Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

[Guest guest]

I have used the r/b with chemo on 2 ppl with good results. The doctor even

said " whatever your doing, keep doing it " ....mike.

[Guest guest]

Guy,

Go here for an explanation of how chemotherapy and your R/B device can

interact in a positive manner.

http://www.rifetechnologies.com/Pulsedfield.html

The technique has worked for some people. One member of the list who posts

often ( Luigi) , yet may not be aware of the paper, is using chemo with his

EMEM to very positive effect.

Jim Bare

>My son wants her to undergo,treatments with my R/B unit.I think she

>might be willing to try it,but she has just started on chemo.

>I am very reluctant to have her use the R/B unit in conjunction

>with chemo.

>Any suggestions?I

[Guest guest]

I am almost done getting rid or Stage 4 terminal bladder cancer, and I have

been using Dr. 's zapper at first, then a " poor man's Rife " from

holman.net, and now an EM+ dual plasma tube system while undergoing weekly

chemo.

There are issues to be dealt with when going through a successful Rife

session involving the person getting sometimes a bit weaker for about a day

while toxins are flushed out of the body (been there SEVERAL TIMES).

The best bet is to try and make sure that the person is not so debilitated

as to faint at the drop of a hat, and chemo IS debilitating!

As far as I am concerned the EM+ that's finishing off my cancer has not made

the effects of Gemzar, Carboplatin, Iridia and some other garbage worse and

in fact there are frequencies that will help A LOT with things like bone

pain (been there too) and red and white blood cell production: one of the

aftereffects of bone metastases is that marrow sometimes stops doing its

stuff-my bone metastases almost killed me.

It would be very interesting for the lady to visit a good naturopath,

someone possibly experienced with nutrition AND Rife: there are DEFINITELY

glands that are being affected by the cancer AND the chemo that can use

help, which should make her feel better-in my case the hypothalamus gland

was shorted out and the thyroid was functioning only at about 60% capacity I

was told.

And keeping the kidneys in top shape is mandatory for the cancer patient as

a rule, Rife or not.

Plus chemo will stop most digestive processes on solid food with a speed the

healthy cannot begin to fathom, and only a naturopath can help: I doubt that

one would trust Milk of Magnesia for someone who's just been given Taxol...

Luigi

stage IV metastasized breast cancer

> Hello group.My son's mother in law has just been diagnosed

> with

> breast cancer,stage IV,cancer has spread to her bones and possibly

> elsewhere,have not been told all the details.

> My son wants her to undergo,treatments with my R/B unit.I think she

> might be willing to try it,but she has just started on chemo.

> I am very reluctant to have her use the R/B unit in conjunction

> with chemo.

> Any suggestions?I would not want first of all to get into trouble

> with the allopathic world.I am not a doctor,but am willing to share

> this machine with anyone in trouble.

> I would dearly appreciate any response.You can email me directly if

> you wish.Thank you all,for your support.

> Regards

> Guy

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi,

After reading the article, I still think Rife would be much more effective

without the toxic chemotherapy. Why should you have to use an alternative

therapy to " clean up the toxicity of the conventional therapy " when the

alternative therapy could be used more powerfully alone or with other alternaive

therapies?

Bare wrote:

Guy,

Go here for an explanation of how chemotherapy and your R/B device can

interact in a positive manner.

http://www.rifetechnologies.com/Pulsedfield.html

The technique has worked for some people. One member of the list who posts

often ( Luigi) , yet may not be aware of the paper, is using chemo with his

EMEM to very positive effect.

Jim Bare

>My son wants her to undergo,treatments with my R/B unit.I think she

>might be willing to try it,but she has just started on chemo.

>I am very reluctant to have her use the R/B unit in conjunction

>with chemo.

>Any suggestions?I

[Guest guest]

,

Sad to say, frequency therapies and the treatment of cancer is not anywhere

near 100% effective. Response rates vary based upon many different factors.

