Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 >> Before you entangle yourselves with the ACLU, take a good >>look at its pedigree and the causes it has, and continues to, >>promote : Jesus said " by their fruits ye shall know them. " Right Gordon, like when the ACLU joined with Conservatives to stop national ID cards. And to stop airlines from datamining airline passengers info (CAPPS II). Or joined with conservatives to fight the Patriot Act. And the FCC push for radio monopolies. And innumerable times when Conservatives have ranted and railed like banshees against the ACLU but were the first in line to ask for its help when they found themselves getting the short end of the stick...and got help... Because there are many of us here, Gordon, who put up with all your ranting and raving and total BS and are still here holding our noses and still trying our best to work with you for the common good. So stop bitching and start helping. And writes: >It was only recently that I learned how the public schools >are being used as a vehicle to usher in the new world order. Uh, , hate to break this to you, but the phrase " New World Order " is one of the main ideas of both Presidents Bushes, both good Republicans that I am guessing you voted for. If you don't love the New World Order, then why did you vote it into the Presidency, the Senate, and Congress, and now (indirectly) the Supreme Court? Stop complaining about what you helped do to us. When you find yourself in a hole, then stop digging. And if you don't like the New World Order, then stop voting it into office. Tom http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north342.html In 1990, conservatives were more likely to recognize this vision of world transformation as being at odds with the American Constitutional tradition of limited government. Conservatives today apparently no longer have qualms about a President who commits the nation's resources to the creation of a new world order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Great points, Tom! Those of you who like to read will want get Wendell Berry's newest book, " The Way of Ignorance " . (He's not for it, just observing it.) It shows in detail how the New World Order has been visited upon us by both Republicans and Democrats and the ways it has devastated farm life. He also has some great solutions that are predicated on our work at local levels. Every good rebellion begins this way! Tom Chapin wrote: > >> Before you entangle yourselves with the ACLU, take a good > >>look at its pedigree and the causes it has, and continues to, > >>promote : Jesus said " by their fruits ye shall know them. " > > Right Gordon, like when the ACLU joined with Conservatives to stop > national ID cards. And to stop airlines from datamining airline > passengers info (CAPPS II). Or joined with conservatives to fight the > Patriot Act. And the FCC push for radio monopolies. And innumerable > times when Conservatives have ranted and railed like banshees against > the ACLU but were the first in line to ask for its help when they found > themselves getting the short end of the stick...and got help... > > Because there are many of us here, Gordon, who put up with all your > ranting and raving and total BS and are still here holding our noses and > still trying our best to work with you for the common good. So stop > bitching and start helping. > > And writes: > >It was only recently that I learned how the public schools > >are being used as a vehicle to usher in the new world order. > > Uh, , hate to break this to you, but the phrase " New World Order " > is one of the main ideas of both Presidents Bushes, both good > Republicans that I am guessing you voted for. If you don't love the New > World Order, then why did you vote it into the Presidency, the Senate, > and Congress, and now (indirectly) the Supreme Court? > > Stop complaining about what you helped do to us. When you find yourself > in a hole, then stop digging. And if you don't like the New World > Order, then stop voting it into office. > > Tom > > http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north342.html > In 1990, conservatives were more likely to recognize this vision of > world transformation as being at odds with the American Constitutional > tradition of limited government. Conservatives today apparently no > longer have qualms about a President who commits the nation's resources > to the creation of a new world order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Gordon expostulates: >Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that >the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to ... .... to force their religion down the throats of others and show their own attitude of moral superiority? Eh, Gordon? No, Gordon, I simply note that the non-Christians (and the real Christians here as opposed to the self-publicizing ones) do not feel the need to constantly parade their religion in front of everyone else. Because the non-Christians (and the real Christians) have both read the Bible instead of simply trying to thump people over the head with it, and they can read and understand the Parable of the Pharisee and the Publican, and realize that the depth of one's religion is in inverse relationship