Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 , If I were to buy a home and I found it was sealed I would not buy it. Sealing does not tell me it was completed correctly. Furthermore, no one can tell me when the sealant will breakdown. Who owns the problem at that point? Will the sealants become an issue due to chemicals in the near future? Restoring the area to pre-loss condition is no coating when started, no coating when completed. I see most coatings are to cover up what hasn’t been cleaned correctly. And who will know after its been coated? The contractor made good quick money only to become the clients problems later in time (or the new owner’s). I do not allow coating on my projects besides the area is required to be cleaned prior to coating so why coat? Why add another chemical when not necessary? If it’s a moisture problem, doesn’t the S520 and every other document say mitigate the moisture problem? So if the moisture problems is resolved, why coat? Bob/Ma From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of gary rosen Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:49 PM To: iequality Subject: Re: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? I took the AMRT (IICRC) training from Restcon. They did not teach coating. In our experience there are several reasons to coat although we have never used the Anabec product. Wee have used encapsulants from and Design Polymerics. 1.) We do not think this is a valid reason but many people coat because they can charge by the square foot and this is how the can make a good profit margin. 2.) When you encapsulate you know that mold will not grow on that surface even if it gets a little wet. In an attic there is almost always some moisture from sweating AC ducts or whatever. So encapsulation gives you added protection. 3.) When you encapsulate it is easy to provide clearance. If everything is white ... you take a picture and you are clear. (We also require pictures of wood structural members before encapsulation.) Rosen Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage the underlying gyp-board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- michaelsengineering .com) are welcome. TIA. Wane <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax mailto:wab@michaels engineering. com On the web at: http://www.michaels engineering. com " To love what you do and feel that it matters - how could anything be more fun? " - Graham NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Use and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; delete the e-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the information it contains. Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 The first edition of the IICRC's S520 prescribed prison, caning and other acts of retribution for using encapsulants (sealing and coating) on a remediation project. The recently peer reviewed copy of the S520 listed encapsulant usage as a " post-remediation consideration " . An IICRC instructor who teaches sealing? Obviously someone was asleep during class (either the student or the instructor). RR _____ From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of Bob Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:38 PM To: iequality Subject: RE: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? , If I were to buy a home and I found it was sealed I would not buy it. Sealing does not tell me it was completed correctly. Furthermore, no one can tell me when the sealant will breakdown. Who owns the problem at that point? Will the sealants become an issue due to chemicals in the near future? Restoring the area to pre-loss condition is no coating when started, no coating when completed. I see most coatings are to cover up what hasn't been cleaned correctly. And who will know after its been coated? The contractor made good quick money only to become the clients problems later in time (or the new owner's). I do not allow coating on my projects besides the area is required to be cleaned prior to coating so why coat? Why add another chemical when not necessary? If it's a moisture problem, doesn't the S520 and every other document say mitigate the moisture problem? So if the moisture problems is resolved, why coat? Bob/Ma _____ From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of gary rosen Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:49 PM To: iequality Subject: Re: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? I took the AMRT (IICRC) training from Restcon. They did not teach coating. In our experience there are several reasons to coat although we have never used the Anabec product. Wee have used encapsulants from and Design Polymerics. 1.) We do not think this is a valid reason but many people coat because they can charge by the square foot and this is how the can make a good profit margin. 2.) When you encapsulate you know that mold will not grow on that surface even if it gets a little wet. In an attic there is almost always some moisture from sweating AC ducts or whatever. So encapsulation gives you added protection. 3.) When you encapsulate it is easy to provide clearance. If everything is white ... you take a picture and you are clear. (We also require pictures of wood structural members before encapsulation.) Rosen Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage the underlying gyp-board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- michaelsengineering .com) are welcome. TIA. Wane <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax mailto:wab@michaels engineering. com On the web at: <http://www.michaelsengineering.com/> http://www.michaels engineering. com " To love what you do and feel that it matters - how could anything be more fun? " - Graham NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Use and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; delete the e-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the information it contains. _____ Everyone is raving about the <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=45083/*http:/advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbe ta> all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 , How