What an individual does is one thing. Often, regardless of what is tried,

the treatment is not all that effecive. Use of low dose chemo and a pulsed

field instrument seems to work for at least some people.This combination

offers a new option that has made a difference. I have heard reports that

this method has been indirectly supported by patients oncologists. They are

shown the paper, and then precribe the correct medication for the patient's

cancer. Sort of a wait and see attiude.The patient is getting treatment,

and is being closely monitored. The lab tests don't lie.

What is proposed is extremely low dose chemotherapy. There is another

aspect to this. At some point a bridge must be built between the existing

primary forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years of

training is now obsolete. One is not going to convince the malpractice

lawyers that the sole use of a frequency device is the preferred method of

treatment. One isn't going to convince the FDA, the FTC, and legislatures

at all levels that they should accept this a the sole treatment of cancer.

That all government research funding into a biochemical solution to cancer

should stop.

But a bridge, a way to get to that point can occur, with the combination of

the old and the new.

http://www.rifetechnologies.com/Pulsedfield.html

Jim Bare

> After reading the article, I still think Rife would be much more

>effective without the toxic chemotherapy. Why should you have to use an

>alternative therapy to " clean up the toxicity of the conventional therapy "

>when the alternative therapy could be used more powerfully alone or with

>other alternaive therapies?

>

[Guest guest]

On 2/26/06, rifetech@...

wrote:

> At some point a bridge must be built between the existing

> primary forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

Current oncology is a wicked disgrace. *With all due respect*, Jim, to

build a bridge with an irrational system does not seem workable or logical.

BTW, Dr Lorraine Day cured herself of terminal invasive ductile breast

cancer and she explains just how she did it at www.drday.com even without

the advantage of frequency medicine.

> One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years of

> training is now obsolete.

This is exactly what I have done since my tumor was dx in '98. I refuse

their insane protocols that bear no relationship to what causes nor cures

cancer.

JMHO as well as my experience,

....

[Guest guest]

I believe Jim makes a very valid point.

When clients come to me for body support therapy, they are often well into

oncology treatment, and reports fed back to me have indicated that frequency

therapy is a positive complementary field that can work with oncology, and not

an alternative treatment.

I believe this is best for the person with the cancer, in that they are properly

monitored by specialists. Specialists are then more willing to see the body

enhancing qualities of pulse field therapies when the therapy is presented as a

complementary treatment, and not an alternative.

Jim is building great bridges here and this approach can only enhance the

treatments available for cancer sufferers.

At the end of the day, the only thing that is important is that the patient

receives the best health care possible under the presenting circumstances.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Frex - CHIamp

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

,

Sad to say, frequency therapies and the treatment of cancer is not anywhere

near 100% effective. Response rates vary based upon many different factors.

What an individual does is one thing. Often, regardless of what is tried,

the treatment is not all that effecive. Use of low dose chemo and a pulsed

field instrument seems to work for at least some people.This combination

offers a new option that has made a difference. I have heard reports that

this method has been indirectly supported by patients oncologists. They are

shown the paper, and then precribe the correct medication for the patient's

cancer. Sort of a wait and see attiude.The patient is getting treatment,

and is being closely monitored. The lab tests don't lie.

What is proposed is extremely low dose chemotherapy. There is another

aspect to this. At some point a bridge must be built between the existing

primary forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years of

training is now obsolete. One is not going to convince the malpractice

lawyers that the sole use of a frequency device is the preferred method of

treatment. One isn't going to convince the FDA, the FTC, and legislatures

at all levels that they should accept this a the sole treatment of cancer.

That all government research funding into a biochemical solution to cancer

should stop.

But a bridge, a way to get to that point can occur, with the combination of

the old and the new.

http://www.rifetechnologies.com/Pulsedfield.html

Jim Bare

> After reading the article, I still think Rife would be much more

>effective without the toxic chemotherapy. Why should you have to use an

>alternative therapy to " clean up the toxicity of the conventional therapy "

>when the alternative therapy could be used more powerfully alone or with

>other alternaive therapies?

