Guest guest Posted January 6, 2006 Report Share Posted January 6, 2006 FYI… S.C. News Brief If you need more information on this subject, call the listed Press Officer. For Release: (Washington, D.C. -- Friday, January 6, 2006) Gulf Water Sampling Results Contact: Eryn Witcher, / witcher.eryn@... Test results from Gulf of Mexico sampling indicate that at most, relatively low levels of fecal contamination were present after the hurricane. The Clostridium perfringens tests show that the levels were low to undetectable. Previously released enterococcus tests show that at the time of sampling the water was appropriate for any kind of recreational use--including swimming. Water samples were collected by the OSV Bold in the Gulf from Sept. 27 through Oct. 2, 2005 at monitoring stations in the river channels and nearshore waters surrounding the Mississippi Delta. The agency monitored 20 areas to determine whether fecal pollution from flooded communities had spread into these waters. Clostridium perfringens is a bacterium, found in the intestinal tract of both humans and animals. It enters the environment through feces. There are no EPA health-based ambient water quality criteria for C. perfringens. Therefore, there is no approved analytical method for assessing water quality using this bacterium. However, some scientists recommend using C. perfringens spores as a tracer of fecal pollution because its presence is a good indicator of recent or past fecal contamination in water and spores survive well beyond the typical life-span of other fecal bacteria. EPA previously released results for enterococcus, which was detected at four of 20 stations from 10 to 53.1 bacteria colonies per 100 milliliters. These results indicate that the water is suitable for any kind of recreational use. This level is below the most conservative marine water criteria of 104 bacteria per 100 milliliters. It is difficult, due to absence of previously analyzed data, to determine the source of the C. perfringens and enterococci. They could have been present prior to the hurricane. Bacteria were not routinely analyzed prior to Hurricane Katrina. While all of these results are encouraging for recreational uses, this data should not be used to assess the safety of consuming raw or undercooked molluscan shellfish--such as oysters--because accidental ingestion of water presents different risks than eating raw or undercooked shellfish. The data being released today is available at: http://www.epa.gov/katrina/testresults/water/index.html#surface and information about EPA's survey vessel the Bold is available at: http://www.epa.gov/bold R004 You can update or cancel your subscription at any time. You need only your e-mail address (and your password if you have selected one). This service is provided free of charge by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If you have any questions or problems about this service, please contact help@... for assistance. Sent by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20460 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2006 Report Share Posted January 7, 2006 While I accept the Gulf was relatively safe the problem I thought was in the flooded township? The dilution factor of a sea should I hope make it relativeley safe especially as sewage is dumped into the sea on a daily basis. Jeff Charlton London ________________________________ From: iequality on behalf of Stacey Champion Sent: Fri 06/01/2006 21:31 To: iequality Subject: FW: News Brief: Gulf Water Sampling Results FYI... S.C. News Brief If you need more information on this subject, call the listed Press Officer. For Release: (Washington, D.C. -- Friday, January 6, 2006) Gulf Water Sampling Results Contact: Eryn Witcher, / witcher.eryn@... Test results from Gulf of Mexico sampling indicate that at most, relatively low levels of fecal contamination were present after the hurricane. The Clostridium perfringens tests show that the levels were low to undetectable. Previously released enterococcus tests show that at the time of sampling the water was appropriate for any kind of recreational use--including swimming. Water samples were collected by the OSV Bold in the Gulf from Sept. 27 through Oct. 2, 2005 at monitoring stations in the river channels and nearshore waters surrounding the Mississippi Delta. The agency monitored 20 areas to determine whether fecal pollution from flooded communities had spread into these waters. Clostridium perfringens is a bacterium, found in the intestinal tract of both humans and animals. It enters the environment through feces. There are no EPA health-based ambient water quality criteria for C. perfringens. Therefore, there is no approved analytical method for assessing water quality using this bacterium. However, some scientists recommend using C. perfringens spores as a tracer of fecal pollution because its presence is a good indicator of recent or past fecal contamination in water and spores survive well beyond the typical life-span of other fecal bacteria. EPA previously released results for enterococcus, which was detected at four of 20 stations from 10 to 53.1 bacteria colonies per 100 milliliters. These results indicate that the water is suitable for any kind of recreational use. This level is below the most conservative marine water criteria of 104 bacteria per 100 milliliters. It is difficult, due to absence of previously analyzed data, to determine the source of the C. perfringens and enterococci. They could have been present prior to the hurricane. Bacteria were not routinely analyzed prior to Hurricane Katrina. While all of these results are encouraging for recreational uses, this data should not be used to assess the safety of consuming raw or undercooked molluscan shellfish--such as oysters--because accidental ingestion of water presents different risks than eating raw or undercooked shellfish. The data being released today is available at: http://www.epa.gov/katrina/testresults/water/index.html#surface <http://www.epa.gov/katrina/testresults/water/index.html#surface> and information about EPA's survey vessel the Bold is available at: http://www.epa.gov/bold <http://www.epa.gov/bold> R004 <http://service.govdelivery.com/service/edition.html?code=USAEPA_26 & format=Web & e\ mail_type=bulletin> You can update or cancel your subscription at any time <https://www.govdocs.com/service/user.html?code=USAEPA> . You need only your e-mail address (and your password if you have selected one). This service is provided free of charge by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If you have any questions or problems about this service, please contact help@... for assistance. Sent by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20460 FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.