Re: What does 3(2127), 5(2127), etc mean pertaining to cancer frequencies?

[Guest guest]

First of all, this article refers to pressure waves in these lower frequency

ranges. From my understanding the difference between pressure waves and

electromagnetic waves is that ultrasound refers to sound pressure waves (above

20KHz there are air molecules moving back and forth), electromagnetic waves is

electric and

magnetic fields varying in time.

The frequencies mentioned therefore (if my research is correct) are

electromagnetic waves NOT pressure waves.

At this point I cannot comment on any further meaning attached to the article,

as the research is possibly suspect. The expressions 3(2127) ia meaningless to

me. Of course, I have not read the entire article.

Someone can correct me if I am wrong and kindly put some meaning to this

question.

http://www.truerife.com

mar7con wrote:

In the file section (Europe) under Rife Therapy and Cancer, at the

bottom listed as a P.S., it states that many types of cancer can be

easily and quickly killed by exposure to pressure square waves of a

frequency of approx 2127...one or more of the higher frequency hidden

fourier sine wave components. i.e. 3(2127), 5(2127), 7(2127), 9(2127),

etc. opens up ion gates on the cancer cells' membrane and radically

changes the ionic conditions inside the cancer cell.....etc. etc.

Can anyone explain the 3(2127), etc.???

Thanks.

[Guest guest]

This is referring to the odd harmonics generated by a square wave.

1,3,5,7,9 and so on. Just multiply 2127 by odd number preceeding go get

the harmonic frequency.

There is at least one US patents wherein all the common frequencies we use

were granted a patent. Another person tried to copyright all the common

frequencies.

Someone also tried to trademark the words " Royal Rife " . This attempt was

dropped.

Jim Bare

> In the file section (Europe) under Rife Therapy and Cancer, at the

>bottom listed as a P.S., it states that many types of cancer can be

>easily and quickly killed by exposure to pressure square waves of a

>frequency of approx 2127...one or more of the higher frequency hidden

>fourier sine wave components. i.e. 3(2127), 5(2127), 7(2127), 9(2127),

>etc. opens up ion gates on the cancer cells' membrane and radically

>changes the ionic conditions inside the cancer cell.....etc. etc.

>

>Can anyone explain the 3(2127), etc.???

>

>Thanks.

[Guest guest]

Hi, I think 3(2127) it is referring to the third harmonic of 2127 Hz.

square wave,

Regards,

Tigchelaar wrote:

> First of all, this article refers to pressure waves in these lower frequency

ranges. From my understanding the difference between pressure waves and

electromagnetic waves is that ultrasound refers to sound pressure waves (above

20KHz there are air molecules moving back and forth), electromagnetic waves is

electric and

> magnetic fields varying in time.

>

> The frequencies mentioned therefore (if my research is correct) are

electromagnetic waves NOT pressure waves.

>

> At this point I cannot comment on any further meaning attached to the

article, as the research is possibly suspect. The expressions 3(2127) ia

meaningless to me. Of course, I have not read the entire article.

>

> Someone can correct me if I am wrong and kindly put some meaning to this

question.

>

> http://www.truerife.com

>

> mar7con wrote:

> In the file section (Europe) under Rife Therapy and Cancer, at the

> bottom listed as a P.S., it states that many types of cancer can be

> easily and quickly killed by exposure to pressure square waves of a

> frequency of approx 2127...one or more of the higher frequency hidden

> fourier sine wave components. i.e. 3(2127), 5(2127), 7(2127), 9(2127),

> etc. opens up ion gates on the cancer cells' membrane and radically

> changes the ionic conditions inside the cancer cell.....etc. etc.

>

> Can anyone explain the 3(2127), etc.???

>

> Thanks.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

If anyone is working in harmonics, please remember that the first

harmonic is the fundamental frequency, and the second harmonic is two

times the fundamental etc.

Miles.

sqryx wrote:

>Hi, I think 3(2127) it is referring to the third harmonic of 2127 Hz.

>square wave,

>

>Regards,

>

>

>

> Tigchelaar wrote:

>

>

>>First of all, this article refers to pressure waves in these lower frequency

ranges. From my understanding the difference between pressure waves and

electromagnetic waves is that ultrasound refers to sound pressure waves (above

20KHz there are air molecules moving back and forth), electromagnetic waves is

electric and

>>magnetic fields varying in time.