[Guest guest]

Such a " bridge " cannot ever be built when dealing with allopaths as

territorial as those I have met.

I can recall at least a half dozen screaming fights between me and the

doctors I went to for a second opinion on my diagnosis of terminal cancer.

They had noticed that unlike other patients on Gemzar, Carboplatin, Iridia

and some assorted other " wonder drugs " I was not on a wheelchair, and they

did not care what I was doing: if they could not directly control it they

wanted me not to have it to the extent that even plain vanilla vitamin E and

ascorbic acid were on their " no-no " list...

A bridge like the one you suggest would likely have a negative effect on a

doctor's next vacation, new house or car, so it is an obscenity no allopath

will even allow.

Luigi

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

> On 2/26/06, rifetech@...

> wrote:

>

>> At some point a bridge must be built between the existing

>> primary forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

>

>

> Current oncology is a wicked disgrace. *With all due respect*, Jim, to

> build a bridge with an irrational system does not seem workable or

> logical.

>

> BTW, Dr Lorraine Day cured herself of terminal invasive ductile breast

> cancer and she explains just how she did it at www.drday.com even without

> the advantage of frequency medicine.

>

>

>

>> One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years of

>> training is now obsolete.

>

>

> This is exactly what I have done since my tumor was dx in '98. I refuse

> their insane protocols that bear no relationship to what causes nor cures

> cancer.

>

> JMHO as well as my experience,

> ...

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

When you have been a God for so long it is hard when your worshippers find a

new religion.

Terry

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

Such a " bridge " cannot ever be built when dealing with allopaths as

territorial as those I have met.

I can recall at least a half dozen screaming fights between me and the

doctors I went to for a second opinion on my diagnosis of terminal cancer.

They had noticed that unlike other patients on Gemzar, Carboplatin, Iridia

and some assorted other " wonder drugs " I was not on a wheelchair, and they

did not care what I was doing: if they could not directly control it they

wanted me not to have it to the extent that even plain vanilla vitamin E and

ascorbic acid were on their " no-no " list...

A bridge like the one you suggest would likely have a negative effect on a

doctor's next vacation, new house or car, so it is an obscenity no allopath

will even allow.

Luigi

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

> On 2/26/06, rifetech@...

> wrote:

>

>> At some point a bridge must be built between the existing

>> primary forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

>

>

> Current oncology is a wicked disgrace. *With all due respect*, Jim, to

> build a bridge with an irrational system does not seem workable or

> logical.

>

> BTW, Dr Lorraine Day cured herself of terminal invasive ductile breast

> cancer and she explains just how she did it at www.drday.com even without

> the advantage of frequency medicine.

>

>

>

>> One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years of

>> training is now obsolete.

>

>

> This is exactly what I have done since my tumor was dx in '98. I refuse

> their insane protocols that bear no relationship to what causes nor cures

> cancer.

>

> JMHO as well as my experience,

> ...

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Luigi,

I do not have a background in psychology, and perhaps some on the list that

do might elaborate more on your experiences.

My personal opinion... I think that many oncologists become somewhat

" demented " after practicing for a certain amount of time. They must

rationalize the horrible consequences of thier treatment. Finding someone

that maintains their health during treatment, that does not suffer,is

frightening. A patient that does what no other patient they have ever

treated with your condition has done. RECOVER is mind altering. Such a

patient makes them stop for a moment in time and face the brutal reality of

what it is they are doing. There is a better way, and they must either

acknowledge it, or erect some defense mechanism to protect their mental

balance. Either that or slip over into extreme guilt, and possibly complete

insanity.

