Re: Build Your Own machine links

[Guest guest]

Hi Sue,

The EM7V with the coils in anti-parallel is my favorite version. It has very

high magnetic and electric fields. The spark gaps give it an rf component that

aids penetration. We are now using 680 ohms to the base of each transistor.

This will be added to the diagram at http://www.royalrife.com/em7v.html.

Although the internal frequency generator has the advantage of some drift, you

can skip that if you want. If you use the F-SCAN2 for this, you should put an

rf choke on every wire that attaches to it. I can supply those. The F150 has a

variable duty cycle so that you can run 80% or more at high frequencies. The

F105 also has variable duty cycle and will do 0.01 Hz steps which helps

compensate for the lack of drift.

The rf from spark gaps cause a little TV interference, but I think that 60 feet

is enough distance.

Loyd http://www.royalrife.com

Build Your Own machine links

Hello all,

I have been a lurker for at least a year now. I have an FSCAN2 and

would like to graduate to a plasma device. I have convinced my

father, who is very capable, but very skeptical, to build one for

me. He is a physics engineer and used to build machines with tubes

in them and also night vision gear, so I think he is up to the task.

I would like to use the FSCAN2 to control the frequencies, or I will

by a F150.

My question is which of the following sites is better for build-your-

own instructions and is this list exhaustive? I am going to send all

the links to my father and let him pick. Once he has picked, I will

purchase all the parts and send them to him.

The sites I have found are:

http://www.royalrife.com/chubbuck.html

http://www.royalrife.com/em7v.html

http://www.dfe.net/EMEM.html

http://www.royalrife.com/emem2.html

[Guest guest]

Sue, the basics are easy - build a driver transistor assembly to drive a

car ignition coil which is connected to +12 volts. There may need to be

an amplifier of some sort that accepts low-level signals and boosts them

up to a solid 5 volt signal to the driver transistor (or possibly as

high as +10 or +11 volts signal if driving a power MosFet.) Remember

that the power transistor MUST be on a good heat sink, and some of use

use an internal fan to help keep the transistor cool (the coil too..)

The output of the ignition coil goes to the plasma lamp.

The EMEM can operate up to around 10 Khz. Higher frequencies - nope.

Most ignition coils are very poor up at 10 Khz - they're built to

perform at below 1 Khz, and there is a lot of iron in them, which

hampers the high frequency response. The racing ignition coils, like

the MSD " street car " rated coils, do a bit better at high frequencies.

(I've used racing motorcycle ignition coils too, much higher frequencies

from them, but they're so much smaller that there is a heat problem

using the typical single transistor driver - one really can't drive them

with a 50% duty cycle pulse at lower frequencies - they'll burn up.

Dr. Loyd's favorite uses a spark plug in series with the output lead to

the tube - very small gap if you want high frequencies from the spark

plug. In electronics testing I didn't see any effect from the spark plug

being there or not, and it creates a lot of radio-frequency

interference, so I didn't use one.

There are people out there who are using dual ignition coils wired in a

reverse polarity circuit - this can produce very high voltages (80,000

volts or more) to the plasma tube.. I have not experimented with these,

but I urge extreme caution with those highly dangerous voltages. You

might also consider means to insure that the tube does not become

disconnected while it's running, another safety mechanism.

The input - I'm not familiar with the Fscan's frequency output, nor that

of the F150 devices.. but be aware that the EMEM's only do up to around

10Khz, and they're really best at 5 Khz and below.

The EMEM device on my site is a cadillac with extras - a tube current

monitor as example, and most people don't need the extra complexity..

Good luck!

Dave

http://www.dfe.net

nicolezmomma wrote:

>

>

> Hello all,

>

> I have been a lurker for at least a year now. I have an FSCAN2 and

> would like to graduate to a plasma device. I have convinced my

> father, who is very capable, but very skeptical, to build one for

> me. He is a physics engineer and used to build machines with tubes

> in them and also night vision gear, so I think he is up to the task.

>

> I would like to use the FSCAN2 to control the frequencies, or I will

> by a F150.

>

> My question is which of the following sites is better for build-your-

> own instructions and is this list exhaustive? I am going to send all

> the links to my father and let him pick. Once he has picked, I will

> purchase all the parts and send them to him.

>

> The sites I have found are:

>

> http://www.royalrife.com/chubbuck.html

> http://www.royalrife.com/em7v.html

> http://www.dfe.net/EMEM.html

> http://www.royalrife.com/emem2.html

>

> I also thought there were some build instructions on Bruce¡¦s site,

> but could not find any.