to one's tendency to shout it at others: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2018:11-14; & version=9; >the ACLU started out and still is a communist front. Total BS. We on the Left got rid of all our Communists decades ago. We gave them to you, and you accepted Communism in the form of the Neo-Cons right into your hearts and legislatures. The few real, genuine Conservatives remaining know all too well the sordid story of how the Trotskyist Communists became disenchanted with the Left and first tried to become "Scoop" Democrats, and when they didn't get anywhere, they joined the Reagan Administration as Neo-Conservatives. All you have to do is ask one of the few actual unbought Conservatives left in the House, Texas Congressman Ron : http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/neo-conned.htm "... the modern-day neocons have come from the far left, a group historically identified as former Trotskyists. " >One of the main tenets of communism is the elimination of >private property. Which is why the Neo-Con Bush Administration, elected by Conservative dupes is doing everything it can to eliminate private property (by pushing NAIS, NAFTA, CAFTA, SHAFTA)...where all property will be owned by corporations and merely rented to us. And what is not real property will be converted to "intellectual property" in the form of patents and copyrights. You haven't a clue who is supporting liberty and who has conned (neo-conned) you into supporting your own slavery. Which is why raw milk is in trouble. You can't have freedom when you insist on voting in the very people who are taking away your freedom just because they call themselves Republicans or Conservatives. If you can't do the research to see them for who they are, then you deserve the slavery you are voting for. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Thank you for this post Tom. Regardless of what a person's beliefs are with regard to religion and abortion rights, the ACLU is there to defend the rights of the American People......period. The NAIS violates the rights of the American people and if the ACLU receives enough letters, they will help. That is the only reason I have posted the info about them. This group is not interested in anything but maintaining our farms and providing and consuming raw dairy which will become impossible if the government is allowed to tell us what to do with our land and animals. K.C. Re: Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Gordon expostulates: >Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that >the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to ... .... to force their religion down the throats of others and show their own attitude of moral superiority? Eh, Gordon? No, Gordon, I simply note that the non-Christians (and the real Christians here as opposed to the self-publicizing ones) do not feel the need to constantly parade their religion in front of everyone else. Because the non-Christians (and the real Christians) have both read the Bible instead of simply trying to thump people over the head with it, and they can read and understand the Parable of the Pharisee and the Publican, and realize that the depth of one's religion is in inverse relationship to one's tendency to shout it at others: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2018:11-14; & version=9; >the ACLU started out and still is a communist front. Total BS. We on the Left got rid of all our Communists decades ago. We gave them to you, and you accepted Communism in the form of the Neo-Cons right into your hearts and legislatures. The few real, genuine Conservatives remaining know all too well the sordid story of how the Trotskyist Communists became disenchanted with the Left and first tried to become "Scoop" Democrats, and when they didn't get anywhere, they joined the Reagan Administration as Neo-Conservatives. All you have to do is ask one of the few actual unbought Conservatives left in the House, Texas Congressman Ron : http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/neo-conned.htm "... the modern-day neocons have come from the far left, a group historically identified as former Trotskyists. " >One of the main tenets of communism is the elimination of >private property. Which is why the Neo-Con Bush Administration, elected by Conservative dupes is doing everything it can to eliminate private property (by pushing NAIS, NAFTA, CAFTA, SHAFTA)...where all property will be owned by corporations and merely rented to us. And what is not real property will be converted to "intellectual property" in the form of patents and copyrights. You haven't a clue who is supporting liberty and who has conned (neo-conned) you into supporting your own slavery. Which is why raw milk is in trouble. You can't have freedom when you insist on voting in the very people who are taking away your freedom just because they call themselves Republicans or Conservatives. If you can't do the research to see them for who they are, then you deserve the slavery you are voting for. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Being that this is a grass roots movement, the more entities you involve the more they notice. Get letters to the local papers, legislators, activists, etc. If nothing else, more people will find out about this secret law. The name of the game is numbers. The more people that know what is going on, the more people you get angry at what it will do and the better chance a grass roots movement has of succeeding. K.C. Re: Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS >> >> >> Gordon expostulates: >> >Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that >> >the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to ... > > > > > > > > PLEASE BE KIND AND TRIM YOUR POSTS WHEN REPLYING! > Visit our Raw Dairy Files for a wealth of information! > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RawDairy/files/ > > Archive search: http://onibasu.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Ugh! As one who is new to this forum, I am annoyed at the "mud-slinging" and argumentative tone this post has taken. I believe one of the "rules" of this list is to refrain from political debates and it seems that is exactly what this has become. I am here to learn what I can about raw dairy...not to listen to people's views on politics...if I wanted to debate (or listen to such debating) about personal feelings on politics, I would have joined one of those groups... Thank you, Gordon, for having the balls to speak the truth....we need more like you. "I do not ask that Thou should give me some high or noble task. Give me little hands to fold in mine. Give me little children to point Thy way, over the strange, sweet path that leads to You. Give me little voices to teach to pray. Give me shining eyes Thy face to see. The only crown I ask to wear is this, that I may teach my children. I do not ask that I may stand among the wise, the worthy, or the great; I only ask that softly, hand in hand my children and I may enter at the gate." -Anonymous -----Original Message-----From: RawDairy [mailto:RawDairy ]On Behalf Of TinybabeSent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:44 PMTo: RawDairy Subject: Re: Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Thank you for this post Tom. Regardless of what a person's beliefs are with regard to religion and abortion rights, the ACLU is there to defend the rights of the American People......period. The NAIS violates the rights of the American people and if the ACLU receives enough letters, they will help. That is the only reason I have posted the info about them. This group is not interested in anything but maintaining our farms and providing and consuming raw dairy which will become impossible if the government is allowed to tell us what to do with our land and animals. K.C. Re: Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Gordon expostulates: >Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that >the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to ... .... to force their religion down the throats of others and show their own attitude of moral superiority? Eh, Gordon? No, Gordon, I simply note that the non-Christians (and the real Christians here as opposed to the self-publicizing ones) do not feel the need to constantly parade their religion in front of everyone else. Because the non-Christians (and the real Christians) have both read the Bible instead of simply trying to thump people over the head with it, and they can read and understand the Parable of the Pharisee and the Publican, and realize that the depth of one's religion is in inverse relationship to one's tendency to shout it at others: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2018:11-14; & version=9; >the ACLU started out and still is a communist front. Total BS. We on the Left got rid of all our Communists decades ago. We gave them to you, and you accepted Communism in the form of the Neo-Cons right into your hearts and legislatures. The few real, genuine Conservatives remaining know all too well the sordid story of how the Trotskyist Communists became disenchanted with the Left and first tried to become "Scoop" Democrats, and when they didn't get anywhere, they joined the Reagan Administration as Neo-Conservatives. All you have to do is ask one of the few actual unbought Conservatives left in the House, Texas Congressman Ron : http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/neo-conned.htm "... the modern-day neocons have come from the far left, a group historically identified as former Trotskyists. " >One of the main tenets of communism is the elimination of >private property. Which is why the Neo-Con Bush Administration, elected by Conservative dupes is doing everything it can to eliminate private property (by pushing NAIS, NAFTA, CAFTA, SHAFTA)...where all property will be owned by corporations and merely rented to us. And what is not real property will be converted to "intellectual property" in the form of patents and copyrights. You haven't a clue who is supporting liberty and who has conned (neo-conned) you into supporting your own slavery. Which is why raw milk is in trouble. You can't have freedom when you insist on voting in the very people who are taking away your freedom just because they call themselves Republicans or Conservatives. If you can't do the research to see them for who they are, then you deserve the slavery you are voting for. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Mr. Gorden , just wanted you to know that I am in favor of a woman's right to choose abortion or not. So is my son and daughter as well as my parents and brothers and sisters! Have a nice day."Gordon S. " wrote: Exposure of what the ACLU is, is there for those who care to know. I'll give you one quick for-instance. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a judge on the Supreme Court of the United States. She got there after being one of the bright lights with the ACLU as it brought in abortion-on-demand. 4000 unborn Americans are liquidated every business in the country's abortion mills - a calculated genocide for which much credit is due the ACLU. I could go on : but the evidence is there for those who sincerely seek to understand how the American Civil Liberties Union is an "anti-christ" outfit dedicated to destroying America's Christian heritage. Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to assert the God-given right to use and enjoy their own private property. Contrast that with the facts that a] - the ACLU started out and still is a communist front. b] - One of the main tenets of communism is the elimination of private property. I doubt if this forum really wants to go 'way off into the issue, but if you persist, I'll provide the details of the anecdote where the Reproductive Rights fund of the ACLU bribed the Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia, namely Flaherty, to make an order preventing me from accessing the public accounts of the Province. I was just about to prove that the BC abortion mills were grafting tax money back to the governing party. Some may be intrigued with the facts about the wicked heart of the ACLU ... but I get the distinct impression you're not one of them. ___________________________ >> >> Before you entangle yourselves with the ACLU, take a good> >>look at its pedigree and the causes it has, and continues to,> >>promote : Jesus said "by their fruits ye shall know them."> > Right Gordon, like when the ACLU joined with Conservatives to stop> national ID cards. And to stop airlines from datamining airline> passengers info (CAPPS II). Or joined with conservatives to fight the> Patriot Act. And the FCC push for radio monopolies. And innumerable> times when Conservatives have ranted and railed like banshees against> the ACLU but were the first in line to ask for its help when they found> themselves getting the short end of the stick...and got help...> > Because there are many of us here, Gordon, who put up with all your> ranting and raving and total BS and are still here holding our noses and> still trying our best to work with you for the common good. So stop> bitching and start helping.> > And writes:> >It was only recently that I learned how the public schools> >are being used as a vehicle to usher in the new world order.> > Uh, , hate to break this to you, but the phrase "New World Order"> is one of the main ideas of both Presidents Bushes, both good> Republicans that I am guessing you voted for. If you don't love the New> World Order, then why did you vote it into the Presidency, the Senate,> and Congress, and now (indirectly) the Supreme Court?> > Stop complaining about what you helped do to us. When you find yourself> in a hole, then stop digging. And if you don't like the New World> Order, then stop voting it into office.> > Tom> > http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north342.html> In 1990, conservatives were more likely to recognize this vision of> world transformation as being at odds with the American Constitutional> tradition of limited government. Conservatives today apparently no> longer have qualms about a President who commits the nation's resources> to the creation of a new world order.> _______________________ Alpenpässe Chèvres SuissesAlpine Pass Swiss Dairy Goats Naftoli, Efraim, & Ilana Pickard 45201 Carmel Valley road Greenfield, CA 93927 Yahoo! Photos Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 With regard to both of your posts. Thank you for believing in the right of the people to choose and to believe in the right to freedom of expression. That why we all need to fight the NAIS. These rights will be taken away along with our animals and the right to milk them and consume the wonderful food of life they give. So, let's forget the nastiness (it's not worth your time and it's not being heard anyway) and use our energy to write those letters to the newspapers and legislators. K.C. Re: Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Mr. Gorden , just wanted you to know that I am in favor of a woman's right to choose abortion or not. So is my son and daughter as well as my parents and brothers and sisters! Have a nice day."Gordon S. " wrote: Exposure of what the ACLU is, is there for those who care to know. I'll give you one quick for-instance. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a judge on the Supreme Court of the United States. She got there after being one of the bright lights with the ACLU as it brought in abortion-on-demand. 4000 unborn Americans are liquidated every business in the country's abortion mills - a calculated genocide for which much credit is due the ACLU. I could go on : but the evidence is there for those who sincerely seek to understand how the American Civil Liberties Union is an "anti-christ" outfit dedicated to destroying America's Christian heritage. Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to assert the God-given right to use and enjoy their own private property. Contrast that with the facts that a] - the ACLU started out and still is a communist front. b] - One of the main tenets of communism is the elimination of private property. I doubt if this forum really wants to go 'way off into the issue, but if you persist, I'll provide the details of the anecdote where the Reproductive Rights fund of the ACLU bribed the Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia, namely Flaherty, to make an order preventing me from accessing the public accounts of the Province. I was just about to prove that the BC abortion mills were grafting tax money back to the governing party. Some may be intrigued with the facts about the wicked heart of the ACLU ... but I get the distinct impression you're not one of them. ___________________________ >> >> Before you entangle yourselves with the ACLU, take a good> >>look at its pedigree and the causes it has, and continues to,> >>promote : Jesus said "by their fruits ye shall know them."> > Right Gordon, like when the ACLU joined with Conservatives to stop> national ID cards. And to stop airlines from datamining airline> passengers info (CAPPS II). Or joined with conservatives to fight the> Patriot Act. And the FCC push for radio monopolies. And innumerable> times when Conservatives have ranted and railed like banshees against> the ACLU but were the first in line to ask for its help when they found> themselves getting the short end of the stick...and got help...> > Because there are many of us here, Gordon, who put up with all your> ranting and raving and total BS and are still here holding our noses and> still trying our best to work with you for the common good. So stop> bitching and start helping.> > And writes:> >It was only recently that I learned how the public schools> >are being used as a vehicle to usher in the new world order.> > Uh, , hate to break this to you, but the phrase "New World Order"> is one of the main ideas of both Presidents Bushes, both good> Republicans that I am guessing you voted for. If you don't love the New> World Order, then why did you vote it into the Presidency, the Senate,> and Congress, and now (indirectly) the Supreme Court?> > Stop complaining about what you helped do to us. When you find yourself> in a hole, then stop digging. And if you don't like the New World> Order, then stop voting it into office.> > Tom> > http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north342.html> In 1990, conservatives were more likely to recognize this vision of> world transformation as being at odds with the American Constitutional> tradition of limited government. Conservatives today apparently no> longer have qualms about a President who commits the nation's resources> to the creation of a new world order.> _______________________ Alpenpässe Chèvres SuissesAlpine Pass Swiss Dairy Goats Naftoli, Efraim, & Ilana Pickard 45201 Carmel Valley road Greenfield, CA 93927 Yahoo! PhotosRing in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Since this is not goat or goat milk related, for those of us who, as Christians, oppose abortion, could we drop this kind of discussion please. Thanks, Noah Re: Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Mr. Gorden , just wanted you to know that I am in favor of a woman's right to choose abortion or not. So is my son and daughter as well as my parents and brothers and sisters! Have a nice day."Gordon S. " wrote: Exposure of what the ACLU is, is there for those who care to know. I'll give you one quick for-instance. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a judge on the Supreme Court of the United States. She got there after being one of the bright lights with the ACLU as it brought in abortion-on-demand. 4000 unborn Americans are liquidated every business in the country's abortion mills - a calculated genocide for which much credit is due the ACLU. I could go on : but the evidence is there for those who sincerely seek to understand how the American Civil Liberties Union is an "anti-christ" outfit dedicated to destroying America's Christian heritage. Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to assert the God-given right to use and enjoy their own private property. Contrast that with the facts that a] - the ACLU started out and still is a communist front. b] - One of the main tenets of communism is the elimination of private property. I doubt if this forum really wants to go 'way off into the issue, but if you persist, I'll provide the details of the anecdote where the Reproductive Rights fund of the ACLU bribed the Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia, namely Flaherty, to make an order preventing me from accessing the public accounts of the Province. I was just about to prove that the BC abortion mills were grafting tax money back to the governing party. Some may be intrigued with the facts about the wicked heart of the ACLU ... but I get the distinct impression you're not one of them. ___________________________ >> >> Before you entangle yourselves with the ACLU, take a good> >>look at its pedigree and the causes it has, and continues to,> >>promote : Jesus said "by their fruits ye shall know them."