Building a bridge through an association of frequency therapies with the

existing treatment paradigm is absolutely necessary. There are 500,000+ new

cases of serious cancers in the US every year. Only a relative handful of

these people will utilize non medical therapies exclusively to successfully

treat their cancer. It is known from studies that the majority of the rest

will utilize some combination of conventional therapy and non medical

therapies to treat their cancer.

Pulsed fields with chemotherapy are a viable, and evidence supported method

of adjuviant treatment. In the Forrest case, testimony was entered

about how the witnesses' father in law had gone from a PSA of 70 to 4 in 90

days via a combination of B-17 ( a chemotherapy medication ) and an

electrode type of frequency instrument.

Cancer is a 150 billion dollar + industry in the US. There must be a bridge

or acceptance will never occur. When this occurs, time and continued

research will see the eventual development of new instruments and new

protocols to use them. The old methods of treatment will drop away, and be

little more than a historic memory of the past.

Jim Bare

>Such a " bridge " cannot ever be built when dealing with allopaths as

>territorial as those I have met.

>I can recall at least a half dozen screaming fights between me and the

>doctors I went to for a second opinion on my diagnosis of terminal cancer.

>They had noticed that unlike other patients on Gemzar, Carboplatin, Iridia

>and some assorted other " wonder drugs " I was not on a wheelchair, and they

>did not care what I was doing: if they could not directly control it they

>wanted me not to have it to the extent that even plain vanilla vitamin E and

>ascorbic acid were on their " no-no " list...

>A bridge like the one you suggest would likely have a negative effect on a

>doctor's next vacation, new house or car, so it is an obscenity no allopath

>will even allow.

>Luigi

>

>

>

>

> Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

>

>

>> On 2/26/06, rifetech@...

>> wrote:

>>

>>> At some point a bridge must be built between the existing

>>> primary forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

>>

>>

>> Current oncology is a wicked disgrace. *With all due respect*, Jim, to

>> build a bridge with an irrational system does not seem workable or

>> logical.

>>

>> BTW, Dr Lorraine Day cured herself of terminal invasive ductile breast

>> cancer and she explains just how she did it at www.drday.com even without

>> the advantage of frequency medicine.

>>

>>

>>

>>> One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years of

>>> training is now obsolete.

>>

>>

>> This is exactly what I have done since my tumor was dx in '98. I refuse

>> their insane protocols that bear no relationship to what causes nor cures

>> cancer.

>>

>> JMHO as well as my experience,

>> ...

>>

>>

>>

[Guest guest]

Hi,

Excuse me if I'm wrong but I believe B-17 is laetrile and not a chemotherapy

treatment.

rifetech@... wrote:

Luigi,

I do not have a background in psychology, and perhaps some on the list that

do might elaborate more on your experiences.

My personal opinion... I think that many oncologists become somewhat

" demented " after practicing for a certain amount of time. They must

rationalize the horrible consequences of thier treatment. Finding someone

that maintains their health during treatment, that does not suffer,is

frightening. A patient that does what no other patient they have ever

treated with your condition has done. RECOVER is mind altering. Such a

patient makes them stop for a moment in time and face the brutal reality of

what it is they are doing. There is a better way, and they must either

acknowledge it, or erect some defense mechanism to protect their mental

balance. Either that or slip over into extreme guilt, and possibly complete

insanity.

Building a bridge through an association of frequency therapies with the

existing treatment paradigm is absolutely necessary. There are 500,000+ new

cases of serious cancers in the US every year. Only a relative handful of

these people will utilize non medical therapies exclusively to successfully

treat their cancer. It is known from studies that the majority of the rest

will utilize some combination of conventional therapy and non medical

therapies to treat their cancer.

Pulsed fields with chemotherapy are a viable, and evidence supported method

of adjuviant treatment. In the Forrest case, testimony was entered

about how the witnesses' father in law had gone from a PSA of 70 to 4 in 90

days via a combination of B-17 ( a chemotherapy medication ) and an

electrode type of frequency instrument.

