Guest guest Posted April 4, 2010 Report Share Posted April 4, 2010 http://www.milforddailynews.com/features/x905414116/-Odgren-Is-he-a-criminal Odgren: Is he a criminal? By Norman /Daily News staff The MetroWest Daily News Posted Apr 03, 2010 @ 11:56 PM On Jan. 19, 2007, authorities say Odgren walked into a bathroom at Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School and repeatedly stabbed Alenson, killing the 15-year-old boy. And now, more than three years later, jurors will have to decide if Odgren maliciously murdered, or if his psychological problems made him not legally responsible for the murder. Jury selection begins in Odgren's murder trial on Tuesday. He is charged with first-degree murder. Authorities say at about 7 a.m. on the day of the murder, Odgren, 19 and of Princeton, went into the bathroom and encountered Alenson, a freshman. They were strangers. Odgren used a large knife and stabbed the boy in the abdomen, the heart and the neck, they say. When police got to the school, Odgren said, " I did it. I did it, " and that " I don't want him to die, " when talking about Alenson, authorities said. Odgren's lawyer, Shapiro, said his client has Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism, as well as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Odgren, then 16, was arraigned that day in Framingham District Court. He was ordered held without bail, and he was sent to a juvenile detention facility in Plymouth. It is there where Odgren was recorded on a phone speaking to friends and family members, mainly about his reading habits and books he was trying to write. He also spoke about the case, saying he never knew Alenson, and also denied killing him to different people. Shapiro filed a motion to inform the prosecutors that he planned on a defense based on the lack of criminal responsibility due to mental defect. Prosecutors then sought to use the recordings made at the detention facility as possible evidence to debunk that Odgren was not criminally responsible. That led to a nearly year long slowdown in the case. A Middlesex Superior Court judge twice blocked prosecutors from using the tapes, saying they obtained them improperly. The Middlesex District Attorney's office appealed the decision, and the appeal reached the state Supreme Judicial Court in April 2009. In October 2009, the court ruled that prosecutors obtained the tapes improperly, but still had a right to them and sent the matter back to superior court to determine if they could use them at trial. In February, Shapiro and prosecutor argued during a two-day hearing on a motion to throw out the tapes. Shapiro argued Odgren's constitutional right to privacy was violated, as was the right of a teenager to have private conversations with his parents. He also had experts testify during the hearing that a juvenile's brain was not fully developed and they would be more likely to make impulsive decisions, such as agreeing to speak on recorded phones. On Thursday, Judge S. Jane Haggerty ruled that the tapes can be admitted at trial. That sets up a trial that is expected to last about four weeks. Haggerty said prosecutors had a " significant " witness list, while Odgren is expected to have at least three expert witnesses testify about criminal responsibility and another to testify about Asperger's syndrome. Odgren's parents are also expected to testify. Tomorrow, the final hearing before trial is scheduled. The hearing is meant to mainly deal with jury selection issues. Haggerty also has not ruled on several other motions. Jury selection is scheduled to begin Tuesday. If Odgren is convicted of first-degree murder, he would be sentenced to prison for life without the chance of parole. Norman can be reached at or nmiller@.... Copyright 2010 The Milford Daily News. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.