> > Right Gordon, like when the ACLU joined with Conservatives to stop> national ID cards. And to stop airlines from datamining airline> passengers info (CAPPS II). Or joined with conservatives to fight the> Patriot Act. And the FCC push for radio monopolies. And innumerable> times when Conservatives have ranted and railed like banshees against> the ACLU but were the first in line to ask for its help when they found> themselves getting the short end of the stick...and got help...> > Because there are many of us here, Gordon, who put up with all your> ranting and raving and total BS and are still here holding our noses and> still trying our best to work with you for the common good. So stop> bitching and start helping.> > And writes:> >It was only recently that I learned how the public schools> >are being used as a vehicle to usher in the new world order.> > Uh, , hate to break this to you, but the phrase "New World Order"> is one of the main ideas of both Presidents Bushes, both good> Republicans that I am guessing you voted for. If you don't love the New> World Order, then why did you vote it into the Presidency, the Senate,> and Congress, and now (indirectly) the Supreme Court?> > Stop complaining about what you helped do to us. When you find yourself> in a hole, then stop digging. And if you don't like the New World> Order, then stop voting it into office.> > Tom> > http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north342.html> In 1990, conservatives were more likely to recognize this vision of> world transformation as being at odds with the American Constitutional> tradition of limited government. Conservatives today apparently no> longer have qualms about a President who commits the nation's resources> to the creation of a new world order.> _______________________ Alpenpässe Chèvres SuissesAlpine Pass Swiss Dairy Goats Naftoli, Efraim, & Ilana Pickard 45201 Carmel Valley road Greenfield, CA 93927 Yahoo! PhotosRing in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 You know, I just have to say, for whatever it's worth, that I thought this was a forum to talk about and learn about raw dairy and all its elements. I never for a minute thought it was a religious/political group; and I am both astounded and offended here. Whether most here are or are not Christians is not the point, and it's my feeling that these issues are totally out of place in a group such as this. Our country is not based on a Christian heritage; it's based on freedom of and freedom from religion, and I just cannot believe what I am hearing! MA Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Exposure of what the ACLU is, is there for those who care to know. I'll give you one quick for-instance. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a judge on the Supreme Court of the United States. She got there after being one of the bright lights with the ACLU as it brought in abortion-on-demand. 4000 unborn Americans are liquidated every business in the country's abortion mills - a calculated genocide for which much credit is due the ACLU. I could go on : but the evidence is there for those who sincerely seek to understand how the American Civil Liberties Union is an "anti-christ" outfit dedicated to destroying America's Christian heritage. Pay attention to the posts, Mr. Chapin, and you'll have to admit that the majority of members of this forum are Christians who want to assert the God-given right to use and enjoy their own private property. Contrast that with the facts that a] - the ACLU started out and still is a communist front. b] - One of the main tenets of communism is the elimination of private property. I doubt if this forum really wants to go 'way off into the issue, but if you persist, I'll provide the details of the anecdote where the Reproductive Rights fund of the ACLU bribed the Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia, namely Flaherty, to make an order preventing me from accessing the public accounts of the Province. I was just about to prove that the BC abortion mills were grafting tax money back to the governing party. Some may be intrigued with the facts about the wicked heart of the ACLU ... but I get the distinct impression you're not one of them. ___________________________ >> >> Before you entangle yourselves with the ACLU, take a good> >>look at its pedigree and the causes it has, and continues to,> >>promote : Jesus said "by their fruits ye shall know them."> > Right Gordon, like when the ACLU joined with Conservatives to stop> national ID cards. And to stop airlines from datamining airline> passengers info (CAPPS II). Or joined with conservatives to fight the> Patriot Act. And the FCC push for radio monopolies. And innumerable> times when Conservatives have ranted and railed like banshees against> the ACLU but were the first in line to ask for its help when they found> themselves getting the short end of the stick...and got help...> > Because there are many of us here, Gordon, who put up with all your> ranting and raving and total BS and are still here holding our noses and> still trying our best to work with you for the common good. So stop> bitching and start helping.