Cancer is a 150 billion dollar + industry in the US. There must be a bridge

or acceptance will never occur. When this occurs, time and continued

research will see the eventual development of new instruments and new

protocols to use them. The old methods of treatment will drop away, and be

little more than a historic memory of the past.

Jim Bare

>Such a " bridge " cannot ever be built when dealing with allopaths as

>territorial as those I have met.

>I can recall at least a half dozen screaming fights between me and the

>doctors I went to for a second opinion on my diagnosis of terminal cancer.

>They had noticed that unlike other patients on Gemzar, Carboplatin, Iridia

>and some assorted other " wonder drugs " I was not on a wheelchair, and they

>did not care what I was doing: if they could not directly control it they

>wanted me not to have it to the extent that even plain vanilla vitamin E and

>ascorbic acid were on their " no-no " list...

>A bridge like the one you suggest would likely have a negative effect on a

>doctor's next vacation, new house or car, so it is an obscenity no allopath

>will even allow.

>Luigi

>

>

>

>

> Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

>

>

>> On 2/26/06, rifetech@...

>> wrote:

>>

>>> At some point a bridge must be built between the existing

>>> primary forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

>>

>>

>> Current oncology is a wicked disgrace. *With all due respect*, Jim, to

>> build a bridge with an irrational system does not seem workable or

>> logical.

>>

>> BTW, Dr Lorraine Day cured herself of terminal invasive ductile breast

>> cancer and she explains just how she did it at www.drday.com even without

>> the advantage of frequency medicine.

>>

>>

>>

>>> One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years of

>>> training is now obsolete.

>>

>>

>> This is exactly what I have done since my tumor was dx in '98. I refuse

>> their insane protocols that bear no relationship to what causes nor cures

>> cancer.

>>

>> JMHO as well as my experience,

>> ...

>>

[Guest guest]

Some will tell you they are there to " prolong " your life, and their

treatments will add days, months, maybe years to your life, I have seen no

proof of this, when someone recovers or lasts longer than originally

" guessed " at then they think wow this really does work.

I strongly believe that those running things wish to try to balance the

death and birth rates on this planet, and cancer is a great equalizer, and

everyone else can get rich off of it, what a gig.

Terry

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

Luigi,

I do not have a background in psychology, and perhaps some on the list that

do might elaborate more on your experiences.

My personal opinion... I think that many oncologists become somewhat

" demented " after practicing for a certain amount of time. They must

rationalize the horrible consequences of thier treatment. Finding someone

that maintains their health during treatment, that does not suffer,is

frightening. A patient that does what no other patient they have ever

treated with your condition has done. RECOVER is mind altering. Such a

patient makes them stop for a moment in time and face the brutal reality of

what it is they are doing. There is a better way, and they must either

acknowledge it, or erect some defense mechanism to protect their mental

balance. Either that or slip over into extreme guilt, and possibly complete

insanity.

Building a bridge through an association of frequency therapies with the

existing treatment paradigm is absolutely necessary. There are 500,000+ new

cases of serious cancers in the US every year. Only a relative handful of

these people will utilize non medical therapies exclusively to successfully

treat their cancer. It is known from studies that the majority of the rest

will utilize some combination of conventional therapy and non medical

therapies to treat their cancer.

Pulsed fields with chemotherapy are a viable, and evidence supported method

of adjuviant treatment. In the Forrest case, testimony was entered

about how the witnesses' father in law had gone from a PSA of 70 to 4 in 90

days via a combination of B-17 ( a chemotherapy medication ) and an

electrode type of frequency instrument.

Cancer is a 150 billion dollar + industry in the US. There must be a bridge

or acceptance will never occur. When this occurs, time and continued

research will see the eventual development of new instruments and new

protocols to use them. The old methods of treatment will drop away, and be

little more than a historic memory of the past.

Jim Bare

>Such a " bridge " cannot ever be built when dealing with allopaths as

>territorial as those I have met.

