Senate inaction jeopardizes unemployment benefits

[Guest guest]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100226/ap_on_go_co/us_unemployment_benefits

Senate inaction jeopardizes unemployment benefits

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer Ohlemacher, Associated

Press Writer

2 hrs 30 mins ago

WASHINGTON – The Senate failed Friday to extend programs for laid-off workers,

jeopardizing unemployment benefits scheduled to expire over the weekend.

The benefits are part of a larger package of government programs, from highway

funding to loans for small businesses, set to expire Sunday because senators

couldn't agree on how to pay to keep them going.

The House passed a bill Thursday extending the programs for one month while

lawmakers consider how to address the issues long-term. Senate Democrats

repeatedly tried to follow suit Thursday night and Friday morning, but they

couldn't overcome the objections of a single lawmaker, Republican Sen. Jim

Bunning of Kentucky, that the $10 billion bill would add to the budget deficit.

The bill would extend unemployment payments to laid-off workers and provide them

with subsidies to help pay health premiums through the COBRA program. It would

extend funding for highway projects and spare doctors from a 21 percent cut in

Medicare payments. It would extend a small business loan program, the National

Flood Insurance Program and the copyright license used by satellite television

providers.

Senators said more than a million rural television viewers would not be able to

watch local stations on their satellite systems without an extension.

The dispute leaves the programs in limbo as the Senate struggles to overcome

partisan bickering over a budget deficit projected to hit a record $1.56

trillion this year. Democrats are eager to address unemployment, with the

jobless rate just under 10 percent and congressional elections looming in

November. Some Republicans, however, are not eager to accommodate.

At issue are the several tiers of unemployment insurance available to workers

whose initial 26 weeks of benefits have expired. The federal government funds

several types of extensions for people who have been jobless for longer than

that.

The cutoff wouldn't affect most people already receiving extended benefits, said

Maurice Emsellem of the National Employment Law Project. Instead, people seeking

to obtain benefit extensions would not be able to obtain them. It's also an

administrative nightmare for state labor departments.

About 1.1 million people could lose benefits in the unlikely event the impasse

lasts through March.

With most senators already home for the weekend, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., tried

Friday morning to have the bill passed on a voice vote, which can be blocked by

the objection of a single senator. Bunning objected, as he has repeatedly since

Thursday.

" Everybody in this chamber wants to extend unemployment benefits, COBRA health

care benefits, " Bunning said Friday. But, he added, " If we can't find $10

billion somewhere for a bill that everybody in this body supports, we will never

pay for anything. "

Durbin said the nation's economic problems justify borrowing to pay for the

programs. He noted that Congress, with Republican support, has extended the

benefits in the past without offsetting the costs.

" I believe it is unthinkable, unforgivable that we would cut off unemployment

insurance payments to these people, " Durbin said. Addressing Bunning, he said,

" Find a way to express your political views that's not at the expense of these

people. "

The Senate does not have any roll-call votes scheduled before Tuesday, though

Democratic leaders said they would continue trying to persuade Bunning to lift

his objection, allowing the bill to pass without a recorded vote. To avoid an

interruption in benefits, senators would have to act quickly when they return, a

task made difficult by Senate rules that let a single senator slow the process.

Bunning vowed to fight the extensions as long as they add to the deficit, though

he acknowledged they likely will pass eventually.