>>

>> The frequencies mentioned therefore (if my research is correct) are

electromagnetic waves NOT pressure waves.

>>

>> At this point I cannot comment on any further meaning attached to the

article, as the research is possibly suspect. The expressions 3(2127) ia

meaningless to me. Of course, I have not read the entire article.

>>

>> Someone can correct me if I am wrong and kindly put some meaning to this

question.

>>

>> http://www.truerife.com

>>

>>mar7con wrote:

>> In the file section (Europe) under Rife Therapy and Cancer, at the

>>bottom listed as a P.S., it states that many types of cancer can be

>>easily and quickly killed by exposure to pressure square waves of a

>>frequency of approx 2127...one or more of the higher frequency hidden

>>fourier sine wave components. i.e. 3(2127), 5(2127), 7(2127), 9(2127),

>>etc. opens up ion gates on the cancer cells' membrane and radically

>>changes the ionic conditions inside the cancer cell.....etc. etc.

>>

>>Can anyone explain the 3(2127), etc.???

>>

>>Thanks.

>>

[Guest guest]

,

Most of us are using square wave generators. For a square wave, the second

harmonic is three times the fundamental.

Jim Bare

>If anyone is working in harmonics, please remember that the first

>harmonic is the fundamental frequency, and the second harmonic is two

>times the fundamental etc.

>

> Miles.

[Guest guest]

I am a little confused with the term fundamantal frequency being applied

to such low values! My understanding is that Rife fundamental frequencies for

organisms were of a much higher magnitude e.g tetanus was determined by RRR to

have fundamental frequency in the order of 234 KHz with all lower frequencies

being sub-harmonics of the FF or CRF as I believe Jim has called them.

Please explain.

Best Regards

Tony Pagdin

rifetech@... wrote: ,

Most of us are using square wave generators. For a square wave, the second

harmonic is three times the fundamental.

Jim Bare

>If anyone is working in harmonics, please remember that the first

>harmonic is the fundamental frequency, and the second harmonic is two

>times the fundamental etc.

>

> Miles.

[Guest guest]

rifetech@... wrote:

> ,

>

> Most of us are using square wave generators. For a square wave, the second

> harmonic is three times the fundamental.

>

> Jim Bare

here: The overtone frequencies are usually determined by

the impedance of the circuit, not by the harmonic of the fundamental.

To see what actually is generated by a square wave, I hooked my digital

square wave generator, a GME SG-10 $100, to a EMEM3D from

www.rifelabs.com. I put an oscilloscope with a wire attached to a probe

right in front of the plasma tube and you can clearly see the signal

being generated.

Of course, the signal is defined by the spark coils in the device, but

what you get at low frequencies is ringing after the square wave edge

that oscillates several times, increasing in frequency and decreasing in

amplitude, which is over after about ten percent of the one half cycle.

When you drive the EMEM3D with a ten kilohertz square wave, what you see

is a pure sine wave at the same fundamental.

I doubt that you could generalize what any higher wave forms or

frequencies would be given that the circuit, body, pads or plasma tubes

are different between different situations and even different through

time with the same situation as caused by body movement and varying pad

contact.

Remember impedance is a complex number and can be different at each

fundamental frequency making any generalization of harmonics useless.

Strings on a musical instrument will exhibit the integer harmonics

depending on where on the string it was plucked, but a driving circuit

is entirely different that a plucking circuit because the driving

circuit is on all the time and the plucking is an instantaneous force

which immediately goes away and lets the string and the body of the

instrument do it's own thing.

To me, if you really wanted to oscillate a mechanical structure to a

physical breaking point, then driving it with a sine wave would require

less power. I'm sure mechanical engineers know a lot more about this

subject than me.

I hope I'm not overstating my knowledge here, but I've spent thousands

of hours staring at ringing in circuits on printed circuit boards being

driven by TTL square wave logic devices. These are in the 100 megahertz

range, but many of the same principals and effects apply in mechanical

systems in the audio frequency range.