>I can recall at least a half dozen screaming fights between me and the

>doctors I went to for a second opinion on my diagnosis of terminal cancer.

>They had noticed that unlike other patients on Gemzar, Carboplatin,

>Iridia and some assorted other " wonder drugs " I was not on a

>wheelchair, and they did not care what I was doing: if they could not

>directly control it they wanted me not to have it to the extent that

>even plain vanilla vitamin E and ascorbic acid were on their " no-no "

list...

>A bridge like the one you suggest would likely have a negative effect

>on a doctor's next vacation, new house or car, so it is an obscenity no

>allopath will even allow.

>Luigi

>

>

>

>

> Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

>

>

>> On 2/26/06, rifetech@...

>>

>> wrote:

>>

>>> At some point a bridge must be built between the existing primary

>>> forms of cancer treatment and frequency therapies.

>>

>>

>> Current oncology is a wicked disgrace. *With all due respect*, Jim,

>> to build a bridge with an irrational system does not seem workable or

>> logical.

>>

>> BTW, Dr Lorraine Day cured herself of terminal invasive ductile

>> breast cancer and she explains just how she did it at www.drday.com

>> even without the advantage of frequency medicine.

>>

>>

>>

>>> One is not going to go up to an oncologist and tell them their years

>>> of training is now obsolete.

>>

>>

>> This is exactly what I have done since my tumor was dx in '98. I

>> refuse their insane protocols that bear no relationship to what

>> causes nor cures cancer.

>>

>> JMHO as well as my experience,

>> ...

>>

>>

>>

[Guest guest]

,

Chemotherapy is just a short way of saying treatment of cancer by chemical

means.

Laetrile is a form of chemotherapy. It releases a form of cyanide inside

the cell to kill it. It is toxic in high doses . Herbs used specifically

for their anti cancer properties ( chemical compounds ) can also be

considered as a form of chemotherapy. This includes all the herbal salve

escharotics, the liquid preparations such as Essiac, and all the other

herbal cancer remedies. All herbal's with anti cancer properties are

cellular toxins of some sort. They all kill cancer cells .

I can recall one other person with prostate cancer that did well with the

use of Laetrile and a pulsed field ( R/B ) instrument.

About 1500 people a day here in the US are being diagnosed with a serious

form of cancer. If one figures the working day between the East and West

Coasts is 12 hours, then that works out to two people a minute being told

they have a serious form of cancer. In the past three hours, 360 people

have had some very bad news. All will be told they need at least one, if

not all three ,of the CBP triad. A fourth option that fits with existing

three can help limit the carnage that occurs both from treatment successes

and treatment failures.

We who use and promote, naturally based therapies and health care, are up

against very large, international in scope, dynamic and powerful

foe. Saving the life of a person here or there through purely natural

means is important. We need a way to work towards saving the life of 120

people an hour. We cannot do this without the assistance of the existing

infrastructure. There is a group of oncologists that are open to change,

they even have an association and hold a few conferences yearly. It is the

Society for Integrative Oncology ( SIO) http://www.integrativeonc.org/

Jim Bare

At 08:56 AM 2/27/2006 -0800, you wrote:

>Hi,

>

> Excuse me if I'm wrong but I believe B-17 is laetrile and not a

> chemotherapy treatment.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Check out my web site www.fmswellness.com and click icon Energy Wellness

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

,

Chemotherapy is just a short way of saying treatment of cancer by chemical

means.

Laetrile is a form of chemotherapy. It releases a form of cyanide inside

the cell to kill it. It is toxic in high doses . Herbs used specifically

for their anti cancer properties ( chemical compounds ) can also be

considered as a form of chemotherapy. This includes all the herbal salve

escharotics, the liquid preparations such as Essiac, and all the other

herbal cancer remedies. All herbal's with anti cancer properties are

cellular toxins of some sort. They all kill cancer cells .

