope,) thus the arguments of what system is > " best " and which frequencies will cure XYZ condition will rage on. > > Readers are free to draw their own conclusions. For me, the purpose of > this posting is to establish a definitive case history which clearly > documents the value of frequency therapy in complex medical situations. > > This case will be cross-posted to other groups of interest. > > Nate Berger > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 Greetings silverlofts, How many treatments, how far apart were the rods and how long for each treatment? Thanks, Jeff > > Those photos are of the same type of thing I had on my collar bone. > I used 2008 and 2128 and 2148 but it made it like a 'blow up'and the > sides of the crater got very sore everytime I used those frequencies > with handholds. So I stopped using them. Eventually I tried using > just two silver rods and a 20k resistor connected to a 6 volt battery > and put the BCC in between the two rods. It completely disappeared > after 3 days and hasnt come back... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 I would like to hear from someone like Ian to comment about this. Hulda found out that just a positive electrical pulse applied by electrodes seems to get rid of a broad range of pathogens compared to a AC pulse. She did still use 30 khz puse frequency. Although specific frequencies targetting a specific pathogen is pretty much accepted as the best method, it still seems like straight DC has beeen very effective for many people. According to these posts it seems like this person did pretty well with DC. > > > > Those photos are of the same type of thing I had on my collar bone. > > I used 2008 and 2128 and 2148 but it made it like a 'blow up'and > the > > sides of the crater got very sore everytime I used those > frequencies > > with handholds. So I stopped using them. Eventually I tried using > > just two silver rods and a 20k resistor connected to a 6 volt > battery > > and put the BCC in between the two rods. It completely disappeared > > after 3 days and hasnt come back... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 Thank you for the BCC report. Questions: 1. How far were the silver rods from the lesion? 2. How long was the treatment time? 3. Did you keep the polarity the same for all treatments? 4. Do you think that silver ions migrated into the lesion and affected the outcome? Loyd http://www.royalrife.com Re: REVISITED: Treating a Cancer with Rife Frequencies Those photos are of the same type of thing I had on my collar bone. I used 2008 and 2128 and 2148 but it made it like a 'blow up'and the sides of the crater got very sore everytime I used those frequencies with handholds. So I stopped using them. Eventually I tried using just two silver rods and a 20k resistor connected to a 6 volt battery and put the BCC in between the two rods. It completely disappeared after 3 days and hasnt come back... > > An album of photos of the case presented in message #17734 has been > posted into the PHOTOS section. See album Basal Cell Carcinoma. > > This is a well documented case of treating what viewers will obviously > conclude is a well developed lesion of the lower right eyelid. > > A biopsy to establish the exact nature of the problem was performed 2 > weeks prior to the onset of treatment, and the area of biopsy is > clearly marked just to the left of the arrow. All photos are oriented > the same way, so you can differentiate the area of the biopsy from the > rest of the lesion throughout the healing process. Photos were also > taken from superior, inferior medial and distal views, but not > included as these exceed the limitations of space. > > The label on the first photo reveals the picture was taken one day > following beginning of treatment. Over the course of 24 hours, there > was no discernable change in the lesion from start of treatment to the > time of the photo. > > Following the photos over the next 2 months shows clear healing with > remarkable results achieved after only a couple of weeks. At that > point, the photo taken the third week shows a regression of healing > and the skin area breaking down. It was at that point that I initiated > an entirely new set of frequencies for treatment. The final photo > shows an obvious return to healing patterns. > > As stated in my original posting, no frequencies are included in this > report, as my experience shows frequencies must be patient-specific. > The secret to success is the determination of specific frequencies > (absent the elusive microscope,) thus the arguments of what system is > " best " and which frequencies will cure XYZ condition will rage on. > > Readers are free to draw their own conclusions. For me, the purpose of > this posting is to establish a definitive case history which clearly > documents the value of frequency therapy in complex medical situations. > > This case will be cross-posted to other groups of interest. > > Nate Berger > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Jeff. I used only the one time. Rods are 3/4 " apart and 2mm dia. I covered the ends of the rods with cut-off cotton shoe laces and wet them with tap water... and applied to the 'volcano' > > > > Those photos are of the same type of thing I had on my collar bone. > > I used 2008 and 2128 and 2148 but it made it like a 'blow up'and > the > > sides of the crater got very sore everytime I used those > frequencies > > with handholds. So I stopped using them. Eventually I tried using > > just two silver rods and a 20k resistor connected to a 6 volt > battery > > and put the BCC in between the two rods. It completely disappeared > > after 3 days and hasnt come back... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Hi In answer you questions: > 1. How far were the silver rods from the lesion? A/ About 5mm > > 2. How long was the treatment time? A/ About 2 to 3 minutes > > 3. Did you keep the polarity the same for all treatments? A/ I kept reversing the electrodes probably every 20 secs. > > 4. Do you think that silver ions migrated into the lesion and affected the outcome? A/ YES Try it. It may work for you.. Noel > > > > An album of photos of the case presented in message #17734 has been > > posted into the PHOTOS section. See album Basal Cell Carcinoma. > > > > This is a well documented case of treating what viewers will > obviously > > conclude is a well developed lesion of the lower right eyelid. > > > > A biopsy to establish the exact nature of the problem was performed > 2 > > weeks prior to the onset of treatment, and the area of biopsy is > > clearly marked just to the left of the arrow. All photos are > oriented > > the same way, so you can differentiate the area of the biopsy from > the > > rest of the lesion throughout the healing process. Photos were also > > taken from superior, inferior medial and distal views, but not > > included as these exceed the limitations of space. > > > > The label on the first photo reveals the picture was taken one day > > following beginning of treatment. Over the course of 24 hours, there > > was no discernable change in the lesion from start of treatment to > the > > time of the photo. > > > > Following the photos over the next 2 months shows clear healing with > > remarkable results achieved after only a couple of weeks. At that > > point, the photo taken the third week shows a regression of healing > > and the skin area breaking down. It was at that point that I > initiated > > an entirely new set of frequencies for treatment. The final photo > > shows an obvious return to healing patterns. > > > > As stated in my original posting, no frequencies are included in > this > > report, as my experience shows frequencies must be patient- specific. > > The secret to success is the determination of specific frequencies > > (absent the elusive microscope,) thus the arguments of what system > is > > " best " and which frequencies will cure XYZ condition will rage on. > > > > Readers are free to draw their own conclusions. For me, the purpose > of > > this posting is to establish a definitive case history which clearly > > documents the value of frequency therapy in complex medical > situations. > > > > This case will be cross-posted to other groups of interest. > > > > Nate Berger > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.