Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Confusion

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

In a message dated 1/11/2003 7:54:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,

anafvb@... writes:

> I loved the TA: I am being nice to her. It does feel true.

> Still, I have mixed feelings about getting the police involved in the

> situation.

> Some thougths:

> - reporting the incident to the police was not a nice thing to do.

> - reporting the incident to the police wasn't necessary

> - it was an over -reaction

> - reporting the incident to the police is a way of saying we think

> what she did was very serious and unacceptable

> -Reporting the incident to the police will prevent it from

> happening again

> -reporting the fact to the police will stop her.

> - reporting the fact to the police will make her think about what she

> is doing.

>

>

> Any other ideas?

>

> Love

> Ana

>

Sweet Ana~

Since you were working with the idea of being *nice*...how about finishing

your judgment: **Reporting the incident to the police was not a nice thing to

do because....

Is there something you're afraid will happen to her as a result of the police

knowing? What are the worst case scenarios that you can think will happen?

Will they fine her? Put her in jail? Order community service? Where is your

mind taking you with it? And once you get those ideas, ask yourself if those

things are really *not nice* for them to happen to her.

You did Work before about thinking you needed to protect your family and Al

from your neighbor. Is there part of you now that feels like you have to

protect her from the police?

You're doing a great job, Ana. : )

Love,

*mona

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> In a message dated 1/11/2003 7:54:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,

> anafvb@t... writes:

>

> > I loved the TA: I am being nice to her. It does feel true.

> > Still, I have mixed feelings about getting the police involved in

the

> > situation.

> > Some thougths:

> > - reporting the incident to the police was not a nice thing to

do.

> > - reporting the incident to the police wasn't necessary

> > - it was an over -reaction

> > - reporting the incident to the police is a way of saying we

think

> > what she did was very serious and unacceptable

> > -Reporting the incident to the police will prevent it from

> > happening again

> > -reporting the fact to the police will stop her.

> > - reporting the fact to the police will make her think about what

she

> > is doing.

> >

> >

> > Any other ideas?

> >

> > Love

> > Ana

> >

>

> Sweet Ana~

> Since you were working with the idea of being *nice*...how about

finishing

> your judgment: **Reporting the incident to the police was not a

nice thing to

> do because....

>

> Is there something you're afraid will happen to her as a result of

the police

> knowing? What are the worst case scenarios that you can think will

happen?

> Will they fine her? Put her in jail? Order community service? Where

is your

> mind taking you with it? And once you get those ideas, ask yourself

if those

> things are really *not nice* for them to happen to her.

>

> You did Work before about thinking you needed to protect your

family and Al

> from your neighbor. Is there part of you now that feels like you

have to

> protect her from the police?

>

> You're doing a great job, Ana. : )

>

> Love,

> *mona

>

> You are such a great helper Mona.

I am so grateful that you are there...

I am also grateful that I am here trying to figure this out.

Yes, there is a part of me that feels like I have to protect her from

the police now. Oh my God! This sounds so crazy/funny/ so great over

protective mother me!

...........

Thinking about it, I actually find that whatever the police decides

to do with her is not my business. There is actually nothing I think

that should or shouldn't happen.

..............

Reporting the incident to the police was not a nice thing to do

because...

.... neighbors should be able to solve their conflicts peacefully

between themselves.

(I feel there maybe more here) I will continue tomorrow.

A Good night hug : )

Ana

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Guest guest

Good one, Kishoreda. To add to the confusion, isn't Rahul G's girlfriend

Columbian ?

Prabha'84

Shah wrote:

" Really! Rahul should not have done this. "

" You mean take drugs and consort with homosexuals? "

" Wha...? Drugs? Homosexuals? I didn't know that. The most I had heard was

that

he had a Spanish girl friend. And in this age of globalization, that is no

big deal. "

" Girl friend? Which Rahul are you talking about? "

" Aren't you talking about Rahul Gandhi? I was saying that he should not have

postponed taking over as the General Secretary. "

" Oh! ha ha! I thought that you were talking about the Mahajan kid's

problems. Oh

there is Ramesh. Ramesh! Just hear what confusion we had! He said that Rahul

should not have done this, and I naturally assumed that he meant Mahajan. "

" Yeah! Rahul really should not have done this. He should concentrate only on

business and not politics. After all he comes from a business family. "

" Now which Rahul are you talking about? "

" Aren't both of you talking about Rahul Bajaj? "

Kishore Shah 1974

------------------------------

Website: www.mgims.org

------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Now I am confused! :) You are right, Prabha.

Kishore Shah 1974

Re: Confusion

> Good one, Kishoreda. To add to the confusion, isn't Rahul G's girlfriend

> Columbian ?

>

> Prabha'84

>

> Shah wrote:

> " Really! Rahul should not have done this. "

>

> " You mean take drugs and consort with homosexuals? "

>

> " Wha...? Drugs? Homosexuals? I didn't know that. The most I had heard was

> that

>

> he had a Spanish girl friend. And in this age of globalization, that is no

> big deal. "

>

> " Girl friend? Which Rahul are you talking about? "

>

> " Aren't you talking about Rahul Gandhi? I was saying that he should not

> have

>

> postponed taking over as the General Secretary. "

>

> " Oh! ha ha! I thought that you were talking about the Mahajan kid's

> problems. Oh

>

> there is Ramesh. Ramesh! Just hear what confusion we had! He said that

> Rahul

>

> should not have done this, and I naturally assumed that he meant Mahajan. "

>

> " Yeah! Rahul really should not have done this. He should concentrate only

> on

>

> business and not politics. After all he comes from a business family. "

>

> " Now which Rahul are you talking about? "

>

> " Aren't both of you talking about Rahul Bajaj? "

>

> Kishore Shah 1974

>

>

>

> ------------------------------

> Website: www.mgims.org

> ------------------------------

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...