I can recall one other person with prostate cancer that did well with the

use of Laetrile and a pulsed field ( R/B ) instrument.

About 1500 people a day here in the US are being diagnosed with a serious

form of cancer. If one figures the working day between the East and West

Coasts is 12 hours, then that works out to two people a minute being told

they have a serious form of cancer. In the past three hours, 360 people

have had some very bad news. All will be told they need at least one, if

not all three ,of the CBP triad. A fourth option that fits with existing

three can help limit the carnage that occurs both from treatment successes

and treatment failures.

We who use and promote, naturally based therapies and health care, are up

against very large, international in scope, dynamic and powerful

foe. Saving the life of a person here or there through purely natural

means is important. We need a way to work towards saving the life of 120

people an hour. We cannot do this without the assistance of the existing

infrastructure. There is a group of oncologists that are open to change,

they even have an association and hold a few conferences yearly. It is the

Society for Integrative Oncology ( SIO) http://www.integrativeonc.org/

Jim Bare

At 08:56 AM 2/27/2006 -0800, you wrote:

>Hi,

>

> Excuse me if I'm wrong but I believe B-17 is laetrile and not a

> chemotherapy treatment.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Clovers, latrile (Vit b 17) sheppards purse, etc are

all " chemotheraphy " . Chemeo comes from the word chemical, and all

biological systems contain chemicals.

[Guest guest]

I suppose that drinking water, a chemical could be considered chemotherapy. On

the other hand, the word chemotherapy in common use refers to the use of

cytotoxic (poisonous to cells) drugs used to treat cancer.

Loyd

http://www.royalrife.com

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

Clovers, latrile (Vit b 17) sheppards purse, etc are

all " chemotheraphy " . Chemeo comes from the word chemical, and all

biological systems contain chemicals.

[Guest guest]

B-17 any side effects?

============================

Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

> Hi,

>

> Excuse me if I'm wrong but I believe B-17 is laetrile and not a

> chemotherapy treatment.

>

>

[Guest guest]

But when someone tells me they're going through " chemo " I know

for sure it's not the good stuff. This needs to become obsolete.

But if they did replace it with B17, I could get used to it being

called chemo. I've heard of hospitals using micro-dose chemo.

Do Cancer Treatment Centers of America use this? I like their ads

(very, very few). Sounds like a good place for those that won't

go totally natural.

Bil

PC 1000

M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

http://magpulser.com

Mammoth Lakes, CA

mailto:magpulser@...

m> Clovers, latrile (Vit b 17) sheppards purse, etc are

m> all " chemotheraphy " . Chemeo comes from the word chemical, and all

m> biological systems contain chemicals.

m>

[Guest guest]

I took Laetrile (B-17) when I was in the hospital in Mexico and I not anyone

there had any problems what so ever.

It was quite effective I am cancer free and its 11 yrs now.

Larry

On 2/28/2006 11:12:04 PM, rife wrote:

> B-17 any side effects?

> ============================

> Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

>

>

> > Hi,

> >

> > Excuse me if I'm wrong but I believe B-17 is laetrile and not a

> > chemotherapy treatment.

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

My wife was very impressed by them and their caring, alas our insurance

didn't cover them

Terry

Re: Re: stage IV metastasized breast cancer

But when someone tells me they're going through " chemo " I know for sure it's

not the good stuff. This needs to become obsolete.

But if they did replace it with B17, I could get used to it being called

chemo. I've heard of hospitals using micro-dose chemo.

Do Cancer Treatment Centers of America use this? I like their ads (very,

very few). Sounds like a good place for those that won't go totally natural.

Bil

PC 1000

M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

http://magpulser.com

Mammoth Lakes, CA

mailto:magpulser@...

m> Clovers, latrile (Vit b 17) sheppards purse, etc are all

m> " chemotheraphy " . Chemeo comes from the word chemical, and all

m> biological systems contain chemicals.

m>