> > And writes:> >It was only recently that I learned how the public schools> >are being used as a vehicle to usher in the new world order.> > Uh, , hate to break this to you, but the phrase "New World Order"> is one of the main ideas of both Presidents Bushes, both good> Republicans that I am guessing you voted for. If you don't love the New> World Order, then why did you vote it into the Presidency, the Senate,> and Congress, and now (indirectly) the Supreme Court?> > Stop complaining about what you helped do to us. When you find yourself> in a hole, then stop digging. And if you don't like the New World> Order, then stop voting it into office.> > Tom> > http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north342.html> In 1990, conservatives were more likely to recognize this vision of> world transformation as being at odds with the American Constitutional> tradition of limited government. Conservatives today apparently no> longer have qualms about a President who commits the nation's resources> to the creation of a new world order.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 I have a feeling people will quit this group if discussions are allowed to keep on and on about Nais which i feel is way off topic. I have quit other great groups because of large amounts of e-mail messages. Just my little bity opinion. "Gordon S. " wrote: This forum is not about the morality of executing Persons unborn. Do us the minimum courtesy of reading the thread so as to understand the issue = a proposal for antiNAIS people to call on the ACLU. What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Where do you'all think raw dairy "milk" comes from? farm animals!!! Bea Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Yea, it is a tough call, . NAIS seems to be a bit on topic becauseraw dairy involves cows and privacy etc. But I do understand your frustrationwhen you aren't interested in a topic and it seems to go on and on. Perhaps we will do a bit more on NAIS and then ask folks to just post something ifthere is any updates or changes or movement on it. It is getting a bit tedious.:-) D.moderator> This forum is not about the morality of executing Persons unborn. > Do us the minimum courtesy of reading the thread so as to understand the issue = a proposal for antiNAIS people to call on the ACLU. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 And you wonder why the government keeps steamrolling over our rights. I sure hope people wake up to the fact that this is going to affect every thing you eat, drink and even clothing you buy down the road if this isn't stopped. K.C. Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Yea, it is a tough call, . NAIS seems to be a bit on topic becauseraw dairy involves cows and privacy etc. But I do understand your frustrationwhen you aren't interested in a topic and it seems to go on and on. Perhaps we will do a bit more on NAIS and then ask folks to just post something ifthere is any updates or changes or movement on it. It is getting a bit tedious.:-) D.moderator> This forum is not about the morality of executing Persons unborn. > Do us the minimum courtesy of reading the thread so as to understand the issue = a proposal for antiNAIS people to call on the ACLU. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Bea is correct, milk comes from farm animals. The NAIS discussion may be getting a little tedious but I want you to tell me how tedious it will be when you have to report every movement of every animal on your farm after this insidious program is fully implemented. Most of us won't be able or willing to pay the price or afford the cost of the program let alone be willing to endure the intrusion into our civil liberties. Tedious as it may seem, it is totally MILK related. Everyone had better pay attention. This is not the time to stick your head in the sand. Not wanting to be bothered with the uncomfortable feelings and frustration of the harangue of the discussion is precisely why we are at the point we are at now! When you have to pay an exorbitant fee to the NAIS for the privilege of putting a tag in the ear of every animal and bird on your place with a bar code on it so they can read it from a satellite 200 miles above the earth please don't blame those who are conducting tedious discussions. Thanks, Noah Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Yea, it is a tough call, . NAIS seems to be a bit on topic becauseraw dairy involves cows and privacy etc. But I do understand your frustrationwhen you aren't interested in a topic and it seems to go on and on. Perhaps we will do a bit more on NAIS and then ask folks to just post something ifthere is any updates or changes or movement on it. It is getting a bit tedious.:-) D.moderator> This forum is not about the morality of executing Persons unborn. > Do us the minimum courtesy of reading the thread so as to understand the issue = a proposal for antiNAIS people to call on the ACLU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Noah, you are so right and thank you. I may be a pain in the butt, however, I believe EVERYONE, not just those with the cows, chickens and goats need to address this. YOU ALL have to start writing letters to the