[Guest guest]

Hi,

I am discussing Sq. Waves, 50%duty, bipolar.

May be truly/actually it needs to be called 3rd. harmonic which is 3 times

the fundamental & not to be called 2nd. harmonic.

Square waves contain all oddd harmonics, like 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15 etc.

1st. is the fundamental frequency.

Even harmonics, like 2,4,6,8,10 etc. actually average out to zero, & do not

appear in square wave Fourier analysis.

So what you call as 2nd. harmonic is 3rd., & what you call 3rd. may be

actually 5th. & what you call 4th. is truly 7th.

I know you are a PRO in rife field.

Oversights can't be ruled out. All of us make oversights.

Mr. Ken is an expert in harmonics.

By a cc: of this email, I request Mr. Ken Uzzel to give a PRO opinion on

harmonics.

Honestly I am putting my 0.02c so that people do not remain confused by

conflicting statements.

Please excuse me, it generates some stirring up.

Healthy Regards,

Gesi

============================

> ,

>

> Most of us are using square wave generators. For a square wave, the second

> harmonic is three times the fundamental.

>

> Jim Bare

*******************************************

>

>

>>If anyone is working in harmonics, please remember that the first

>>harmonic is the fundamental frequency, and the second harmonic is two

>>times the fundamental etc.

>>

>> Miles.

[Guest guest]

Hi,

In a square wave, it contains only odd harmonics, 1,3,5,7 .... etc.

If you run FREX, you can see clearly, that there are no even harmonics in a

square wave.

Even harmonics (2,4,6,....) appear in ramp/sawtooth wave forms & the like.

One doesn't need expensive harmonic analyzers to grasp this concept.

Healthy Regards,

Gesi

=========================

Re: What does 3(2127), 5(2127), etc mean pertaining to

cancer frequencies?

> here: The overtone frequencies are usually determined by

> the impedance of the circuit, not by the harmonic of the fundamental.

>

> To see what actually is generated by a square wave, I hooked my digital

> square wave generator, a GME SG-10 $100, to a EMEM3D from

> www.rifelabs.com. I put an oscilloscope with a wire attached to a probe

> right in front of the plasma tube and you can clearly see the signal

> being generated.

[Guest guest]

Hi Gesi,

Thanks for your kind words, but I am no expert on harmonics.

I'm a middle of the range rifer :-)

I've got a good spectrum analyser that lets me look at harmonics to 1.2 GigHz,

so I know the truth about devices I research.

My greatest area of interest, isn't so much about accuracies coming from

oscillators, but what is going into the body. This is the operational end of

this technology, that is what's hitting the body, what is coming out of the

plasma light or what is coming from the electrodes under body loading.

Please, not too much stirring with my name in it ... most of the people here

like me, I want to keep it this way if I can.

I'm just a massage guy, not an engineer.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Frex - CHIamp

Re: What does 3(2127), 5(2127), etc mean pertaining to cancer

frequencies?

Hi,

I am discussing Sq. Waves, 50%duty, bipolar.

May be truly/actually it needs to be called 3rd. harmonic which is 3 times

the fundamental & not to be called 2nd. harmonic.

Square waves contain all oddd harmonics, like 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15 etc.

1st. is the fundamental frequency.

Even harmonics, like 2,4,6,8,10 etc. actually average out to zero, & do not

appear in square wave Fourier analysis.

So what you call as 2nd. harmonic is 3rd., & what you call 3rd. may be

actually 5th. & what you call 4th. is truly 7th.

I know you are a PRO in rife field.

Oversights can't be ruled out. All of us make oversights.

Mr. Ken is an expert in harmonics.

By a cc: of this email, I request Mr. Ken Uzzel to give a PRO opinion on

harmonics.

Honestly I am putting my 0.02c so that people do not remain confused by

conflicting statements.

Please excuse me, it generates some stirring up.

Healthy Regards,

Gesi

============================

> ,

>

> Most of us are using square wave generators. For a square wave, the second

> harmonic is three times the fundamental.

>

> Jim Bare

*******************************************

>

>

>>If anyone is working in harmonics, please remember that the first

>>harmonic is the fundamental frequency, and the second harmonic is two

>>times the fundamental etc.

>>

>> Miles.