Frequencies of elements / WAS [electroherbalism] FrequencyLists

[Guest guest]

Hello rifers,

There have been several posts in recent months inquiring about " frequencies for

the elements " . Various replies pointed to what's called " Larmour " or the

" nuclear magnetic " resonance frequencies of some of the elements. However,

there are some serious misconceptions developing in the Rife community about

these frequencies. Very briefly, here are some problems.

A nuclear magnetic resonant (NMR) frequency response can only be excited in the

presence of an external magnetic field. The frequency depends on the strength

of that external field. In other words, if a person at one location is in the

presence of a certain field strength, and a person on the other side of the

planet is in the presence of a different field strength, the two NMR frequencies

will be totally different.

There may be other factors in complex biological situations which could also

affect the resonant response in some ways.

But even more important, there are some elements shown in the non-consolidated

frequency list which should not even be on that list(see url in a previous post

below), because some of the most common elemental isotopes present in the human

body simply will not respond to any nuclear magnetic resonant excitation. The

reasons are too involved for a short email, but have to do with the relative

numbers of protons and neutrons in any one atom's nucleus, and their associated

spins. If one goes to a good physics book and reads about " nuclear magnetic

resonance " there will be more information.

But to give one important and simple example. One the aforementioned list, the

resonant frequency for oxygen is given as 13.557 Mhz in a field of 2.3488 tesla.

(Other frequencies are given for lesser field strengths). The problem here is

this - these frequencies are only applicable to the very rare oxygen-17 isotope,

which has a presence in nature of a mere 0.038% of all oxygen. In no way does

it apply to the very common oxygen-16 isotope, which constitutes 99.762% of all

oxygen in nature. The oxygen-16 nucleus is actually incapable of displaying a

nuclear magnetic resonant response. So, to imply therefore that the frequencies

for oxygen in this list (even if the exact external magnetic field WAS known),

are applicable in any way whatsoever to rifing - or any device frequency

emission excitation, is a huge misconception.

The frequencies given in this list for carbon, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc,

molybdenum, lead, cadmium, nickel, germanium and others are likewise misleading,

because the correct isotopes are not stated...and in many cases the frequencies

are associated with isotopes that have an abundance in nature of anywhere

between slightly above zero to perhaps 25% of that element. The more abundant

isotopes of these elements in the human body, simply do not respond to attempts

at nuclear magnetic excitation, because certain elements' nuclei are incapable

of that type of response.

The CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics has some tables that will be helpful

here. The one near the very front of the book called " Atomic Masses and

Abundances " gives a list of the various isotopes of all the elements, and their

percentage of occurrence in nature. And in the section of the book called

" Molecular Structure and Spectroscopy " , there is a chart called " Nuclear Spins,

Moments, and Other Data Related to NMR Spectroscopy " . This chart includes the

correct NMR (Larmor) frequencies of many elemental isotopes. Most importantly

it includes the correct isotope numbers of the ones that DO respond and their

abundances, which are critical pieces of information. One will see for

instance, that the common oxygen-16 isotope is not even included on this list.

The obvious conclusion then - is that for the rifing purposes desired by most

people on these email lists, this proposal to use NMR-related frequencies for

the isotopes that DO respond is worthless, especially since the exact strength

of any external magnetic field would not be known to most people (unless someone

had sophisticated testing equipment). And then, they would have to be informed

about which elemental isotopes are (or are not) capable of responding to an

external magnetic field. The nuclei of certain important biological elements,

including carbon-12, oxygen-16, and calcium-40, will have no response at all.

With best wishes,

Char

http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/FrequenciesandAnecdotes/Non-Conso\

lidatedFrequencyList.htm

Three quarters down the list is the information you seek.

----- Original Message -----

>

> Are there lists of the resonant frequencies of the elements,

> especially those essential to human biology? TIA.