>

> I am somewhat concerned about emissions going to far, as I live in

> the city and the next house is less than 60 feet away, the sidewalk

> is less than 20 feet away in the room I would use this technology in.

>

> I know all the above devices have different properties and everyone

> probably has differing opinions about the properties of each one. I

> figure this is another step in my acquisition of electronic healing

> devices (homemade mag pulser, LED, 2 zappers, etc), and I will

> keep my father busy in his retirement building me machines

> (hopefully) until I find the right one for meļ I am hoping he will

> get some benefit also. It seems to me that each machine¡¦s

> effectiveness will be unique to a person. In other words, different

> machines will be very effective on different people.

>

> Thanks for your help,

>

> Sue

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Sue,

I have a Rife/Bare, a 6CEM+ and an original F-Scan. We use all three. We

also have a MagPulser, Godzilla & Godzilla Lite. (We try everything.)

I notice that you say that you would like to " graduate " to a plasma device.

( I am supposing that you consider a plasma device a step up.) It is my

personal opinion that each of these devices have their own particular pluses

and minus's, but I don't see any one of them as being more preferable than

the others as a whole. I encourage you to keep your F-Scan and if you can

afford it, to add a plasma device to your arsenal.

I am not an expert, so my opinions are worth what you paid for them....

nothing. :-))

jra

Acts 20:29-31 KJV

Build Your Own machine links

Hello all,

I have an FSCAN2 and would like to graduate to a plasma device.

[Guest guest]

Hi,

My impressions regarding rife machines through reading....

There are 3 basic types of rife machines;

1. Contact pad type such as a Hulda . These are cheap to build

and there is some research that suggests that this might be

effective. The simplest contact type device doesn't even use

frequencies at all. Please refer to the following Yahoo group:

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/?

yguid=130878446 . They have instructions and schematics for

construction. They also have a copy of the research paper

documenting in vitro efficacy of this device from the Albert

Einstein College of Medicine. My opinion is that these contact pad

type devices use very little current. Therefore, they only sterilize

a small amount of blood, probably just 1 mL or so. I think that if

they work, they work by inactivating a small amount of retrovirus

(this includes common cold, herpes, and HIV) to produce something

like a vaccine effect. These devices typically are very easy to

build and cost less than $100 (cheap). I've built one and from

personal experience, they are safe and might be effective. I say

might be because the effectiveness that I've experienced may be just

a coincidence since I did not do a placebo controlled, double blind

study. I work in a hospital and I get sick during the cold/flu

season (there are lots of sick people & germs in a hospital).

However, (knock on wood) I've managed to stay well by giving myself

an hour of preventative treatment daily. I use it while I am

commuting to work.

2. Electromagnetic devices such as a Doug Coil or Magpulser. These

are extremely expensive to build, not to mention time consuming. The

electromagnetic coil has to be wound by hand. This is no easy task

as it is 500 ft of wire! That's longer than a football field! There

is some clinically published research suggesting that these devices

work. Check this out:

http://www.curatronic.com/scientific.html

>

>

> Hello all,

>

> I have been a lurker for at least a year now. I have an FSCAN2

and

> would like to graduate to a plasma device. I have convinced my

> father, who is very capable, but very skeptical, to build one for

> me. He is a physics engineer and used to build machines with

tubes

> in them and also night vision gear, so I think he is up to the

task.

>

> I would like to use the FSCAN2 to control the frequencies, or I

will

> by a F150.

>

> My question is which of the following sites is better for build-

your-

> own instructions and is this list exhaustive? I am going to send

all

> the links to my father and let him pick. Once he has picked, I

will

> purchase all the parts and send them to him.

>

> The sites I have found are:

>

> http://www.royalrife.com/chubbuck.html

> http://www.royalrife.com/em7v.html

> http://www.dfe.net/EMEM.html

> http://www.royalrife.com/emem2.html

>

> I also thought there were some build instructions on Bruce¡¦s

site,

> but could not find any.

>

> I am somewhat concerned about emissions going to far, as I live in

> the city and the next house is less than 60 feet away, the

sidewalk

> is less than 20 feet away in the room I would use this technology

in.

>

> I know all the above devices have different properties and

everyone

> probably has differing opinions about the properties of each one.

I

> figure this is another step in my acquisition of electronic

healing

> devices (homemade mag pulser, LED, 2 zappers, etc), and I

will

> keep my father busy in his retirement building me machines

> (hopefully) until I find the right one for meļ I am hoping he

will

> get some benefit also. It seems to me that each machine¡¦s

> effectiveness will be unique to a person. In other words,

different

> machines will be very effective on different people.

>

> Thanks for your help,

>

> Sue