Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Thank you very much for posting this very valuable information. Do you know if this is a precedent that is to be honored in other states, i.e. Texas? A On May 3, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Texas-Autism-Advocacy wrote: > ESY Ruling > > In v. Bixby ISD 4 (10th Circuit, Tulsa County, Ok, 1990) the >> court confirmed as follows: >> Regression-recoupment is not the only measure used to determine the >> necessity of >> an ESY program. Other factors include “the degree of impairment, the >> ability of >> the child’s parents to provide the educational structure at home, the >> child’s rate of >> progress, his or her behavioral and physical problems, the >> availability of >> alternative resources, the ability of the child to interact with >> non-disabled >> children, the areas of the curriculum which need continuous >> attention, >> and the >> child’s vocational needs.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.