does one separate the " seeing is believing " from the " seeing is deceiving? " Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > > Bob, > > If the client does not like the protocol then they won't hire that > person ... unless of course the cost is much less. Then they probably > will hire them anyway. > > When remediating a large attic space for example ... bleach followed > by encapsulation can reduce the cost of remediation by a huge amount. > Strong bleach removes mold. It does not just kill it like Microban, > MDF-500 etc. > > When remediating a real estate transaction, a picture of the > remediated wall with all the studs completely white because they are > covered with white encapsulant has always resulted in a happy buyer > (in my experience.) Buyers will never understand or trust lab tests > but seeing is believing. > > Rosen > > Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? > Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly > modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The > source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit > located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor > and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in > cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was > visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to > flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage > the underlying gyp- board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed > all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice > blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing > elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and > protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently > returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed > clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor > retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, > etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an > EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA > registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every > surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the > remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training > at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar > persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance > in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your > feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this > way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or > justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using > this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical > compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or > slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior > sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- > michaelsengineering .com) are welcome. TIA. Wane > <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, > Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real > Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, > Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax > mailto:wab@michaels engineering. com On the web at: > > > > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > > > > > > > > > > > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 All, To my knowledge, the EPA has no longer approved nor promoted bleach for use on organic building materials. I understand the use of bleach was only tested and approved for use on stainless steel tables. As for the VOC’s, we don’t know what the VOC will be due to various building materials and their matrix. If I remember correctly, a Canadian study was done a year or two ago (by now) and the study found that the VOC’s that were produced were linked to a carcinogen. The carcinogen was linked to breast cancer in woman. If I also remember correctly, prior to the Canadian study, the EPA use to recommend a 10% bleach solution for mold clean-up. Shortly thereafter most all sites removed the bleach recommendation for clean-up associated with porous materials. Bob/Ma. From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of Larkin Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:08 PM To: iequality Subject: Re: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? WOW, ! When did bleach get an EPA registration for use during mold remediation? What does the manufacturer recommend as a mixing factor for use during a mold project? Or better yet, what is on the product labeling? And strong bleach, what about the new VOC's you are introducing? Larkin, CRMI, WRT ERS Services elires I find that it is not the circumstances in which we are placed, but the spirit in which we face them, that constitutes our comfort. - T. King That's what learning is, after all; not whether we lose the game, but how we lose and how we've changed because of it and what we take away from it that we never had before, to apply to other games. Losing, in a curious way, is winning.- Bach from " The Bridge Across Forever " Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage the underlying gyp-board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- michaelsengineering .com) are welcome. TIA. Wane <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax mailto:wab@michaels engineering. com On the web at: http://www.michaels engineering. com " To love what you do and feel that it matters - how could anything be more fun? " - Graham NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Use and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; delete the e-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the information it contains. Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? Never had IICRC instruction 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior sealer " )? a) No. Possibly. I would worry about a change in vapor perm of the coated areas. I would worry about a fire rating change in any materials covered, especially wiring. I would worry about pealing given the temperature extremes. ....................................................................... " Tony " Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE pH2, LLC PO Box 34140 Indianapolis, IN 46234 off fax cell 90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any consultant can give you the other 10%(SM) This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at . Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of Wane A. Baker Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:41 PM To: iequality Subject: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage the underlying gyp-board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- michaelsengineering.com) are welcome. TIA. Wane <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax mailto:wab@... On the web at: http://www.michaelsengineering.com " To love what you do and feel that it matters - how could anything be more fun? " - Graham NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Use and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; delete the e-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the information it contains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 : You stated: “Strong bleach removes mold. It does not just kill it like Microban, MDF-500 etc.” 1. No . Mechanical forces (solid, liquid, etc.) remove mold. Everything else just changes the structure. And if it has penetrated wood or porous material even that may not be the case. Try some bleach on wood that has basidio or ascomycete hyphae penetrating through cell walls (fibers, ray cells, whatever) – then take a few photomicrgraphs. 2. Many anti-microbials do not “kill”, they just inhibit growth. 3. No agent that I know of is 100% effective [perhaps we could tax the poor organisms]. , I thought the IICRC 500 or 520 define some of the terms (disinfection, sterilization). Perhaps you should review those as well. Tony ....................................................................... " Tony " Havics, CHMM, CIH, PE pH2, LLC PO Box 34140 Indianapolis, IN 46234 off fax cell 90% of Risk Management is knowing where to place the decimal point...any consultant can give you the other 10%(SM) This message is from pH2. This message and any attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information, and are intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute this message and any attachments, and we ask that you please delete this message and attachments (including all copies) and notify the sender by return e-mail or by phone at . Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender, which are not to be attributed to pH2 and may not be copied or distributed without this statement. From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of gary rosen Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 6:35 PM To: iequality Subject: Re: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Bob, If the client does not like the protocol then they won't hire that person ... unless of course the cost is much less. Then they probably will hire them anyway. When remediating a large attic space for example ... bleach followed by encapsulation can reduce the cost of remediation by a huge amount. Strong bleach removes mold. It does not just kill it like Microban, MDF-500 etc. When remediating a real estate transaction, a picture of the remediated wall with all the studs completely white because they are covered with white encapsulant has always resulted in a happy buyer (in my experience.) Buyers will never understand or trust lab tests but seeing is believing. Rosen Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage the underlying gyp-board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- michaelsengineering .com) are welcome. TIA. Wane <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax mailto:wab@michaels engineering. com On the web at: http://www.michaels engineering. com " To love what you do and feel that it matters - how could anything be more fun? " - Graham NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Use and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; delete the e-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the information it contains. Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2006 Report Share Posted December 11, 2006 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? [] $$$$$$$$$$$$ more square feet the more he could justify to charge????? What other reason could there be? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec "Anashield"? Wane, one question to ask is why would you put a product over the antimicrobial, that would isolate the Antimicrobial rendering it ineffective, or it least it seems that way to me.. Another question I would ask, is the coating a vapor barrier, I'd be more worried about stopping summer driven moisture through the roof membrane and affecting the roofing and deck. <but up there in the frozen tundra where you live Wane, that might not be a problem> Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the "organosilane" (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a "latex acrylic resin interior sealer")? This might be a good question to send to the IICRC and see if this is their (tongue in cheek) latest protocol coming out is S520. Actually that's very unfair of me, as most of the people I know that affiliate with the IICRC would not use this practice. Maybe the IICRC needs to find out which of their approved instructors is the dealer for those products to identify where they got their training! Our experience is that remediators spraying coatings is a their way to say "I can't I can't clean it good enough to pass clearance so I'll lock it down". There is a time and a place for coatings but not one over another, over another.... and certainly not wholesale use in today's chemically sensitive world. Wane ask them if they enjoyed doing their first Job! Ron From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of Wane A. BakerSent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:41 PMTo: iequality Subject: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage the underlying gyp-board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec "Anashield"? Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the "organosilane" (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a "latex acrylic resin interior sealer")? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- michaelsengineering.com) are welcome. TIA. Wane <><><><><><><><><><><>Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIHDivision Manager, Indoor Air QualityMICHAELS ENGINEERING"Real Professionals. Real Solutions."811 Monitor Street, Suite 100PO Box 2377La Crosse, Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484Cell Fax mailto:wabmichaelsengineeringOn the web at: http://www.michaelsengineering.com "To love what you do and feel that it matters - how could anything be more fun?"- Graham NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Use and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; delete the e-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the information it contains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 It is to be used on NON-POROUS surfaces. IT is also to be used on PREVIOUSLY CLEANED NON-POROUS surfaces. L. President Indoor Environmental Management, Inc. 10640 Deme Drive Suite J Indianapolis, IN 46236 Fax Re: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Did you ever use Tilex? 50% bleach. For use on mold. Works great. Check the label and MSDS. http://www.thecloroxcompany.com/products/msds/index.html  Rosen Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage the underlying gyp-board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, etc.).  BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ?  Could there be a chemical compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- michaelsengineering ..com) are welcome. TIA. Wane <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax mailto:wab@michaels engineering. com On the web at: http://www.michaels engineering. com " To love what you do and feel that it matters - how could anything be more fun? " - Graham NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Use and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; delete the e-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the information it contains.   -------- Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. -------- Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. -------- Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. -------- Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. ________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2006 Report Share Posted December 12, 2006 Carl, That’s a good one Bob/Ma. From: iequality [mailto:iequality ] On Behalf Of Carl E. Grimes Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:37 PM To: iequality Subject: Re: Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? , How does one separate the " seeing is believing " from the " seeing is deceiving? " Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > > Bob, > > If the client does not like the protocol then they won't hire that > person ... unless of course the cost is much less. Then they probably > will hire them anyway. > > When remediating a large attic space for example ... bleach followed > by encapsulation can reduce the cost of remediation by a huge amount. > Strong bleach removes mold. It does not just kill it like Microban, > MDF-500 etc. > > When remediating a real estate transaction, a picture of the > remediated wall with all the studs completely white because they are > covered with white encapsulant has always resulted in a happy buyer > (in my experience.) Buyers will never understand or trust lab tests > but seeing is believing. > > Rosen > > Coatings and remediator instruction at IICRC? > Group: I'm currently working on a project that involved a fairly > modest water loss in the attic of a single family residence. The > source was a kinked condensate line from the forced-air A/C unit > located in the attic (space heat is via a combination of radiant floor > and hot water fin-tube convectors). A limited area of the blown-in > cellulose insulation and adjoining framing was wet; fungal growth was > visible on the trusses. The amount of water released was not enough to > flow through the poly vapor retarder and did not significantly damage > the underlying gyp- board ceiling. The remediation contractor removed > all of the insulation from the entire ~1200 sq ft attic, used ice > blasting to remove fungal materials from the affected framing > elements, then initially used Anabec cleaning, disinfecting and > protective products. To shorten a longer story, he subsequently > returned to the home, used a Zinsser disinfectant and then sprayed > clear PermaGuard on every square inch of the framing, poly vapor > retarder, and OSB roof decking (plus the DWV piping, fireplace flue, > etc.). BTW, PermaGuard contains small quantities of chlorothalonil (an > EPA-registered pesticide), but the coating itself is not EPA > registered. When I asked why he coated every square inch of every > surface in the attic (even those that had not been water damaged) the > remediator responded that he was instructed to do so during training > at the IICRC. He named the specific instructors, and they are familiar > persons within the IICRC. Their names are not of critical importance > in this inquiry. Here are my questions -- I'd appreciate your > feedback. 1. Has anyone else been instructed to use a coating in this > way by the IICRC or by others? If so, what thought process was used or > justification provided? 2. Does anyone have any experience in using > this coating over the Anabec " Anashield " ? Could there be a chemical > compatibility concern? Could the " organosilane " (Anashield) inhibit or > slow curing of the PermaGuard (a " latex acrylic resin interior > sealer " )? Replies either on this list or privately (wab -at- > michaelsengineering .com) are welcome. TIA. Wane > <><><><><><><><><><><> Wane A. Baker, P.E., CIH Division Manager, > Indoor Air Quality MICHAELS ENGINEERING " Real Professionals. Real > Solutions. " 811 Monitor Street, Suite 100 PO Box 2377 La Crosse, > Wisconsin 54602 Phone , ext. 484 Cell Fax > mailto:wab@michaels engineering. com On the web at: > > > > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > > > > > > > > > > > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.