paper, legislators and even your dog and cat breed clubs. This has to come from everyone or the people consuming milk that don't think this involves them will end up paying $30 a gallon all over the country. When that happens, you can bet not many people are going to be able to afford raw dairy and the dairies will start selling their cows and then the Monsantos in this this country have won. Please, everyone get up off the couch and don't just answer emails, start writing letters to anyone you can. The more that gets to the papers and legislators the better chance we have to stop this. There are people in this group from all over the country. You all have friends and people you work with. Spread the word. Write one letter and have as many people as you can sign it and send it to your local newspaper. They are publishing my letter, and even though it had to be cut to 500 words, the word is going to get out to the people in at least 5 counties. This is everyone's fight. Not just those of us who have animals. K.C Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Yea, it is a tough call, . NAIS seems to be a bit on topic becauseraw dairy involves cows and privacy etc. But I do understand your frustrationwhen you aren't interested in a topic and it seems to go on and on. Perhaps we will do a bit more on NAIS and then ask folks to just post something ifthere is any updates or changes or movement on it. It is getting a bit tedious.:-) D.moderator> This forum is not about the morality of executing Persons unborn. > Do us the minimum courtesy of reading the thread so as to understand the issue = a proposal for antiNAIS people to call on the ACLU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 You know tedious or not NAIS is lurking.... The US is an overreacting group of people... The take the easiest way out... Cover their ass by making a new stupid law... I believe in checks and balances but tagging every animal is overkill K.C. has taken a very good stance of this issue... It IS something to get upset about it ... let your representatives in government know you aren't going to take this laying down... You keep it up K.C. and I (just like the 60's and 70's) will "carry a protest sign and picket" ... The government is supposed to represent all of us not a selected few... We live in a FREE society and shouldn't be spied on by the Government.... God gave us free will why can't the government.... Nothing wrong about being upset by turns of events that are being destructive.... K.C. I'll carry a sign for you and have already notified my representative Hillary Clinton.... Sandee ~~PEACE~~HippeeSandee Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Yea, it is a tough call, . NAIS seems to be a bit on topic becauseraw dairy involves cows and privacy etc. But I do understand your frustrationwhen you aren't interested in a topic and it seems to go on and on. Perhaps we will do a bit more on NAIS and then ask folks to just post something ifthere is any updates or changes or movement on it. It is getting a bit tedious.:-) D.moderator> This forum is not about the morality of executing Persons unborn. > Do us the minimum courtesy of reading the thread so as to understand the issue = a proposal for antiNAIS people to call on the ACLU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 The point is that we have to have everyone of you on board to stop this thing from going through. I personally live in a state where I can get goats milk but can't get cows milk that is raw. I have my own goats but don't have room for a cow. I don't want to see my ability to have the goats or ability to pay for having them disappear. Annie Tornado Alley GoatsBoers & Nubiansville, AR "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety " Ben lin 1759 IF YOU GOT IT A TRUCKER BROUGHT IT Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS> > > Yea, it is a tough call, . NAIS seems to be a bit on topic because> raw dairy involves cows and privacy etc. But I do understand your frustration> when you aren't interested in a topic and it seems to go on and on. Perhaps > we will do a bit more on NAIS and then ask folks to just post something if> there is any updates or changes or movement on it. It is getting a bit > tedious.> :-)> D.> moderator> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 KC for your information I have always supported for President until she came out for Micro Chipping people. Annie Tornado Alley GoatsBoers & Nubiansville, AR "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety " Ben lin 1759 IF YOU GOT IT A TRUCKER BROUGHT IT Re: antiACLU as well as antiNAIS Yea, it is a tough call, . NAIS seems to be a bit on topic becauseraw dairy involves cows and privacy etc. But I do understand your frustrationwhen you aren't interested in a topic and it seems to go on and on. Perhaps we will do a bit more on NAIS and then ask folks to just post something ifthere is any updates or changes or movement on it. It is getting a bit tedious.:-) D.moderator> This forum is not about the morality of executing Persons unborn. > Do us the minimum courtesy of reading the thread so as to understand the issue = a proposal for antiNAIS people to call on the ACLU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.